Literature DB >> 31406555

Simulations corroborate telegraph model predictions for the extension distributions of nanochannel confined DNA.

Aditya Bikram Bhandari1, Kevin D Dorfman1.   

Abstract

Hairpins in the conformation of DNA confined in nanochannels close to their persistence length cause the distribution of their fractional extensions to be heavily left skewed. A recent theory rationalizes these skewed distributions using a correlated telegraph process, which can be solved exactly in the asymptotic limit of small but frequent hairpin formation. Pruned-enriched Rosenbluth method simulations of the fractional extension distribution for a channel-confined wormlike chain confirm the predictions of the telegraph model. Remarkably, the asymptotic result of the telegraph model remains robust well outside the asymptotic limit. As a result, the approximations in the theory required to map it to the polymer model and solve it in the asymptotic limit are not the source of discrepancies between the predictions of the telegraph model and experimental distributions of the extensions of DNA during genome mapping. The agreement between theory and simulations motivates future work to determine the source of the remaining discrepancies between the predictions of the telegraph model and experimental distributions of the extensions of DNA in nanochannels used for genome mapping.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31406555      PMCID: PMC6687496          DOI: 10.1063/1.5109566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomicrofluidics        ISSN: 1932-1058            Impact factor:   2.800


  29 in total

1.  Flat histogram version of the pruned and enriched Rosenbluth method.

Authors:  Thomas Prellberg; Jarosław Krawczyk
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  DNA confined in nanochannels: hairpin tightening by entropic depletion.

Authors:  Theo Odijk
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Statics and dynamics of single DNA molecules confined in nanochannels.

Authors:  Walter Reisner; Keith J Morton; Robert Riehn; Yan Mei Wang; Zhaoning Yu; Michael Rosen; James C Sturm; Stephen Y Chou; Erwin Frey; Robert H Austin
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2005-05-16       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Nanoconfinement-enhanced conformational response of single DNA molecules to changes in ionic environment.

Authors:  Walter Reisner; Jason P Beech; Niels B Larsen; Henrik Flyvbjerg; Anders Kristensen; Jonas O Tegenfeldt
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Chain extension of DNA confined in channels.

Authors:  Peter Cifra; Zuzana Benková; Tomás Bleha
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Scaling theory of DNA confined in nanochannels and nanoslits.

Authors:  Theo Odijk
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2008-06-09

7.  Channel confinement of flexible and semiflexible macromolecules.

Authors:  Peter Cifra
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Effects of electrostatic screening on the conformation of single DNA molecules confined in a nanochannel.

Authors:  Ce Zhang; Fang Zhang; Jeroen A van Kan; Johan R C van der Maarel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Ionic effects on the equilibrium dynamics of DNA confined in nanoslits.

Authors:  Chih-Chen Hsieh; Anthony Balducci; Patrick S Doyle
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Fluctuations of a long, semiflexible polymer in a narrow channel.

Authors:  Theodore W Burkhardt; Yingzi Yang; Gerhard Gompper
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2010-10-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Extension distribution for DNA confined in a nanochannel near the Odijk regime.

Authors:  Hui-Min Chuang; Jeffrey G Reifenberger; Aditya Bikram Bhandari; Kevin D Dorfman
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Limitations of the equivalent neutral polymer assumption for theories describing nanochannel-confined DNA.

Authors:  Aditya Bikram Bhandari; Kevin D Dorfman
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.529

3.  Single-molecule optical genome mapping in nanochannels: multidisciplinarity at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Jonathan Jeffet; Sapir Margalit; Yael Michaeli; Yuval Ebenstein
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 8.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.