Literature DB >> 31406295

Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation.

Mathias Wullum Nielsen1, Carter Walter Bloch2, Londa Schiebinger3.   

Abstract

Gender diversity has the potential to drive scientific discovery and innovation. Here, we distinguish three approaches to gender diversity: diversity in research teams, diversity in research methods and diversity in research questions. While gender diversity is commonly understood to refer only to the gender composition of research teams, fully realizing the potential of diversity for science and innovation also requires attention to the methods employed and questions raised in scientific knowledge-making. We provide a framework for understanding the best ways to support the three approaches to gender diversity across four interdependent domains - from research teams to the broader disciplines in which they are embedded to research organizations and ultimately to the different societies that shape them through specific gender norms and policies. Our analysis demonstrates that realizing the benefits of diversity for science requires careful management of these four interdependent domains.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31406295     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0433-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  18 in total

Review 1.  Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering.

Authors:  Cara Tannenbaum; Robert P Ellis; Friederike Eyssel; James Zou; Londa Schiebinger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

Authors:  Anaïs Llorens; Athina Tzovara; Ludovic Bellier; Ilina Bhaya-Grossman; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; William K Chang; Zachariah R Cross; Rosa Dominguez-Faus; Adeen Flinker; Yvonne Fonken; Mark A Gorenstein; Chris Holdgraf; Colin W Hoy; Maria V Ivanova; Richard T Jimenez; Soyeon Jun; Julia W Y Kam; Celeste Kidd; Enitan Marcelle; Deborah Marciano; Stephanie Martin; Nicholas E Myers; Karita Ojala; Anat Perry; Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas; Stephanie K Riès; Ignacio Saez; Ivan Skelin; Katarina Slama; Brooke Staveland; Danielle S Bassett; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Adrienne L Fairhall; Nancy J Kopell; Laura J Kray; Jack J Lin; Anna C Nobre; Dylan Riley; Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Joni D Wallis; Xiao-Jing Wang; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Sabine Kastner; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 18.688

3.  Gender Diversity in STEM Disciplines: A Multiple Factor Problem.

Authors:  Carmen Botella; Silvia Rueda; Emilia López-Iñesta; Paula Marzal
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  Impact of COVID-19 on longitudinal ophthalmology authorship gender trends.

Authors:  Anne X Nguyen; Xuan-Vi Trinh; Jerry Kurian; Albert Y Wu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals.

Authors:  Flaminio Squazzoni; Giangiacomo Bravo; Mike Farjam; Ana Marusic; Bahar Mehmani; Michael Willis; Aliaksandr Birukou; Pierpaolo Dondio; Francisco Grimaldo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  COVID-19 gender policy changes support female scientists and improve research quality.

Authors:  Holly O Witteman; Jenna Haverfield; Cara Tannenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gender Authorship Trends in the Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Literature.

Authors:  Kalla A Gervasio; Bonnie A Sklar; Anne X Nguyen; Albert Y Wu
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 1.746

8.  COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected.

Authors:  Jens Peter Andersen; Mathias Wullum Nielsen; Nicole L Simone; Resa E Lewiss; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Virtual conferences raise standards for accessibility and interactions.

Authors:  Sarvenaz Sarabipour
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  A 10-year longitudinal evaluation of science policy interventions to promote sex and gender in health research.

Authors:  Jenna Haverfield; Cara Tannenbaum
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.