Literature DB >> 31405830

Development and Validation of a Pragmatic Electronic Phenotype for CKD.

Jenna M Norton1, Kaltun Ali2, Claudine T Jurkovitz3, Krzysztof Kiryluk4, Meyeon Park5, Kensaku Kawamoto6, Ning Shang7, Sankar D Navaneethan8,9, Andrew S Narva2, Paul Drawz10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Poor identification of individuals with CKD is a major barrier to research and appropriate clinical management of the disease. We aimed to develop and validate a pragmatic electronic (e-) phenotype to identify patients likely to have CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The e-phenotype was developed by an expert working group and implemented among adults receiving in- or outpatient care at five healthcare organizations. To determine urine albumin (UA) dipstick cutoffs for CKD to enable use in the e-phenotype when lacking urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), we compared same day UACR and UA results at four sites. A sample of patients, spanning no CKD to ESKD, was randomly selected at four sites for validation via blinded chart review.
RESULTS: The CKD e-phenotype was defined as most recent eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with at least one value <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 >90 days prior and/or a UACR of ≥30 mg/g in the most recent test with at least one positive value >90 days prior. Dialysis and transplant were identified using diagnosis codes. In absence of UACR, a sensitive CKD definition would consider negative UA results as normal to mildly increased (KDIGO A1), trace to 1+ as moderately increased (KDIGO A2), and ≥2+ as severely increased (KDIGO A3). Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the CKD e-phenotype were 99%, 99%, and 98%, respectively. For dialysis sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 89%. For transplant, sensitivity was 97% and specificity was 91%.
CONCLUSIONS: The CKD e-phenotype provides a pragmatic and accurate method for EHR-based identification of patients likely to have CKD.
Copyright © 2019 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EGFR protein, human; adult; albumins; chronic kidney failure; chronic renal insufficiency; creatinine; epidermal growth factor; glomerular filtration rate; humans; outpatients; phenotype; receptor, epidermal growth factor; renal dialysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31405830      PMCID: PMC6730512          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00360119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  8 in total

Review 1.  Validation of CKD and related conditions in existing data sets: A systematic review.

Authors:  Morgan E Grams; Laura C Plantinga; Elizabeth Hedgeman; Rajiv Saran; Gary L Myers; Desmond E Williams; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  State of the art for measurement of urine albumin: comparison of routine measurement procedures to isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Lorin M Bachmann; Goran Nilsson; David E Bruns; Matthew J McQueen; John C Lieske; Jack J Zakowski; W Greg Miller
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  CKD as a Model for Improving Chronic Disease Care through Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Paul E Drawz; Patrick Archdeacon; Clement J McDonald; Neil R Powe; Kimberly A Smith; Jenna Norton; Desmond E Williams; Uptal D Patel; Andrew Narva
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Development and validation of an electronic phenotyping algorithm for chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Girish N Nadkarni; Omri Gottesman; James G Linneman; Herbert Chase; Richard L Berg; Samira Farouk; Rajiv Nadukuru; Vaneet Lotay; Steve Ellis; George Hripcsak; Peggy Peissig; Chunhua Weng; Erwin P Bottinger
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

5.  Creatinine measurement: state of the art in accuracy and interlaboratory harmonization.

Authors:  W Greg Miller; Gary L Myers; Edward R Ashwood; Anthony A Killeen; Edward Wang; Linda M Thienpont; Lothar Siekmann
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Variation in Patients' Awareness of CKD according to How They Are Asked.

Authors:  Delphine S Tuot; Yunnuo Zhu; Alexandra Velasquez; Juan Espinoza; C Damaris Mendez; Tanushree Banerjee; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Symptom burden, depression, and quality of life in chronic and end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Khaled Abdel-Kader; Mark L Unruh; Steven D Weisbord
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 25.391

  8 in total
  19 in total

1.  Finding That Needle in the Haystack: Computable Phenotypes.

Authors:  Dorey Glenn; Keisha L Gibson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Persistent Disparities in Preemptive Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Tanjala S Purnell; Deidra C Crews
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  An Electronic CKD Phenotype: A Step Forward in Improving Kidney Care.

Authors:  Sri Lekha Tummalapalli; Carmen A Peralta
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  EHR-Based Clinical Trials: The Next Generation of Evidence.

Authors:  Khaled Abdel-Kader; Manisha Jhamb
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Effects of the 2021 CKD-EPI Creatinine eGFR Equation among a National US Veteran Cohort.

Authors:  L Parker Gregg; Peter A Richardson; Julia Akeroyd; Michael E Matheny; Salim S Virani; Sankar D Navaneethan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Early Detection of CKD: Implications for Low-Income, Middle-Income, and High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; James A Dickinson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 7.  Big Data in Nephrology.

Authors:  Navchetan Kaur; Sanchita Bhattacharya; Atul J Butte
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 28.314

8.  Patient and Provider Characteristics Associated With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Prescription in Patients With Diabetes and Proteinuric Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Ian E McCoy; Jialin Han; Maria E Montez-Rath; Glenn M Chertow; Jinnie J Rhee
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-07

9.  Association of Blood Pressure Variability and Diuretics With Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 1-5.

Authors:  L Parker Gregg; S Susan Hedayati; Hui Yang; Peter N Van Buren; Subhash Banerjee; Sankar D Navaneethan; Salim S Virani; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Carlos A Alvarez
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  eHealth in kidney care.

Authors:  Chia-Shi Wang; Elaine Ku
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 28.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.