PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to incorporate stricter probable nonfatal opioid overdose case criteria, and advanced epidemiologic approaches to more reliably detect local clustering in nonfatal opioid overdose activity in EMS runs data. METHODS: Data were obtained using emsCharts for our study area in southwestern Pennsylvania from 2007 to 2018. Cases were identified as emergency medical service (EMS) responses where naloxone was administered, and improvement was noted in patient records between initial and final Glasgow Coma Score. A subsample of all-cause EMS responses sites were used as controls and exact matched to cases on sex and 10-year-age category. Clustering was assessed using difference in Ripley's K function for cases and controls and Kulldorff scan statistics. RESULTS: Difference in K functions indicated no significant difference in probable nonfatal overdose EMS runs across the study area compared to all-cause EMS runs. However, scan statistics did identify significant local clustering of probable nonfatal overdose EMS runs (maximum likelihood = 16.40, P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight relevance of EMS data to detect community-level overdose activity and promote reliable use through stricter case definition criteria and advanced methodological approaches. Techniques examined have the potential to improve targeted delivery of neighborhood-level public health response activities using a near real-time data source.
PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to incorporate stricter probable nonfatal opioid overdose case criteria, and advanced epidemiologic approaches to more reliably detect local clustering in nonfatal opioid overdose activity in EMS runs data. METHODS: Data were obtained using emsCharts for our study area in southwestern Pennsylvania from 2007 to 2018. Cases were identified as emergency medical service (EMS) responses where naloxone was administered, and improvement was noted in patient records between initial and final Glasgow Coma Score. A subsample of all-cause EMS responses sites were used as controls and exact matched to cases on sex and 10-year-age category. Clustering was assessed using difference in Ripley's K function for cases and controls and Kulldorff scan statistics. RESULTS: Difference in K functions indicated no significant difference in probable nonfatal overdose EMS runs across the study area compared to all-cause EMS runs. However, scan statistics did identify significant local clustering of probable nonfatal overdose EMS runs (maximum likelihood = 16.40, P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight relevance of EMS data to detect community-level overdose activity and promote reliable use through stricter case definition criteria and advanced methodological approaches. Techniques examined have the potential to improve targeted delivery of neighborhood-level public health response activities using a near real-time data source.
Authors: Mark Faul; Michael W Dailey; David E Sugerman; Scott M Sasser; Benjamin Levy; Len J Paulozzi Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Heather A Lindstrom; Brian M Clemency; Ryan Snyder; Joseph D Consiglio; Paul R May; Ronald M Moscati Journal: Prehosp Disaster Med Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 2.040
Authors: Roland C Merchant; Beth L Schwartzapfel; Francis A Wolf; Wenjun Li; Lynn Carlson; Josiah D Rich Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Christopher Rowe; Glenn-Milo Santos; Eric Vittinghoff; Eliza Wheeler; Peter Davidson; Philip O Coffin Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Junhee Han; Li Zhu; Martin Kulldorff; Scott Hostovich; David G Stinchcomb; Zaria Tatalovich; Denise Riedel Lewis; Eric J Feuer Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Benjamin D Hallowell; Laura C Chambers; Jason Rhodes; Melissa Basta; Samara Viner-Brown; Leanne Lasher Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2021 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.792