Mark Faul1, Michael W Dailey, David E Sugerman, Scott M Sasser, Benjamin Levy, Len J Paulozzi. 1. Mark Faul, David E. Sugerman, Benjamin Levy, and Len J. Paulozzi are with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Michael W. Dailey is with the Department of Emergency Medicine, Albany Medical Center, NY. Scott M. Sasser is with the Department of Emergency Medicine, Greenville Health System, SC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We determined the factors that affect naloxone (Narcan) administration in drug overdoses, including the certification level of emergency medical technicians (EMTs). METHODS: In 2012, 42 states contributed all or a portion of their ambulatory data to the National Emergency Medical Services Information System. We used a logistic regression model to measure the association between naloxone administration and emergency medical services certification level, age, gender, geographic location, and patient primary symptom. RESULTS: The odds of naloxone administration were much higher among EMT-intermediates than among EMT-basics (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5, 6.5). Naloxone use was higher in suburban areas than in urban areas (AOR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.3, 1.5), followed by rural areas (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.1, 1.3). Although the odds of naloxone administration were 23% higher in rural areas than in urban areas, the opioid drug overdose rate is 45% higher in rural communities. CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone is less often administered by EMT-basics, who are more common in rural areas. In most states, the scope-of-practice model prohibits naloxone administration by basic EMTs. Reducing this barrier could help prevent drug overdose death.
OBJECTIVES: We determined the factors that affect naloxone (Narcan) administration in drug overdoses, including the certification level of emergency medical technicians (EMTs). METHODS: In 2012, 42 states contributed all or a portion of their ambulatory data to the National Emergency Medical Services Information System. We used a logistic regression model to measure the association between naloxone administration and emergency medical services certification level, age, gender, geographic location, and patient primary symptom. RESULTS: The odds of naloxone administration were much higher among EMT-intermediates than among EMT-basics (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 5.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5, 6.5). Naloxone use was higher in suburban areas than in urban areas (AOR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.3, 1.5), followed by rural areas (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.1, 1.3). Although the odds of naloxone administration were 23% higher in rural areas than in urban areas, the opioid drug overdose rate is 45% higher in rural communities. CONCLUSIONS:Naloxone is less often administered by EMT-basics, who are more common in rural areas. In most states, the scope-of-practice model prohibits naloxone administration by basic EMTs. Reducing this barrier could help prevent drug overdose death.
Authors: Kelly E Dunn; Frederick S Barrett; Claudia Yepez-Laubach; Andrew C Meyer; Bryce J Hruska; Kathy Petrush; Suzan Berman; Stacey C Sigmon; Michael Fingerhood; George E Bigelow Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2016-12
Authors: Sean T Allen; Rebecca Hamilton White; Allison O'Rourke; Suzanne M Grieb; Michael E Kilkenny; Susan G Sherman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-09-21 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Mark Faul; Judy A Stevens; Scott M Sasser; Lisa Alee; Angela J Deokar; Deborah A Kuhls; Peter A Burke Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Benjamin Levy; Bridget Spelke; Leonard J Paulozzi; Jeneita M Bell; Kurt B Nolte; Sarah Lathrop; David E Sugerman; Michael Landen Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 4.492