| Literature DB >> 31405080 |
David Damiens1,2, Lucie Marquereau3,4, Cyrille Lebon3,4, Gilbert Le Goff3,4, Benjamin Gaudillat3,4, Nausicaa Habchi-Hanriot3,4, Louis-Clément Gouagna3,4.
Abstract
For the production of several hundred thousands of Aedes albopictus sterile males for the implementation of a Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) program, no costly mass-rearing equipment is needed during the initial phases, as optimized rearing at laboratory scale can be sufficient for the first steps. The aim of this study was to maximize the egg production by optimizing adult rearing methods for Ae. albopictus. The effect of parameters such as male/female ratio, density of adults, membrane type for blood feeding, quantity of blood delivered, continuous or discontinuous blood feeding, and surface of substrates for egg laying on overall egg production was tested to find optimized conditions. Based on the number of eggs produced per cage in response to the parameters tested, the optimum cage set-up was seen to be 1500 adults in a 30 × 30 × 30 cm cage with a male/female sex ratio of 1:3, fed by fresh bovine blood for periods of 30 min using a cellulose membrane covering a 10 cm stainless steel plate heated by a Hemotek device, and the provision of five oviposition cups to collect eggs. With this set-up, production per cage can reach a maximum of 35,000 eggs per week.Entities:
Keywords: insect production; male mosquito; mosquito facility; sterile insect technique
Year: 2019 PMID: 31405080 PMCID: PMC6723893 DOI: 10.3390/insects10080246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Figure 1Survival curves of adults according to three different cage densities: 1000, 1500, and 2000 adults with a ratio of one male for three females in standard rearing cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm) with continuous access to 5% (wt:vol) sucrose solution.
Figure 2Number of eggs produced by cages fed with cellulose membrane (CM), turkey skin (TS), and Parafilm® membrane (PM). Histograms with the same letter indicate that the results are not significantly different (p > 0.05, Tukey’s HSD post hoc test following an ANOVA procedure within each treatment). No letters indicate no significant difference between the treatments.