| Literature DB >> 25849812 |
Dongjing Zhang1, Xiaoying Zheng2, Zhiyong Xi3, Kostas Bourtzis4, Jeremie R L Gilles4.
Abstract
The mosquito species Aedes albopictus is a major vector of the human diseases dengue and chikungunya. Due to the lack of efficient and sustainable methods to control this mosquito species, there is an increasing interest in developing and applying the sterile insect technique (SIT) and the incompatible insect technique (IIT), separately or in combination, as population suppression approaches. Ae. albopictus is naturally double-infected with two Wolbachia strains, wAlbA and wAlbB. A new triple Wolbachia-infected strain (i.e., a strain infected with wAlbA, wAlbB, and wPip), known as HC and expressing strong cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) in appropriate matings, was recently developed. In the present study, we compared several fitness traits of three Ae. albopictus strains (triple-infected, double-infected and uninfected), all of which were of the same genetic background ("Guangzhou City, China") and were reared under the same conditions. Investigation of egg-hatching rate, survival of pupae and adults, sex ratio, duration of larval stages (development time from L1 to pupation), time to emergence (development time from L1 to adult emergence), wing length, female fecundity and adult longevity indicated that the presence of Wolbachia had only a minimal effect on host fitness. Based on this evidence, the HC strain is currently under consideration for mass rearing and application in a combined SIT-IIT strategy to control natural populations of Ae. albopictus in mainland China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25849812 PMCID: PMC4388707 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The locations of Aedes albopictus larvae collected in the field of Guangzhou.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Conghua | 23°41'37.72" N | 113°52'35.09" E |
| 2 | Conghua | 23°29'50.48" N | 113°33'6.45" E |
| 3 | Baiyun | 23°16'18.71" N | 113°13'27.56" E |
| 4 | Baiyun | 23°13'35.07" N | 113°16'42.64" E |
| 5 | Baiyun | 23°11'2.37" N | 113°14'51.52" E |
| 6 | Baiyun | 23°10'8.09" N | 113°15'40.25" E |
| 7 | Tianhe | 23° 9'15.51" N | 113°19'30.83" E |
| 8 | Tianhe | 23° 7'33.76" N | 113°19'6.00" E |
| 9 | Liwan | 23° 7'14.47" N | 113°14'0.24" E |
| 10 | Liwan | 23° 7'26.99" N | 113°13'56.89" E |
| 11 | Yuexiu | 23° 9'3.17" N | 113°16'54.92" E |
| 12 | Yuexiu | 23° 7'13.43" N | 113°15'55.67" E |
| 13 | Yuexiu | 23° 7'12.84" N | 113°15'34.88" E |
| 14 | Haizhu | 23° 5'55.69" N | 113°15'58.89" E |
| 15 | Haizhu | 23° 5'56.10" N | 113°16'30.73" E |
| 16 | Haizhu | 23° 5'45.05" N | 113°15'38.92" E |
| 17 | Haizhu | 23° 5'25.78" N | 113°16'17.09" E |
| 18 | Panyu | 22°56'18.87" N | 113°21'12.34" E |
| 19 | Panyu | 22°55'10.15" N | 113°20'6.59" E |
| 20 | Nansha | 22°44'8.50" N | 113°28'59.11" E |
Egg hatching rate, survivorship, and sex ratio (Mean ± SE) of the Ae. albopictus HC, GUA and GT strains.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | 83.2 ± 1.7 a | 90.3 ± 1.1 a | 89.3 ± 0.2 a | 53.9± 0.5 a | ||
| GUA | 85.6 ± 3.3 a | 94.5 ± 1.8 a | 93.7 ± 1.9 a | 52.4± 2.8 a | ||
| GT | 82.0 ± 4.7 a | 89.4 ± 0.5 a | 88.5 ± 1.0 a | 50.2± 3.3 a | ||
a Sex ratio was calculated as the proportion of females out of the total number of adults
Within a column, values followed by different lowercase letters were statistically different; ANOVA was performed for egg hatching rate, survivorship, and sex ratio analysis (P<0.05).
Developmental time (Mean ± SE) from L1 to pupa formation and from L1 to adult emergence of the Ae.albopictus HC, GUA and GT strains.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| HC | 4.82 ± 0.06 a | 6.06 ± 0.08 c | 6.86 ± 0.06 a | 8.08 ± 0.07 c |
| GUA | 5.29 ± 0.06 b | 6.35 ± 0.06 d | 7.34 ± 0.05 b | 8.42 ± 0.05 d |
| GT | 5.45 ± 0.09 b | 6.36 ± 0.08 d | 7.49 ± 0.09 b | 8.38 ± 0.08 d |
Within a column, values followed by different lowercase letters were statistically different (P<0.05) using ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test analysis. Independent t-test was used to compare potential differences in the mean time to pupation and to emergence of males and females among the three strains studied (P<0.05).
Fig 1Box plots of wing length measurements (Mean ±SD) for females (graypoint) and males (black point).
Boxes with the same number or letter were not significantly different betweeneach line, P<0.05 (Tukey’s post-hoc test). Asterisks (***) indicate a significant difference between male and femalewithin the same strain, P<0.05 (Independent t-test).
Female fecundity (Mean ± SE) of the Ae.albopictus HC, GUA and GT strains.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | 3 | 45 | 2477 | 55.0 ± 2.3 a |
| GUA | 3 | 34 | 1974 | 58.1 ± 2.5 a |
| GT | 3 | 36 | 2042 | 56.7 ± 2.4 a |
a The number of females which laid eggs.
Within a column, values followed by different lowercase letters were statistically different (P<0.05) using ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test analysis.
Fig 2Adult survival curves for the Ae. albopictusHC, GUA and GT strains.
Day number indicates time post-emergence. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the adultsurvivor function. A: Males only and fed on sugar; B: Females together with males and fed on sugar only; C: Females together with malesandfed on sugar and blood.