Literature DB >> 31404020

SpHincterotomy for Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis Randomized Trial: Rationale, Methodology, and Potential Implications.

Gregory A Coté1, Valerie L Durkalski-Mauldin2, Jose Serrano3, Erin Klintworth2, April W Williams2, Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate4,5, Mustafa Arain6, James L Buxbaum7, Darwin L Conwell4, Evan L Fogel8, Martin L Freeman9, Timothy B Gardner10, Erwin van Geenen11, J Royce Groce4, Sreenivasa S Jonnalagadda12, Rajesh N Keswani13, Shyam Menon14, Dana C Moffatt15, Georgios I Papachristou16, Andrew Ross17, Paul R Tarnasky18, Andrew Y Wang19, C Mel Wilcox20, Frank Hamilton3, Dhiraj Yadav16.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP), pancreas divisum, and no other etiologic factors, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy (miES) is often performed to enlarge the minor papillary orifice, based on limited data. The aims of this study are to describe the rationale and methodology of a sham-controlled clinical trial designed to test the hypothesis that miES reduces the risk of acute pancreatitis.
METHODS: The SpHincterotomy for Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis (SHARP) trial is a multicenter, international, sham-controlled, randomized trial comparing endoscopic ultrasound + ERCP with miES versus endoscopic ultrasound + sham for the management of ARP. A total of 234 consented patients having 2 or more discrete episodes of acute pancreatitis, pancreas divisum confirmed by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and no other clear etiology for acute pancreatitis will be randomized. Both cohorts will be followed for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 48 months.
RESULTS: The trial is powered to detect a 33% risk reduction of acute pancreatitis frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: The SHARP trial will determine whether ERCP with miES benefits patients with idiopathic ARP and pancreas divisum. Trial planning has informed the importance of blinded outcome assessors and long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31404020      PMCID: PMC6699897          DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreas        ISSN: 0885-3177            Impact factor:   3.327


  31 in total

1.  A practical comparison of blinded methods for sample size reviews in survival data clinical trials.

Authors:  Susan Todd; Elsa Valdés-Márquez; Jodie West
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 1.894

2.  Clinical outcomes and nonendoscopic interventions after minor papilla endotherapy in patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum.

Authors:  Lyssa N Chacko; Yang K Chen; Raj J Shah
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Detecting risk drinking during pregnancy: a comparison of four screening questionnaires.

Authors:  M Russell; S S Martier; R J Sokol; P Mudar; S Jacobson; J Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Endoscopic pancreatic duct stents reduce the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Atsushi Sofuni; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Hiroshi Kawakami; Atsushi Irisawa; Kensuke Kubota; Shinji Okaniwa; Masataka Kikuyama; Hiromu Kutsumi; Keiji Hanada; Toshiharu Ueki; Takao Itoi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Mortality, cancer, and comorbidities associated with chronic pancreatitis: a Danish nationwide matched-cohort study.

Authors:  Ulrich Christian Bang; Thomas Benfield; Lars Hyldstrup; Flemming Bendtsen; Jens-Erik Beck Jensen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  M L Freeman; J A DiSario; D B Nelson; M B Fennerty; J G Lee; D J Bjorkman; C S Overby; J Aas; M E Ryan; G S Bochna; M J Shaw; H W Snady; R V Erickson; J P Moore; J P Roel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Does high pancreatic duct pressure compromise the duct mucosal barrier function to pancreatic exocrine proteins?

Authors:  T Arendt; M Hänsler; C Stoffregen; U R Fölsch
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.205

8.  Long-term clinical outcomes after endoscopic minor papilla therapy in symptomatic patients with pancreas divisum.

Authors:  Gregory D Borak; Joseph Romagnuolo; Mohammad Alsolaiman; Edward W Holt; Peter B Cotton
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis Significantly Reduces Quality of Life Even in the Absence of Overt Chronic Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté; Dhiraj Yadav; Judah A Abberbock; David C Whitcomb; Stuart Sherman; Bimaljit S Sandhu; Michelle A Anderson; Michele D Lewis; Samer Alkaade; Vikesh K Singh; John Baillie; Peter A Banks; Darwin Conwell; Nalini M Guda; Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Gong Tang; Randall Brand; Andres Gelrud; Stephen T Amann; Christopher E Forsmark; Mel C Wilcox; Adam Slivka; Timothy B Gardner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Alcohol screening questionnaires in women: a critical review.

Authors:  K A Bradley; J Boyd-Wickizer; S H Powell; M L Burman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  Secretin-Enhanced MRCP: How and Why-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jordan Swensson; Atif Zaheer; Darwin Conwell; Kumar Sandrasegaran; Riccardo Manfredi; Temel Tirkes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Recruitment and Retention Strategies for the Diabetes RElated to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms Study: From the Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium.

Authors:  Cemal Yazici; Anne-Marie Dyer; Darwin L Conwell; Elham Afghani; Dana K Andersen; Marina Basina; Melena D Bellin; Leslie R Boone; Anna Casu; Jeffrey J Easler; Carla J Greenbaum; Phil A Hart; Christie Y Jeon; Peter J Lee; Shelby Meier; Georgios I Papachristou; Nazia T Raja-Khan; Zeb I Saeed; Jose Serrano; Dhiraj Yadav; Evan L Fogel
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Rationale and Design for the Diabetes RElated to Acute Pancreatitis and Its Mechanisms Study: A Prospective Cohort Study From the Type 1 Diabetes in Acute Pancreatitis Consortium.

Authors:  Phil A Hart; Georgios I Papachristou; Walter G Park; Anne-Marie Dyer; Vernon M Chinchilli; Elham Afghani; Venkata S Akshintala; Dana K Andersen; James L Buxbaum; Darwin L Conwell; Kathleen M Dungan; Jeffrey J Easler; Evan L Fogel; Carla J Greenbaum; Rita R Kalyani; Murray Korc; Richard Kozarek; Maren R Laughlin; Peter J Lee; Jennifer L Maranki; Stephen J Pandol; Anna Evans Phillips; Jose Serrano; Vikesh K Singh; Cate Speake; Temel Tirkes; Frederico G S Toledo; Guru Trikudanathan; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Ming Wang; Cemal Yazici; Atif Zaheer; Christopher E Forsmark; Melena D Bellin; Dhiraj Yadav
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Impact of genetic testing and smoking on the distribution of risk factors in patients with recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Merve Gurakar; Niloofar Y Jalaly; Mahya Faghih; Tina Boortalary; Javad R Azadi; Mouen A Khashab; Christopher Fan; Anthony N Kalloo; Atif Zaheer; Vikesh K Singh; Elham Afghani
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.027

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.