Literature DB >> 28895760

Application of a semi-automatic cartilage segmentation method for biomechanical modeling of the knee joint.

Mimmi K Liukkonen1,2, Mika E Mononen1, Petri Tanska1, Simo Saarakkala3,4,5, Miika T Nieminen3,4,5, Rami K Korhonen1,2.   

Abstract

Manual segmentation of articular cartilage from knee joint 3D magnetic resonance images (MRI) is a time consuming and laborious task. Thus, automatic methods are needed for faster and reproducible segmentations. In the present study, we developed a semi-automatic segmentation method based on radial intensity profiles to generate 3D geometries of knee joint cartilage which were then used in computational biomechanical models of the knee joint. Six healthy volunteers were imaged with a 3T MRI device and their knee cartilages were segmented both manually and semi-automatically. The values of cartilage thicknesses and volumes produced by these two methods were compared. Furthermore, the influences of possible geometrical differences on cartilage stresses and strains in the knee were evaluated with finite element modeling. The semi-automatic segmentation and 3D geometry construction of one knee joint (menisci, femoral and tibial cartilages) was approximately two times faster than with manual segmentation. Differences in cartilage thicknesses, volumes, contact pressures, stresses, and strains between segmentation methods in femoral and tibial cartilage were mostly insignificant (p > 0.05) and random, i.e. there were no systematic differences between the methods. In conclusion, the devised semi-automatic segmentation method is a quick and accurate way to determine cartilage geometries; it may become a valuable tool for biomechanical modeling applications with large patient groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage; finite element analysis; image segmentation; knee; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28895760     DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1375477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin        ISSN: 1025-5842            Impact factor:   1.763


  9 in total

Review 1.  Deciphering the "Art" in Modeling and Simulation of the Knee Joint: Overall Strategy.

Authors:  Ahmet Erdemir; Thor F Besier; Jason P Halloran; Carl W Imhauser; Peter J Laz; Tina M Morrison; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Unifying the seeds auto-generation (SAGE) with knee cartilage segmentation framework: data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Hong-Seng Gan; Khairil Amir Sayuti; Muhammad Hanif Ramlee; Yeng-Seng Lee; Wan Mahani Hafizah Wan Mahmud; Ahmad Helmy Abdul Karim
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Fully automated patellofemoral MRI segmentation using holistically nested networks: Implications for evaluating patellofemoral osteoarthritis, pain, injury, pathology, and adolescent development.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Natalia A Alexandridi; Richard M Smith; Aricia Shen; William Gandler; Evan McCreedy; Matthew J McAuliffe; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Deep learning-based fully automatic segmentation of wrist cartilage in MR images.

Authors:  Ekaterina Brui; Aleksandr Y Efimtcev; Vladimir A Fokin; Remi Fernandez; Anatoliy G Levchuk; Augustin C Ogier; Alexey A Samsonov; Jean P Mattei; Irina V Melchakova; David Bendahan; Anna Andreychenko
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Comparison between kinetic and kinetic-kinematic driven knee joint finite element models.

Authors:  Paul O Bolcos; Mika E Mononen; Ali Mohammadi; Mohammadhossein Ebrahimi; Matthew S Tanaka; Michael A Samaan; Richard B Souza; Xiaojuan Li; Juha-Sampo Suomalainen; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs; Rami K Korhonen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Design and validation of a semi-automatic bone segmentation algorithm from MRI to improve research efficiency.

Authors:  Lauren N Heckelman; Brian J Soher; Charles E Spritzer; Brian D Lewis; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  The effect of constitutive representations and structural constituents of ligaments on knee joint mechanics.

Authors:  Gustavo A Orozco; Petri Tanska; Mika E Mononen; Kimmo S Halonen; Rami K Korhonen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Image-based biomechanical models of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Andrea Cina; Matteo Panico; Domenico Albano; Carmelo Messina
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-08-13

9.  pyKNEEr: An image analysis workflow for open and reproducible research on femoral knee cartilage.

Authors:  Serena Bonaretti; Garry E Gold; Gary S Beaupre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.