Literature DB >> 31401218

Emmetropes and myopes differ little in their accommodation dynamics but strongly in their ciliary muscle morphology.

Sandra Wagner1, Eberhart Zrenner2, Torsten Strasser3.   

Abstract

Previous work suggested an association between near vision and myopia. We therefore investigated the accommodation process in emmetropes and myopes regarding morphologic changes of the ciliary muscle (CM) and power changes of the lens for different accommodation demands. The temporal CM of 18 emmetropic and 20 myopic students was imaged via anterior segment optical coherence tomography during far and near accommodation (2.5D, 3D, 4D). Additionally, accommodation dynamics to the stimuli pattern far-near-far (15 s each; 2.5D, 3D, 4D) were recorded with eccentric infrared photorefraction. OCT images were processed using custom-developed software facilitating the analysis of selective CM thickness (CMT) readings and CMT profiles. Anterior CMT readings were significantly smaller in myopes. Starting at 1.4 mm posterior to the scleral spur (SP), myopic CM became thicker than emmetropic. Anterior CMT changes (ΔCMT) continuously increased with accommodation demand in myopes while emmetropic ΔCMT only increased from 2.5D to 3D. Compared to emmetropes, myopes showed smaller ΔCMT but increased CM movement relative to SP. There were no significant differences between the groups for accommodation changes from far to near vision and vice versa, velocity, microfluctuations, power spectra or lag of accommodation. At 4 D, larger ΔCMT were associated with lower lens changes for disaccommodation. While CM shape, movement, and thickness showed distinct differences depending on refractive error, emmetropes and myopes did not differ in their dynamic accommodation. Further analysis is necessary to evaluate whether the CM's anatomical shape or predispositions in its intramuscular constituents are causative factors in myopigenesis.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accommodation; Ciliary muscle; Myopia; Near vision; Optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31401218     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Automated segmentation of the ciliary muscle in OCT images using fully convolutional networks.

Authors:  Iulen Cabeza-Gil; Marco Ruggeri; Yu-Cherng Chang; Begoña Calvo; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Ciliary Muscle Dimension Changes With Accommodation Vary in Myopia and Emmetropia.

Authors:  Dinesh Kaphle; Katrina L Schmid; Leon N Davies; Marwan Suheimat; David A Atchison
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.925

3.  Ciliary muscle thickness in adults with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Melissa D Bailey; Ruth E Manny; Chiu-Yen Kao
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.992

4.  Binocular dynamics of accommodation, convergence, and pupil size in myopes.

Authors:  Vahid Pourreza Ghoushchi; Juan Mompeán; Pedro M Prieto; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Assessing accommodative presbyopic biometric changes of the entire anterior segment using single swept-source OCT image acquisitions.

Authors:  Xiaobin Xie; William Sultan; Giulia Corradetti; Jong Yeon Lee; Abe Song; Anmol Pardeshi; Fei Yu; Vikas Chopra; Srinivas R Sadda; Benjamin Y Xu; Alex S Huang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Review of the application of the open-source software CilOCT for semi-automatic segmentation and analysis of the ciliary muscle in OCT images.

Authors:  Torsten Straßer; Sandra Wagner; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Age- and refraction-related changes in anterior segment anatomical structures measured by swept-source anterior segment OCT.

Authors:  Xiaobin Xie; Giulia Corradetti; Abe Song; Anmol Pardeshi; William Sultan; Jong Yeon Lee; Fei Yu; Lixia Zhang; Shuang Chen; Vikas Chopra; Srinivas R Sadda; Benjamin Xu; Alex S Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.