Literature DB >> 31400961

Idarubicin, cytarabine, and nivolumab in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a single-arm, phase 2 study.

Farhad Ravandi1, Rita Assi2, Naval Daver3, Christopher B Benton3, Tapan Kadia3, Philip A Thompson3, Gautam Borthakur3, Yesid Alvarado3, Elias J Jabbour3, Marina Konopleva3, Koichi Takahashi3, Steven Kornblau3, Courtney D DiNardo3, Zeev Estrov3, Wilmer Flores3, Sreyashi Basu3, James Allison3, Padmanee Sharma3, Sherry Pierce3, Allison Pike3, Jorge E Cortes3, Guillermo Garcia-Manero3, Hagop M Kantarjian3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for younger patients with acute myeloid leukaemia have moderately improved over the past two decades owing to better supportive care and recent introduction of novel targeted agents. Blocking PD-1 and its ligand's pathways enhances antileukaemia responses by enabling T cells in murine models. We aimed to assess the addition of nivolumab to frontline therapy with idarubicin and cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.
METHODS: This single-arm, phase 2 part of the phase 1-2 study of nivolumab in combination with idarubicin and cytarabine was done at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Eligible patients were aged 18-60 years (or >60 years if suitable for intensive chemotherapy), and had newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Induction included cytarabine 1·5 g/m2 by 24-h continuous infusion daily on days 1-4 (3 days in patients >60 years) and idarubicin 12 mg/m2 daily on days 1-3. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was started on day 24 (range 22-26) and continued every 2 weeks for up to a year in responders. Responders received either up to five consolidation cycles of attenuated doses of idarubicin and cytarabine, or allogeneic stem cell transplantation if eligible. The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Efficacy and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. Secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival and overall survival. This ongoing trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02464657.
FINDINGS: Between Aug 7, 2015, and June 2, 2018, 44 patients were enrolled of whom 22 (50%) had adverse genetic risk by European Leukaemia Network classification. All patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy. At a median follow-up of 17·25 months (IQR 0·50-30·40), median event-free survival was not reached (95% CI 7·93-NR). Median relapse-free survival of responders was 18·54 months (95% CI 8·20-23·22). The median overall survival was 18·54 months (95% CI 10·81-28·81). Six patients had seven grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events with two cases of rash, two of colitis, and one each of transaminitis, pancreatitis, and cholecystitis. 19 (43%) of 44 patients achieved a response and proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation, with grade 3-4 graft-versus-host disease observed in five (26%). No treatment related deaths were attributed to nivolumab.
INTERPRETATION: Addition of nivolumab to induction chemotherapy with idarubicin and cytarabine is feasible in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukaemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Post-transplant severe graft-versus-host disease could be improved, and earlier initiation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy is warranted in future studies. FUNDING: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant CA016672, and the MD Anderson Cancer Center Leukaemia SPORE CA100632 from the National Cancer Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31400961      PMCID: PMC6778960          DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30114-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


  29 in total

1.  Next-generation sequencing-based multigene mutational screening for acute myeloid leukemia using MiSeq: applicability for diagnostics and disease monitoring.

Authors:  Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Keyur P Patel; Neelima G Reddy; Varan Haghshenas; Mark J Routbort; Michael A Harmon; Bedia A Barkoh; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Farhad Ravandi; Jorge E Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Rajesh R Singh
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Peter L Greenberg; Heinz Tuechler; Julie Schanz; Guillermo Sanz; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Francesc Solé; John M Bennett; David Bowen; Pierre Fenaux; Francois Dreyfus; Hagop Kantarjian; Andrea Kuendgen; Alessandro Levis; Luca Malcovati; Mario Cazzola; Jaroslav Cermak; Christa Fonatsch; Michelle M Le Beau; Marilyn L Slovak; Otto Krieger; Michael Luebbert; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Silvia M M Magalhaes; Yasushi Miyazaki; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Mikkael Sekeres; Wolfgang R Sperr; Reinhard Stauder; Sudhir Tauro; Peter Valent; Teresa Vallespi; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Ulrich Germing; Detlef Haase
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Cytosine arabinoside (NSC-63878) and daunorubicin (NSC-83142) therapy in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  J W Yates; H J Wallace; R R Ellison; J F Holland
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1973 Nov-Dec

4.  Tim-3 is highly expressed in T cells in acute myeloid leukemia and associated with clinicopathological prognostic stratification.

Authors:  Caixia Li; Xiaochen Chen; Xiao Yu; Yibei Zhu; Chao Ma; Rui Xia; Jinfeng Ma; Caihong Gu; Lu Ye; Depei Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

5.  Coexpression of Tim-3 and PD-1 identifies a CD8+ T-cell exhaustion phenotype in mice with disseminated acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Qing Zhou; Meghan E Munger; Rachelle G Veenstra; Brenda J Weigel; Mitsuomi Hirashima; David H Munn; William J Murphy; Miyuki Azuma; Ana C Anderson; Vijay K Kuchroo; Bruce R Blazar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Emerging therapeutic drugs for AML.

Authors:  Eytan M Stein; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Phase II trial of vorinostat with idarubicin and cytarabine for patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Francesco Paolo Tambaro; Nebiyou B Bekele; Hui Yang; Farhad Ravandi; Elias Jabbour; Gautam Borthakur; Tapan M Kadia; Marina Y Konopleva; Stefan Faderl; Jorge E Cortes; Mark Brandt; Yumin Hu; Deborah McCue; Willie Mae Newsome; Sherry R Pierce; Marcos de Lima; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Attempts to optimize induction and consolidation treatment in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the MRC AML12 trial.

Authors:  Alan K Burnett; Robert K Hills; Donald W Milligan; Anthony H Goldstone; Archibald G Prentice; Mary-Frances McMullin; Andrew Duncombe; Brenda Gibson; Keith Wheatley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Resistance prediction in AML: analysis of 4601 patients from MRC/NCRI, HOVON/SAKK, SWOG and MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Authors:  R B Walter; M Othus; A K Burnett; B Löwenberg; H M Kantarjian; G J Ossenkoppele; R K Hills; F Ravandi; T Pabst; A Evans; S R Pierce; M-C Vekemans; F R Appelbaum; E H Estey
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  PD-1(hi)TIM-3(+) T cells associate with and predict leukemia relapse in AML patients post allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Y Kong; J Zhang; D F Claxton; W C Ehmann; W B Rybka; L Zhu; H Zeng; T D Schell; H Zheng
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 11.037

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Cytokines and costimulation in acute graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Hill; Motoko Koyama
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Immune-Based Therapeutic Interventions for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Fabiana Perna; Manuel R Espinoza-Gutarra; Giuseppe Bombaci; Sherif S Farag; Jennifer E Schwartz
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2022

3.  An Update on Immune Based Therapies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2021 and Beyond!

Authors:  Fadi Haddad; Naval Daver
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Phase II Trial of Pembrolizumab after High-Dose Cytarabine in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Jonathan S Serody; Ivana Gojo; Joshua F Zeidner; Benjamin G Vincent; Anastasia Ivanova; Dominic Moore; Karen P McKinnon; Alec D Wilkinson; Rupkatha Mukhopadhyay; Francesco Mazziotta; Hanna A Knaus; Matthew C Foster; Catherine C Coombs; Katarzyna Jamieson; Hendrik Van Deventer; Jonathan A Webster; Gabrielle T Prince; Amy E DeZern; B Douglas Smith; Mark J Levis; Nathan D Montgomery; Leo Luznik
Journal:  Blood Cancer Discov       Date:  2021-09-10

Review 5.  Immune escape and immunotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Luca Vago; Ivana Gojo
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  Myelodysplastic syndrome and immunotherapy novel to next in-line treatments.

Authors:  Katherine Linder; Premal Lulla
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  T-cell-based immunotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia: current concepts and future developments.

Authors:  Naval Daver; Ahmad S Alotaibi; Veit Bücklein; Marion Subklewe
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 8.  Checkpoint inhibitors in AML: are we there yet?

Authors:  Arnab Ghosh; Pere Barba; Miguel-Angel Perales
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 8.615

Review 9.  Immunotherapy in Myeloproliferative Diseases.

Authors:  Lukas M Braun; Robert Zeiser
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 10.  Immunotherapy in AML: a brief review on emerging strategies.

Authors:  A Moeinafshar; S Hemmati; N Rezaei
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.