Literature DB >> 34972969

An Update on Immune Based Therapies in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: 2021 and Beyond!

Fadi Haddad1, Naval Daver2.   

Abstract

Despite advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse is still widely observed and represents the major cause of death among patients with AML. Treatment options in the relapse setting are limited, still relying predominantly on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and cytotoxic chemotherapy, with poor outcomes. Novel targeted and venetoclax-based combinations are being investigated and have shown encouraging results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with low-intensity chemotherapy demonstrated encouraging response rates and survival among patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) AML, especially in the pre- and post-allo-HSCT setting. Blocking the CD47/SIRPα pathway is another strategy that showed robust anti-leukemic activity, with a response rate of around 70% and an encouraging median overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed, higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and patients with AML with a TP53 mutation. One approach that was proven to be very effective in the relapsed setting of lymphoid malignancies is chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. It relies on the infusion of genetically engineered T cells capable of recognizing specific epitopes on the surface of leukemia cells. In AML, different CAR constructs with different target antigens have been evaluated and demonstrated safety and feasibility in the R/R setting. However, the difficulty of potently targeting leukemic blasts in AML while sparing normal cells represents a major limitation to their use, and strategies are being tested to overcome this obstacle. A different approach is based on endogenously redirecting the patient's system cells to target and destroy leukemic cells via bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) or dual antigen receptor targeting (DARTs). Early results have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of these agents, and research is ongoing to develop BiTEs with longer half-life, allowing for less frequent administration schedules and developing them in earlier and lower disease burden settings.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AML; Azacitidine; BiTE; Checkpoint inhibitors; DART; Immunotherapy; Magrolimab; Nivolumab; Pembrolizumab; TriKE

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34972969     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-79308-1_9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  119 in total

Review 1.  Update on Immunotherapy in AML and MDS: Monoclonal Antibodies and Checkpoint Inhibitors Paving the Road for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Lucia Masarova; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi; Padmanee Sharma; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Naval Daver
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Frontline treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults.

Authors:  Gevorg Tamamyan; Tapan Kadia; Farhad Ravandi; Gautam Borthakur; Jorge Cortes; Elias Jabbour; Naval Daver; Maro Ohanian; Hagop Kantarjian; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  A bispecific approach to improving CAR T cells in AML.

Authors:  Naval Daver
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  A John Barrett; Minoo Battiwalla
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.929

5.  Has the prognosis of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia improved over years? A single institution experience of 784 consecutive patients over a 16-year period.

Authors:  M Baudard; A Beauchamp-Nicoud; A Delmer; B Rio; C Blanc; R Zittoun; J P Marie
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Intensive chemotherapy is not recommended for patients aged >60 years who have myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukemia with high-risk karyotypes.

Authors:  Sabine Knipp; Barbara Hildebrand; Andrea Kündgen; Aristoteles Giagounidis; Guido Kobbe; Rainer Haas; Carlo Aul; Norbert Gattermann; Ulrich Germing
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Myeloid malignancies: mutations, models and management.

Authors:  Anne Murati; Mandy Brecqueville; Raynier Devillier; Marie-Joelle Mozziconacci; Véronique Gelsi-Boyer; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Graft-versus-Leukemia Effect Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Leukemia.

Authors:  Anne M Dickinson; Jean Norden; Shuang Li; Ilona Hromadnikova; Christoph Schmid; Helga Schmetzer; Hans Jochem-Kolb
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Recent Treatment Advances and the Role of Nanotechnology, Combination Products, and Immunotherapy in Changing the Therapeutic Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Kent T J Chen; Roger Gilabert-Oriol; Marcel B Bally; Ada W Y Leung
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Validation and refinement of the revised 2017 European LeukemiaNet genetic risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Tobias Herold; Maja Rothenberg-Thurley; Victoria V Grunwald; Hanna Janke; Dennis Goerlich; Maria C Sauerland; Nikola P Konstandin; Annika Dufour; Stephanie Schneider; Michaela Neusser; Bianka Ksienzyk; Philipp A Greif; Marion Subklewe; Andreas Faldum; Stefan K Bohlander; Jan Braess; Bernhard Wörmann; Utz Krug; Wolfgang E Berdel; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Karsten Spiekermann; Klaus H Metzeler
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 11.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.