Literature DB >> 31399220

Examining the relationship between lymph node harvest and survival in patients undergoing colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma.

Maude Trepanier1, Arman Erkan2, Araz Kouyoumdjian3, George Nassif2, Matthew Albert2, John Monson2, Lawrence Lee4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current standards for lymph node harvest in colorectal cancer surgery may be inadequate. Higher lymph node yield may improve survival, but the number of lymph nodes needed to optimize survival is unknown. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between lymph node yield and overall survival in patients undergoing colectomy for nonmetastatic colon adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: The 2010 to 2014 National Cancer Database was queried for patients undergoing colectomy for nonmetastatic colon adenocarcinoma. Adjusted restricted cubic splines were used to model the nonlinear relationship between lymph node harvest and overall survival. Cox proportional hazard determined independent predictors of overall survival.
RESULTS: A total of 261,423 patients were included. Restricted cubic splines demonstrated that the adjusted improvements in overall survival stabilized after 24 nodes. Patients were divided into: <12, 12 to 23, and ≥24 nodes. On survival analysis, patients with ≥24 nodes had better survival across all N stages compared to other groups (P < .001). Lymph node harvest ≥24 nodes was independently associated with improved overall survival compared to 12 to 23 nodes (hazard ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.85).
CONCLUSION: Lymph node harvest ≥24 nodes is associated with improved survival in colorectal cancer patients. These data may provide indirect evidence for a more extensive lymphadenectomy for colon cancer.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31399220     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  9 in total

1.  Metastasis to lymph nodes around the vascular tie worsens long-term oncological outcomes following complete mesocolic excision and conventional colectomy for right-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Serkan Zenger; Erman Aytac; Bulent Gurbuz; Volkan Ozben; Emre Ozoran; Bilgi Baca; Emre Balik; Ismail Hamzaoglu; Tayfun Karahasanoglu; Dursun Bugra
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Prognostic Impact of the Number of Examined Lymph Nodes in Stage II Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Purun Lei; Ying Ruan; Jianpei Liu; Qixian Zhang; Xiao Tang; Juekun Wu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Stage II colon cancer staging using the number of retrieved lymph nodes may be superior to current TNM staging for prognosis stratification: the Japanese study group for postoperative follow-up of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shimpei Ogawa; Michio Itabashi; Yoshiko Bamba; Kimitaka Tani; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Shinichi Yamauchi; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Pathologic Complete Response Despite Nodal Yield Has Best Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sumana Narayanan; Kristopher Attwood; Emmanuel Gabriel; Steven Nurkin
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Stage migration resulting from inadequate number of examined lymph nodes impacts prognosis in stage II colon cancer after radical surgery.

Authors:  Di Xie; Xiangping Song; Lingling Tong
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A Prediction Model for Tumor Recurrence in Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer Patients: From a Machine Learning Model to Genomic Profiling.

Authors:  Po-Chuan Chen; Yu-Min Yeh; Bo-Wen Lin; Ren-Hao Chan; Pei-Fang Su; Yi-Chia Liu; Chung-Ta Lee; Shang-Hung Chen; Peng-Chan Lin
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Is increasing nodal count associated with improved recurrence-free and overall survival following standard right hemicolectomy for colon cancer?

Authors:  Ian P Hayes; Elasma Milanzi; Peter Gibbs; Ian Faragher; Jeanette C Reece
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 2.885

8.  Development and External Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Recurrence-Free Survival After R0 Resection for Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: An International Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Bin-Bin Xu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Mark J Truty; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Interactions of occult tumor spread and surgical technique on overall and disease-free survival in patients operated for stage I and II right-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  G S Banipal; B V Stimec; S N Andersen; A E Faerden; B Edwin; J Baral; J Šaltytė Benth; D Ignjatovic
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.553

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.