Jessie P Buckley1, Hyunju Kim2, Eugenia Wong3, Casey M Rebholz3. 1. Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jessie.buckley@jhu.edu. 2. Center for Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultra-processed food has low nutritional quality, is associated with development of chronic diseases, and may increase exposure to chemicals used in food packaging and production. OBJECTIVES: To assess associations of ultra-processed food consumption with exposure to phthalates and bisphenols, including newer replacements, in the general U.S. METHODS: Among 2212 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014 participants (≥6 years), we classified items reported in a 24-h dietary recall according to the NOVA food processing classification system and calculated energy intake from ultra-processed food. Urinary concentrations of mono-benzyl (MBzP), mono-(3-carboxypropyl) (MCPP), mono-(carboxyisononyl) (MCNP), mono-(carboxyisoctyl) (MCOP), and four metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl) (∑DEHP) phthalates and bisphenols A, F, and S were measured in spot urine samples. We estimated percent changes in natural log creatinine-standardized concentrations per 10% higher energy from ultra-processed food in covariate-adjusted multivariable linear regression models. We examined effect measure modification by age group, race/ethnicity, and poverty:income ratio and assessed associations with minimally processed food intake. RESULTS: In adjusted models, higher energy from ultra-processed food was associated with higher urinary concentrations of MCPP, MCNP, and MCOP but not MBzP, ∑DEHP, or bisphenols. Each 10% higher energy from ultra-processed food was associated with 8.0% (95% CI: 5.6%, 10.3%) higher urinary MCOP concentrations, with a stronger association among children than adolescents or adults. Ultra-processed sandwiches/hamburgers, French fries/other potato products, and ice cream/pops were associated with higher concentrations of multiple chemicals. Higher energy from minimally processed food was associated with lower concentrations of MCPP, MCNP, MCOP, and bisphenols A and F. DISCUSSION: Ultra-processed food consumption may increase exposure to currently used phthalates. Additional research is needed to determine whether minimally processed food diets or changes in food production practices can reduce phthalate and bisphenol exposures and related health effects, particularly among children who are more vulnerable to toxicants and tend to consume more ultra-processed food than adults.
BACKGROUND: Ultra-processed food has low nutritional quality, is associated with development of chronic diseases, and may increase exposure to chemicals used in food packaging and production. OBJECTIVES: To assess associations of ultra-processed food consumption with exposure to phthalates and bisphenols, including newer replacements, in the general U.S. METHODS: Among 2212 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014 participants (≥6 years), we classified items reported in a 24-h dietary recall according to the NOVA food processing classification system and calculated energy intake from ultra-processed food. Urinary concentrations of mono-benzyl (MBzP), mono-(3-carboxypropyl) (MCPP), mono-(carboxyisononyl) (MCNP), mono-(carboxyisoctyl) (MCOP), and four metabolites of di(2-ethylhexyl) (∑DEHP) phthalates and bisphenols A, F, and S were measured in spot urine samples. We estimated percent changes in natural log creatinine-standardized concentrations per 10% higher energy from ultra-processed food in covariate-adjusted multivariable linear regression models. We examined effect measure modification by age group, race/ethnicity, and poverty:income ratio and assessed associations with minimally processed food intake. RESULTS: In adjusted models, higher energy from ultra-processed food was associated with higher urinary concentrations of MCPP, MCNP, and MCOP but not MBzP, ∑DEHP, or bisphenols. Each 10% higher energy from ultra-processed food was associated with 8.0% (95% CI: 5.6%, 10.3%) higher urinary MCOP concentrations, with a stronger association among children than adolescents or adults. Ultra-processed sandwiches/hamburgers, French fries/other potato products, and ice cream/pops were associated with higher concentrations of multiple chemicals. Higher energy from minimally processed food was associated with lower concentrations of MCPP, MCNP, MCOP, and bisphenols A and F. DISCUSSION: Ultra-processed food consumption may increase exposure to currently used phthalates. Additional research is needed to determine whether minimally processed food diets or changes in food production practices can reduce phthalate and bisphenol exposures and related health effects, particularly among children who are more vulnerable to toxicants and tend to consume more ultra-processed food than adults.
Authors: Anna Kjerstine Rosenmai; Marianne Dybdahl; Mikael Pedersen; Barbara Medea Alice van Vugt-Lussenburg; Eva Bay Wedebye; Camilla Taxvig; Anne Marie Vinggaard Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2014-02-22 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Holger M Koch; Matthew Lorber; Krista L Y Christensen; Claudia Pälmke; Stephan Koslitz; Thomas Brüning Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Luísa Correia-Sá; Monika Kasper-Sonnenberg; André Schütze; Claudia Pälmke; Sónia Norberto; Conceição Calhau; Valentina F Domingues; Holger M Koch Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Deborah J Watkins; Melissa Eliot; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Antonia M Calafat; Kimberly Yolton; Bruce P Lanphear; Joseph M Braun Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2014-07-09 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Emily S Barrett; Matthew Corsetti; Drew Day; Sally W Thurston; Christine T Loftus; Catherine J Karr; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Kaja Z LeWinn; Alicia K Smith; Roger Smith; Frances A Tylavsky; Nicole R Bush; Sheela Sathyanarayana Journal: Environ Int Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Katherine W Reeves; Gabriela Vieyra; Nydjie P Grimes; Jaymie Meliker; Rebecca D Jackson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Robert Wallace; R Thomas Zoeller; Carol Bigelow; Susan E Hankinson; JoAnn E Manson; Jane A Cauley; Antonia M Calafat Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 5.958