Literature DB >> 31396777

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear and Angular Measurements in Virtual Reality: a Validation Study.

Asif Ahmed Anik1, Brian A Xavier2, Jan Hansmann2, Emmanuel Ansong3, Jinsong Chen4, Linping Zhao5, Edward Michals2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study is to validate linear and angular measurements acquired in a virtual reality (VR) environment via a comparison with the physical measurements. The hypotheses tested are as follows: VR linear and angular measurements (1) are equivalent to the corresponding physical measurements and (2) achieve a high degree of reproducibility. Both virtual and physical measurements were performed by two raters in four different sessions. A total of 40 linear and 15 angular measurements were acquired from three physical objects (an L-block, a hand model, and a dry skull) via the use of fiducial markers on selected locations. After both intra- and inter-rater reliability were evaluated using inter-class coefficient (ICC), equivalence between virtual and physical measurements was analyzed via paired t test and Bland-Altman plots. The accuracy of the virtual measurements was further estimated using two one-sided tests (TOST) procedure. The reproducibility of virtual measurements was evaluated via ICC as well as the repeatability coefficient. Virtual reality measurements were equivalent to physical measurements as evidenced by a paired t test with p values of 0.413 for linear and 0.533 for angular measurements and Bland-Altman plots in all three objects. The accuracy of virtual measurements was estimated to be 0.5 mm for linear and 0.7° for angular measurements, respectively. Reproducibility in VR measurements was high as evidenced by ICC of 1.00 for linear and 0.99 for angular measurements, respectively. Both linear and angular measurements in the VR environment are equivalent to the physical measurements with high accuracy and reproducibility.

Keywords:  Accuracy; Equivalence; Measurements; Reproducibility; Validation; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31396777      PMCID: PMC7064653          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00259-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  16 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Applications of 3-dimensional virtual computerized tomography technology in oral and maxillofacial surgery: current therapy.

Authors:  Gary Orentlicher; Douglas Goldsmith; Andrew Horowitz
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable?

Authors:  Vanessa A Scholtes; Caroline B Terwee; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 4.  Virtual Reality and Medical Inpatients: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Julieta Dascal; Mark Reid; Waguih William IsHak; Brennan Spiegel; Jennifer Recacho; Bradley Rosen; Itai Danovitch
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01

5.  Interventional Radiology Training Using a Dynamic Medical Immersive Training Environment (DynaMITE).

Authors:  Colin J McCarthy; Alvin Y C Yu; Synho Do; Steven L Dawson; Raul N Uppot
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Use of virtual 3-dimensional surgery in post-traumatic craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Oren M Tepper; Sarah Sorice; Gabriel N Hershman; Pierre Saadeh; Jamie P Levine; David Hirsch
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  A Virtual Reality Environment to Visualize Three-Dimensional Patient-Specific Models by a Mobile Head-Mounted Display.

Authors:  Maurizio Vertemati; Simone Cassin; Francesco Rizzetto; Angelo Vanzulli; Marco Elli; Gianluca Sampogna; Maurizio Gallieni
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 8.  Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Training in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  Florence Aïm; Guillaume Lonjon; Didier Hannouche; Rémy Nizard
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 9.  Head-Mounted Virtual Reality and Mental Health: Critical Review of Current Research.

Authors:  Shaun W Jerdan; Mark Grindle; Hugo C van Woerden; Maged N Kamel Boulos
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.143

10.  Measurement Tools for the Immersive Visualization Environment: Steps Toward the Virtual Laboratory.

Authors:  John G Hagedorn; Joy P Dunkers; Steven G Satterfield; Adele P Peskin; John T Kelso; Judith E Terrill
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2007-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.