| Literature DB >> 31396209 |
Aritania S Santos1, Edecio Cunha Neto2,3, Rosa T Fukui1, Ludmila R P Ferreira4, Maria Elizabeth R Silva1.
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRs) are master regulators of post-transcriptional gene expression, and they are often dysregulated in individuals suffering from diabetes. We investigated the roles of miR-101-3p and miR-204-5p, both of which negatively regulate insulin secretion and cell survival and are highly expressed in pancreatic β cells, in the context of type 1 diabetes (T1D) pathogenesis. Using quantitative real time PCR, we evaluated serum levels of miR-101-3p and miR-204-5p in four groups, including recent-onset T1D patients (T1D group; n = 50), individuals with normal glucose levels expressing one islet autoantibody (Ab) (single Ab group; n = 26) or multiple autoantibodies (multiple Ab group; n = 12), and healthy controls (control group; n = 43). An in silico analysis was performed to identify potential target genes of these miRNAs and to delineate enriched pathways. The relative expression of serum miR-101-3p was approximately three times higher in the multiple Ab and T1D groups than that in the single Ab and control groups (p < 0.0001). When considering all groups together, miR-101-3p expression was positively correlated with the level of islet autoantibodies GADA (r = 0.267; p = 0.0027) and IA-2A (r = 0.291; p = 0.001), and the expression of the miRNA was not correlated with levels of ZnT8A (r = 0.125; p = 0.183). miR-101-3p expression did not correlate with HbA1c (r = 0.178; p = 0.052) or glucose levels (r = 0.177; p = 0.051). No significant differences were observed in miR-204-5p expression among the analyzed groups. Computational analysis of the miR-101-3p target gene pathways indicated a potential activation of the HGF/c-Met, Ephrin receptor, and STAT3 signaling pathways. Our study demonstrated that the circulating levels of miR-101-3p are higher in T1D patients and in individuals with normal glucose levels, testing positive for multiple autoantibodies, indicating that miR-101-3p precedes loss of glucose homeostasis. The pathogenic role of miR-101-3p in T1D may involve multiple molecular pathways.Entities:
Keywords: autoantibodies; autoimmunity; miR-101-3p; miR-204-5p; microRNA; qRT-PCR; type 1 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31396209 PMCID: PMC6665278 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Demographic and clinical features of type 1 diabetes, islet autoantibody-positive and healthy control groups.
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 77 (74–83) | 85 (78–88.5) | 87 (80.75–94) | 105 (77.5–201.5) | 0.0001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.5 (5.15–5.87) | 5,25 (5.01–5.47) | 5.2 (4.74–5.5) | 7.9(6.45–9.12) | <0.0001 |
| IAA (nU/mL) | 0 (0–20) | 39.5 (0–126.30) | 101.5 (51.75–167.3) | <0.0001 | |
| GAD65A (IU/mL) | 0 (0–1.5) | 3.75 (0–62.88) | 228.8 (35.63–729.4) | 154(58.3–435.0) | <0.0001 |
| ZnT8Ab (IU/mL) | 2.6 (0–6) | 3.4 (1–17.6) | 528.5 (7.82–888) | 498 (37–856) | <0.0001 |
| IA−2A (IU/mL) | 1.8 (0–12.5) | 0 (0–25) | 168 (9–306.3) | 567.5 (192.8–1936) | <0.0001 |
| C–peptide (ng/dL) | 2.3 (1.7–3.0) | 2 (1.1–2.8) | 1.7 (1.1–3.2) | 0.65 (0.48–1.20) | <0.0001 |
| Age (years) | 15.82 ± 5.98 | 15.09 ± 8.00 | 15.96 ± 8.11 | 13.0 ± 6.52 | 0.115 |
| Male/female | 17/26 | 15/11 | 9/3 | 24/26 | 0.134 |
| HLA–DR3 or DR4 alleles | 29.03% | 63.2% | 90.0% | 88.9% | <0.0001 |
Data are presented as median and inter-quartile range or mean ± standard deviation. Single Ab, individuals presenting one islet autoantibody; Multiple Ab, individuals presenting two or more islet autoantibodies; T1D, type 1 diabetes; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; IAA, insulin autoantibody (Normal value = ≤ 100 U/mL); GAD65A, glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (NV ≤ 25 IU/mL); ZnT8A, zinc transporter-8 autoantibody (NV ≤ 16 IU/mL); IA-2A, tyrosine phosphatase autoantibody (NV ≤ 125 IU/mL).
T1D vs. Control p < 0.05;
T1D vs. Single Ab p < 0.05;
T1D × Multiple Ab p < 0.05;
Multiple Ab × Single Ab p < 0.05;
Multiple Ab × Control p < 0.05;
Single Ab × Control p < 0.05.
Figure 1(A) Relative expression of serum miR-101-3p (A) in healthy controls (n = 41), individuals without diabetes expressing one single autoantibody (single Ab) (n = 22) or multiple autoantibodies (multiple Ab) (n = 12) and patients with recent type 1 diabetes (T1D) (n = 48). (B) Relative expression of serum miR-204-5p in healthy controls (n = 42), individuals without diabetes expressing a single autoantibody (single Ab) (n = 24) or multiple autoantibodies (multiple Ab) (n = 9), and patients with recent type 1 diabetes (T1D) (n = 46) *p < 0.05, **, ***p < 0.0001. Fold change: the qRT-PCR data were presented as relative quantification using the comparative method as 2−ΔΔ for each miRNA (relative expression-fold change) as described (25). The control group was used as a calibrator in the 2−ΔΔ method for comparison between the T1D and Ab positive groups, and therefore, the relative expression in each sample was calculated with respect to the mean expression value for healthy controls (adjusted value 1) and presented as fold change. Fold change calculation for individual samples of the control group was calculated by obtaining the ΔΔCt value as performed for T1D samples and described in http://www.barbaradaviscenter.org.
Figure 2Progression to type 1 diabetes: miR-101-3p, islet autoantibodies, and glucose serum profile. Serum levels of glucose (A), relative expression of miR-10-3p (B), levels of autoantibodies against zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8A—Normal values-NV ≤ 16 IU/mL) (C), tyrosine phosphatase (IA-2A—NV ≤ 125 IU/mL) (D), glutamic acid 65 decarboxylase (GADA—NV ≤ 25 IU/mL) (E), and insulin (IAA—NV ≤ 100 IU/mL) (F) before and after type 1 diabetes diagnosis. Each symbol type represents one patient over time (patient one to nine). Each individual was represented with the same symbol in the various graphs in this figure.
Figure 3Correlations of serum miR-101-3p relative expression with age (A) and levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (B) and glucose (C) levels in healthy controls, individuals without diabetes expressing one single autoantibody (single Ab) or multiple autoantibodies (multiple Ab), and patients with recent type 1 diabetes (T1D). The number of determinations related to age, HbA1c, and glucose levels are presented in parenthesis for healthy controls (n = 41, 39, 41), single Ab (n = 22, 20, 21), multiple Ab (n = 12, 12, 12), and T1D groups (n = 48, 47, 47). Fold change: the qRT-PCR data were presented as relative quantification using the comparative method as 2−ΔΔ for each miRNA (relative expression-fold change) as described (25). The control group was used as a calibrator in the 2−ΔΔ method for comparison between the T1D and Ab positive groups, and therefore, the relative expression in each sample was calculated with respect to the mean expression value for healthy controls (adjusted value 1) and was presented as fold change. Fold change calculation for individual samples of the control group was determined by obtaining the ΔΔCt value as performed for T1D samples and described in http://www.barbaradaviscenter.org.
Figure 4Correlations of serum miR-101-3p relative expression with autoantibodies: anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase GADA (NV ≤ 25 IU/mL) (n = 123) (A), anti-zinc transporter 8- ZnT8A (Normal values-NV ≤ 16 IU/mL) (n = 115) (B), and anti-tyrosine phosphatase IA-2A (NV ≤ 125 IU/mL) (n = 121) (C) in the entire cohort. Fold change: the qRT-PCR data were presented as relative quantification using the comparative method as 2−ΔΔ for each miRNA (relative expression-fold change) as described (25). The control group was used as a calibrator in the 2−ΔΔ method for comparison between the T1D and Ab positive groups, and therefore, the relative expression in each sample was calculated with respect to the mean expression value for healthy controls (adjusted value 1) and was presented as fold change. Fold change calculation for individual samples of the control group was determined by obtaining the ΔΔCt value as performed for T1D samples and described in http://www.barbaradaviscenter.org.
Figure 5Potential canonical pathways enriched in autoimmune type 1 diabetes. Canonical pathways of putative miR-101-3p targets (A). Additional pathways that may be associated with type 1 diabetes pathogenesis; (B) Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF); MET proto-oncogene (HGF receptor); Growth factor receptor bound protein 2 associated binding protein 1 (GAB1); Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC1); prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (COX2); Fos proto-oncogene (c-FOS); Ephrin receptor signaling (Eph), STAT3 (Signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway).