| Literature DB >> 31396185 |
Li-Na Zhang1, Da-Cheng Wang1, Qiang Hu1, Xiang-Qun Dai1, Yue-Sheng Xie1, Qing Li2, Hua-Mei Liu2, Jian-Hua Guo1.
Abstract
Beneficial microorganisms have been extensively used to make plants more resistant to abiotic and biotic stress. We previously identified a consortium of three plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains (Bacillus cereus AR156, Bacillus subtilis SM21, and Serratia sp. XY21; hereafter "BBS") as a promising and environmentally friendly biocontrol agent. In this study, the effect of BBS on a soil-borne disease of sweet pepper was evaluated. Application of BBS significantly reduced the prevalence of phytophthora blight and improved fruit quality and soil properties relative to the control. BBS was able to alter the soil bacterial community: it significantly increased the abundances of Burkholderia, Comamonas, and Ramlibacter, which were negatively associated with disease severity, relative to the control. A redundancy analysis suggested that BBS-treated soil samples were dominated by Burkholderia, Comamonas, Ramlibacter, Sporichthya, Achromobacter, and Pontibacter; abundance of these genera was related to total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), ammonium nitrogen (AN), total potassium (TP), and available phosphorus (AP) contents. This suggests that BBS treatment shifted the microbe community to one that suppressed soil-borne disease and improved the soil chemical properties.Entities:
Keywords: BBS; disease prevalence; rhizosphere soils; soil properties; sweet pepper
Year: 2019 PMID: 31396185 PMCID: PMC6664061 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Effects of different fertilization management programs on disease (A) and yield (B) of sweet pepper in 2014–2016. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences between different treatments are indicated as different letters on top of the data bars. The statistical analysis was determined by a Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) test: α = 0.05, n = 3.
FIGURE 2Effects of BBS management on content of chlorophyll (A) and fruit quality (B–D) of sweet pepper. Fruit quality of sweet pepper include content of soluble sugar (B), soluble solids (C), and Vitamin C (D). Significant differences between different treatments are indicated as different letters on top of the data bars. The statistical analysis was determined by a Tukey’s Studentized Range (HSD) test: α = 0.05, n = 3.
Physicochemical properties of soil samples under the different treatments.
| CK | 103.51 ± 1.66b | 60.04 ± 0.96b | 9.65 ± 0.83a | 431.52 ± 2.01a | 19.02 ± 0.12b | 4.89 ± 0.18a | 0.82 ± 0.01b | 14.06 ± 0.16a | 1.38 ± 0.01b |
| BBS | 123.81 ± 3.83a | 71.81 ± 2.22a | 10.54 ± 0.76a | 443.13 ± 5.57a | 25.84 ± 1.01a | 4.94 ± 0.18a | 1.11 ± 0.04a | 14.13 ± 0.13a | 1.52 ± 0.02a |
FIGURE 3The bacterial microbial community compositions of the different treatments.
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between rhizosphere abundant genus and disease incidence.
| 0.845* | |
| 0.897∗∗ | |
| −0.847* | |
| 0.784* | |
| 0.787* | |
| 0.645* | |
| −0.739* | |
| −0.92∗∗ | |
| −0.864* | |
| −0.854* | |
| −0.793* | |
| 0.930* | |
| 0.78* |
FIGURE 4Relative abundance of disease-related genus in rhizosphere. Significant differences between different treatments are indicated as different letters on top of the data bars. The statistical analysis was determined by one-side T-test with 5% FDR (+p < 0.1, *p < 0.05, and ∗∗p < 0.01).
FIGURE 5Redundancy analysis of soil properties, soil properties and analyzed rhizosphere soil genera bacterial. Soil property: TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; AN, ammonia nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; AP, available phosphorus.