Literature DB >> 31393215

Disparities in the Prevalence of Excess Heart Age Among Women with a Recent Live Birth.

Jonetta Johnson Mpofu1,2, Ruben A Smith1, Deesha Patel3, Cathleen Gillespie4, Shanna Cox1, Matthew Ritchey2,4, Quanhe Yang4, Brian Morrow1, Wanda Barfield1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Understanding and addressing cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk has implications for maternal and child health outcomes. Heart age, the modeled age of an individual's cardiovascular system based on risk level, and excess heart age, the difference between a person's heart age and chronological age, are alternative simplified ways to communicate CVD risk. Among women with a recent live birth, we predicted heart age, calculated prevalence of excess heart age (≥5 years), and examined factors associated with excess heart age. Materials and
Methods: Data were analyzed in 2017 from 2009 to 2014 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). To calculate heart age we used maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, and diabetic status. Weighted prevalence and prevalence ratios compared the likelihood of excess heart age across racial/ethnic groups by selected factors.
Results: Prevalence of excess heart age was higher in non-Hispanic black women (11.8%) than non-Hispanic white women (7.3%, prevalence ratio [PR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62, 1.49-1.76) and Hispanic women (4.9%, PR, 95% CI: 2.39, 2.10-2.72). Prevalence of excess heart age was highest among women who were without health insurance, obese or overweight, engaged in physical activity less than thrice per week, or were smokers in the prepregnancy period. Among women with less than high school education, non-Hispanic black women had a higher prevalence of excess heart age than Hispanic women (PR, 95% CI: 4.01, 3.15-5.10). Conclusions: Excess heart age may be an important tool for decreasing disparities and encouraging CVD risk reduction among certain groups of women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular health; heart age; maternal and child health; reproductive health

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31393215      PMCID: PMC8145772          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  45 in total

1.  Pregnancy complications and calculated cardiovascular risk in urban women: do we envisage an association?

Authors:  Prerna Bhasin; Satwanti Kapoor
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Maternal mortality from preeclampsia/eclampsia.

Authors:  Labib Ghulmiyyah; Baha Sibai
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Obstetric and Neonatal Risks Among Obese Women Without Chronic Disease.

Authors:  Sung Soo Kim; Yeyi Zhu; Katherine L Grantz; Stefanie N Hinkle; Zhen Chen; Maeve E Wallace; Melissa M Smarr; Nikira M Epps; Pauline Mendola
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Healthy lifestyle and the risk of stroke in women.

Authors:  Tobias Kurth; Steven C Moore; J Michael Gaziano; Carlos S Kase; Meir J Stampfer; Klaus Berger; Julie E Buring
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-10

6.  Cardiovascular disease risk is only elevated in hypertensive, formerly preeclamptic women.

Authors:  N M Breetveld; C Ghossein-Doha; Smj van Kuijk; A P van Dijk; M J van der Vlugt; W M Heidema; R R Scholten; M E A Spaanderman
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Maternal Antihypertensive Medication Use and Congenital Heart Defects: Updated Results From the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Sarah C Fisher; Alissa R Van Zutphen; Martha M Werler; Angela E Lin; Paul A Romitti; Charlotte M Druschel; Marilyn L Browne
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 8.  A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Connor Gorber; M Tremblay; D Moher; B Gorber
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.213

9.  Patterns of outpatient antihypertensive medication use during pregnancy in a Medicaid population.

Authors:  Brian T Bateman; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Krista F Huybrechts; Kristin Palmsten; Helen Mogun; Jeffrey L Ecker; Michael A Fischer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Pre-pregnancy Body Mass Index (BMI) and delivery outcomes in a Canadian population.

Authors:  Angela Vinturache; Nadia Moledina; Sheila McDonald; Donna Slater; Suzanne Tough
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.