BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a single linear relationship between mean plasma glucose (MPG) and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)). We examined the relationship in different treatment groups of patients with type 1 diabetes participating in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). METHODS:Seven-point glucose profiles (premeal, postmeal, and bedtime) and HbA(1c) were measured quarterly during the DCCT. We studied measurements from (a) intensively treated patients at study commencement, (b) intensively treated patients after stabilization of their glycemia (from 6 months onward), and (c) conventionally treated patients from 6 months onward. Only complete glucose profile and HbA(1c) pairings were considered (n = 589, 11 483, and 11 855, respectively). RESULTS: From 6 months into the trial, conventionally treated patients had consistently higher MPG concentrations than intensively treated patients at any given HbA(1c) value (mean difference, 1.6 mmol/L at 7% HbA(1c), increasing to 2.8 mmol/L at 11% HbA(1c)). Similarly, at the same HbA(1c), the MPG of intensively treated patients at baseline was higher than in the same individuals after 6 months of intensive treatment (1.2 mmol/L difference at 7% HbA(1c), increasing to 4.6 mmol/L at 11% HbA(1c)). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between MPG and HbA(1c) is not constant but differs depending on the glycemic control of the population being studied. Having lower mean glucose at the same HbA(1c) may help explain why intensive DCCT treatment appeared intrinsically linked to both increased hypoglycemia and decreased microvascular complications compared with conventional treatment. These findings may also have implications for expressing HbA(1c) as mean blood glucose equivalent.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a single linear relationship between mean plasma glucose (MPG) and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)). We examined the relationship in different treatment groups of patients with type 1 diabetes participating in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). METHODS: Seven-point glucose profiles (premeal, postmeal, and bedtime) and HbA(1c) were measured quarterly during the DCCT. We studied measurements from (a) intensively treated patients at study commencement, (b) intensively treated patients after stabilization of their glycemia (from 6 months onward), and (c) conventionally treated patients from 6 months onward. Only complete glucose profile and HbA(1c) pairings were considered (n = 589, 11 483, and 11 855, respectively). RESULTS: From 6 months into the trial, conventionally treated patients had consistently higher MPG concentrations than intensively treated patients at any given HbA(1c) value (mean difference, 1.6 mmol/L at 7% HbA(1c), increasing to 2.8 mmol/L at 11% HbA(1c)). Similarly, at the same HbA(1c), the MPG of intensively treated patients at baseline was higher than in the same individuals after 6 months of intensive treatment (1.2 mmol/L difference at 7% HbA(1c), increasing to 4.6 mmol/L at 11% HbA(1c)). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between MPG and HbA(1c) is not constant but differs depending on the glycemic control of the population being studied. Having lower mean glucose at the same HbA(1c) may help explain why intensive DCCT treatment appeared intrinsically linked to both increased hypoglycemia and decreased microvascular complications compared with conventional treatment. These findings may also have implications for expressing HbA(1c) as mean blood glucose equivalent.
Authors: Roy W Beck; Crystal G Connor; Deborah M Mullen; David M Wesley; Richard M Bergenstal Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: J K Snell-Bergeon; R Roman; D Rodbard; S Garg; D M Maahs; I E Schauer; B C Bergman; G L Kinney; M Rewers Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Robert M Cohen; Robert S Franco; Paramjit K Khera; Eric P Smith; Christopher J Lindsell; Peter J Ciraolo; Mary B Palascak; Clinton H Joiner Journal: Blood Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 22.113