Ian Cowell1, Alison McGregor1, Peter O'Sullivan2,3, Kieran O'Sullivan4,5, Ross Poyton1, Veronika Schoeb6, Ged Murtagh1. 1. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 2. School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Bentley Perth, WA, Australia. 3. Bodylogic Physiotherapy, Shenton Park, Perth, WA, Australia. 4. School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. 5. Sports Spine Centre, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar. 6. School of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Abstract
Background: Guidelines advocate that non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) be considered within a multi-dimensional bio-psychosocial (BPS) framework. This BPS approach advocates incorporating the patient's perspective as part of the treatment process. 'Agenda setting' has been introduced as the key to understanding patients' concerns in medical encounters; however, this has received little attention in physiotherapy. This study explored how physiotherapists solicit and respond to the agenda of concerns that patients with NSCLBP bring to initial encounters. Method: The research setting was primary care. Twenty initial physiotherapy consultations were video-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using conversation analysis, a qualitative observational method. Both verbal and non-verbal features of the interaction were considered. Results: This data highlights a spectrum of communication styles ranging from more physiotherapist-focused, where the physiotherapists did not attend to patients' concerns, to a more patient-focused style, which provided greater opportunities for patients to voice their concerns. On occasions, patients were willing to pursue their own agenda when their concern was initially overlooked. Conclusion: This study provides empirical evidence on communication patterns in physiotherapy practice. A more collaborative style of communication with a shared conversational agenda provided patients with the conversational space to describe their concerns more fully.
Background: Guidelines advocate that non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) be considered within a multi-dimensional bio-psychosocial (BPS) framework. This BPS approach advocates incorporating the patient's perspective as part of the treatment process. 'Agenda setting' has been introduced as the key to understanding patients' concerns in medical encounters; however, this has received little attention in physiotherapy. This study explored how physiotherapists solicit and respond to the agenda of concerns that patients with NSCLBP bring to initial encounters. Method: The research setting was primary care. Twenty initial physiotherapy consultations were video-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using conversation analysis, a qualitative observational method. Both verbal and non-verbal features of the interaction were considered. Results: This data highlights a spectrum of communication styles ranging from more physiotherapist-focused, where the physiotherapists did not attend to patients' concerns, to a more patient-focused style, which provided greater opportunities for patients to voice their concerns. On occasions, patients were willing to pursue their own agenda when their concern was initially overlooked. Conclusion: This study provides empirical evidence on communication patterns in physiotherapy practice. A more collaborative style of communication with a shared conversational agenda provided patients with the conversational space to describe their concerns more fully.
Entities:
Keywords:
Patients’ concerns; communication; low back pain; patient-centred care; physiotherapy
Authors: Helen Slater; Joanne E Jordan; Peter B O'Sullivan; Robert Schütze; Roger Goucke; Jason Chua; Allyson Browne; Ben Horgan; Simone De Morgan; Andrew M Briggs Journal: Pain Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Roberto Costa Krug; J P Caneiro; Daniel Cury Ribeiro; Ben Darlow; Marcelo Faria Silva; Jefferson Fagundes Loss Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Anne Thackeray; Jackie Waring; Thomas J Hoogeboom; Maria W G Nijhuis-van Der Sanden; Rachel Hess; Julie M Fritz; Molly B Conroy; Maria E Fernandez Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-07-11