Literature DB >> 31391953

Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and inter-action energy and DFT studies of 3-{(2Z)-2-[(2,4-di-chloro-phen-yl)methyl-idene]-3-oxo-3,4-di-hydro-2H-1,4-benzo-thia-zin-4-yl}propane-nitrile.

Nada Kheira Sebbar1,2, Brahim Hni2, Tuncer Hökelek3, Abdelhakim Jaouhar1, Mohamed Labd Taha1, Joel T Mague4, El Mokhtar Essassi2.   

Abstract

The title compound, C18H12Cl2N2OS, consists of a di-hydro-benzo-thia-zine unit linked by a -CH group to a 2,4-di-chloro-phenyl substituent, and to a propane-nitrile unit is folded along the S⋯N axis and adopts a flattened-boat conformation. The propane-nitrile moiety is nearly perpendicular to the mean plane of the di-hydro-benzo-thia-zine unit. In the crystal, C-HBnz⋯NPrpnit and C-HPrpnit⋯OThz (Bnz = benzene, Prpnit = propane-nitrile and Thz = thia-zine) hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into inversion dimers, enclosing R 2 2(16) and R 2 2(12) ring motifs, which are linked into stepped ribbons extending along [110]. The ribbons are linked in pairs by complementary C=O⋯Cl inter-actions. π-π contacts between the benzene and phenyl rings, [centroid-centroid distance = 3.974 (1) Å] may further stabilize the structure. The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H⋯H (23.4%), H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H (19.5%), H⋯C/C⋯H (13.5%), H⋯N/N⋯H (13.3%), CC (10.4%) and H⋯O/O⋯H (5.1%) inter-actions. Hydrogen bonding and van der Waals inter-actions are the dominant inter-actions in the crystal packing. Computational chemistry calculations indicate that the two independent C-HBnz⋯NPrpnit and C-HPrpnit⋯OThz hydrogen bonds in the crystal impart about the same energy (ca 43 kJ mol-1). Density functional theory (DFT) optimized structures at the B3LYP/6-311 G(d,p) level are compared with the experimentally determined mol-ecular structure in the solid state. The HOMO-LUMO behaviour was elucidated to determine the energy gap.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DFT; Hirshfeld surface; crystal structure; di­hydro­benzo­thia­zine; hydrogen bond; nitrile; oxygen⋯halogen inter­action

Year:  2019        PMID: 31391953      PMCID: PMC6658978          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019005966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

1,4-Benzo­thia­zine derivatives constitute an important class of heterocyclic systems. These mol­ecules exhibit a wide range of biological applications indicating that the 1,4-benzo­thia­zine moiety is a potentially useful template in medicinal chemistry research and has therapeutic applications as anti-inflammatory (Trapani et al., 1985 ▸; Gowda et al., 2011 ▸), anti­pyretic (Warren & Knaus, 1987 ▸), anti-microbial (Armenise et al., 2012 ▸; Rathore & Kumar, 2006 ▸; Sabatini et al., 2008 ▸), anti-viral (Malagu et al., 1998 ▸), anti-cancer (Gupta et al., 1985 ▸; Gupta & Gupta, 1991 ▸) and anti-oxidant (Zia-ur-Rehman et al., 2009 ▸) agents. 1,4-Benzo­thia­zine derivatives have also been reported as precursors for the syntheses of new compounds (Sebbar et al., 2015a ▸; Vidal et al., 2006 ▸) possessing anti-diabetic (Tawada et al., 1990 ▸) and anti-corrosion activities (Ellouz et al., 2016a ▸,b ▸; Sebbar et al., 2016a ▸). They also possess biological properties (Hni et al., 2019a ▸; Saber et al., 2018 ▸; Ellouz et al., 2017a ▸,b ▸, 2018 ▸; Sebbar et al., 2017 ▸). As a continuation of our research work on the development of N-substituted 1,4-benzo­thia­zine derivatives and the evaluation of their potential pharmacological activities, we report herein the synthesis and the mol­ecular and crystal structures of the title compound along with the Hirshfeld surface analysis and the inter­molecular inter­action energies and the density functional theory (DFT) computational calculations carried out at the B3LYP/6–31 G(d,p) and B3LYP/6–311 G(d,p) levels, respectively.

Structural commentary

The title compound, (I), consists of a di­hydro­benzo­thia­zine unit linked by a –CH group to a 2,4-di­chloro­phenyl substituent and to a propane­nitrile moiety (Fig. 1 ▸). The di­hydro­benzo­thia­zine unit is folded along the S⋯N axis by 13.50 (9)°. The benzene ring, A (C1–C6), is oriented at a dihedral angle of 1.89 (6)° with respect to the phenyl ring, C (C10–C15). A puckering analysis of the heterocyclic ring B (S1/N1/C1/C6–C8) of the di­hydro­benzo­thia­zine unit gave the parameters Q T = 0.1983 (15) Å, q 2 = 0.1957 (17) Å, q 3 = 0.0323 (19) Å, φ = 354.6 (6)° and θ = 80.8 (5)°, indicating it adopts a flattened-boat conformation. The propane­nitrile moiety is essentially perpendicular to the di­hydro­benzo­thia­zine unit, as indicated by the C7—N1—C16—C17 torsion angle of 88.6 (2)°. In heterocyclic ring B, the C1—S1—C8 [103.69 (9)°], S1—C8—C7 [121.12 (14)°], C8—C7—N1 [120.59 (17)°], C7—N1—C6 [126.27 (16)°], C6—C1—S1 [123.84 (15)°] and N1—C6—C1 [121.46 (17)°] bond angles are enlarged when compared with the corresponding values in the closely related compounds, (2Z)-2-(4-chloro­benzyl­idene)-4-[2-(2-oxooxazoliden-3-yl) eth­yl]-3,4-di­hydro-2H-1,4-benzo­thia­zin-3-one, (II), (Ellouz et al., 2017a ▸) and (2Z)-2-[(4-fluoro­benzyl­idene]-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)-3,4 -di­hydro-2H-1,4-benzo­thia­zin-3-one, (III), (Hni et al., 2019a ▸), and are nearly the same as the corresponding values in (2Z)-4-[2-(2-oxo-1,3-oxazolidin-3-yl)eth­yl]-2(phenyl­methyl­idene)-3,4-di­hydro-2H-1,4-benzo­thia­zin-3-one, (IV), (Sebbar et al., 2016b ▸) and (2Z)-2-[(2,4-di­chloro­phen­yl)methyl­idene]-4-[2-(2-oxo-1,3-oxazolidin-3-yl)eth­yl]3,4-di­hydro-2H-1,4-benzo­thia­zin-3-one, (V), (Hni et al., 2019b ▸), where the heterocyclic portions of the di­hydro­benzo­thia­zine units are planar in (IV) and non-planar in (II), (III) and (V).
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, inversion dimers are formed by C—HBnz⋯NPrpnit (Bnz = benzene and Prpnit = propane­nitrile) hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 2 ▸), enclosing (16) ring motifs, and these units are linked into stepped ribbons extending along [110] by inversion-related CHPrpnit⋯OThz (Thz = thia­zine) hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 2 ▸), enclosing (12) ring motifs. The ribbons are arranged in pairs with inversion-related Cl2⋯O1 contacts of 3.027 (2) Å and C15=O1⋯Cl2 angles of 170.41 (7)° (Fig. 3 ▸). The contact is noticeably less than the sum of the van der Waals radii (3.27 Å), and the contact and angle compare well with corresponding parameters found in the structure of 2,5-di­chloro-1,4-benzo­quinone and attributed to attractive O⋯Cl inter­actions (Lommerse et al., 1996) ▸. The π–π contacts between the benzene (C1–C6, centroid Cg1) and 2,4-dichlorophenyl rings (C10–C15, centroid Cg3) [Cg1⋯Cg3(x − 1, y − 1, z) = 3.974 (1) Å] may further stabilize the structure.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C5—H5⋯N2viii 0.952.433.282 (3)149
C17—H17A⋯O1vii 0.992.453.337 (3)149

Symmetry codes: (vii) ; (viii) .

Figure 2

A partial packing diagram viewed along the c-axis direction with the C—H⋯O and C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds shown, respectively, as black and blue dashed lines.

Figure 3

A partial packing diagram viewed along the a-axis direction with hydrogen bonds depicted as in Fig. 2 ▸, and C=O⋯Cl inter­actions as green dashed lines.

Hirshfeld surface analysis

In order to visualize the inter­molecular inter­actions in the crystal of the title compound, a Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis (Hirshfeld, 1977 ▸; Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ▸) was carried out by using CrystalExplorer17.5 (Turner et al., 2017 ▸. In the HS plotted over d norm (Fig. 4 ▸), the white surface indicates contacts with distances equal to the sum of van der Waals radii, and the red and blue colours indicate distances shorter (in close contact) or longer (distinct contact) than the van der Waals radii, respectively (Venkatesan et al., 2016 ▸). The bright-red spots indicate their roles as the respective donors and/or acceptors; they also appear as blue and red regions corresponding to positive and negative potentials on the HS mapped over electrostatic potential (Spackman et al., 2008 ▸; Jayatilaka et al., 2005 ▸) shown in Fig. 5 ▸. The blue regions indicate positive electrostatic potential (hydrogen-bond donors), while the red regions indicate negative electrostatic potential (hydrogen-bond acceptors). The shape-index of the HS is a tool to visualize the π–π stacking by the presence of adjacent red and blue triangles; if there are no adjacent red and/or blue triangles, then there are no π–π inter­actions. Fig. 6 ▸ clearly suggest that there are π–π inter­actions in (I).
Figure 4

View of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of the title compound plotted over d norm in the range −0.2386 to 1.2893 a.u.

Figure 5

View of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of the title compound plotted over electrostatic potential energy in the range −0.0500 to 0.0500 a.u. using the STO-3 G basis set at the Hartree–Fock level of theory. Hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors are shown as blue and red regions around the atoms corresponding to positive and negative potentials, respectively.

Figure 6

Hirshfeld surface of the title compound plotted over shape-index.

The overall two-dimensional fingerprint plot, Fig. 7 ▸ a, and those delineated into H⋯H, H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H, H⋯C/C⋯H, H⋯N/N⋯H, CC, H⋯O/O⋯H, C⋯Cl/Cl⋯C, H⋯S/S⋯H, C⋯S/S⋯C, O⋯Cl/Cl⋯O and C⋯N/N⋯C contacts (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸) are illustrated in Fig. 7 ▸ b–l, respectively, together with their relative contributions to the Hirshfeld surface. The most important inter­action is H⋯H (Table 2 ▸), contributing 23.4% to the overall crystal packing, which is reflected in Fig. 7 ▸ b as widely scattered points of high density due to the large hydrogen content of the mol­ecule with the small split tips at d e + d i = 2.32 Å. The pair of wings in the fingerprint plot delineated into H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H contacts (19.5% contribution) have a nearly symmetrical distribution of points, Fig. 7 ▸ c, with the thin edges at d e + d i = 2.82 Å. In the absence of C—H⋯π inter­actions, the wings in the fingerprint plot delineated into H⋯C/C⋯H contacts (13.5%) also have a nearly symmetrical distribution of points, Fig. 7 ▸ d, with the thick edges at d e + d i ∼2.90 Å. The wings in the fingerprint plot delineated into H⋯N/N⋯H contacts (13.3%, Fig. 7 ▸ e) have as pair of spikes with the tips at d e + d i = 2.30 Å. The CC contacts (10.4%, Fig. 7 ▸ f) have an arrow-shaped distribution of points with the tip at d e = d i ∼1.78 Å. The H⋯O/O⋯H (5.1%, Fig. 7 ▸ g) and C⋯Cl/Cl⋯C (4.6%, Fig. 7 ▸ h) contacts (Table 2 ▸) are viewed as pairs of thin spikes with the tips at d e + d i = 2.34 and 3.50 Å, respectively. Finally, the H⋯S/S ⋯ H (2.6%, Fig. 7 ▸ i) and C⋯S/S⋯C (2.3%, Fig. 7 ▸ j) contacts are seen as pairs of wide spikes with the tips at d e + d i ∼3.30 and 3.48 Å, respectively.
Figure 7

The full two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the title compound, showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H, (d) H⋯C/C⋯H, (e) H⋯N/N⋯H, (f) C⋯C, (g) H⋯O/O⋯H, (h) C⋯Cl/Cl⋯C, (i) H⋯S/S⋯H, (j) C⋯S/S⋯C, (k) O⋯Cl/Cl⋯O and (l) C⋯N/N⋯C inter­actions. The d i and d e values are the closest inter­nal and external distances (in Å) from given points on the Hirshfeld surface contacts.

Table 2

Selected interatomic distances (Å)

Cl2⋯C18i 3.649 (2)N2⋯H16A ix 2.81
Cl2⋯C7ii 3.520 (2)C2⋯C11vi 3.569 (3)
Cl2⋯O1i 3.0269 (15)C4⋯C12x 3.577 (3)
Cl1⋯H2iii 3.00C4⋯C8vi 3.490 (3)
Cl1⋯H4iv 2.94C5⋯C14x 3.557 (3)
Cl2⋯H17A ii 3.06C5⋯C173.352 (3)
Cl2⋯H92.51C8⋯C4ii 3.490 (3)
Cl2⋯H16B v 2.96C9⋯C18vii 3.497 (3)
S1⋯N13.1168 (17)C11⋯C2ii 3.569 (3)
S1⋯C3ii 3.598 (2)C12⋯C4v 3.577 (3)
S1⋯C4ii 3.510 (2)C14⋯C5v 3.557 (3)
S1⋯C113.162 (2)C17⋯C53.352 (3)
S1⋯C14vi 3.578 (2)C18⋯C9vii 3.497 (3)
S1⋯H112.47C5⋯H16B 2.53
O1⋯C173.210 (2)C5⋯H17B 2.86
O1⋯Cl2i 3.0269 (15)C8⋯H112.94
O1⋯C17vii 3.336 (3)C16⋯H52.48
O1⋯H17A 2.79C17⋯H52.79
O1⋯H92.24C18⋯H9vii 2.98
O1⋯H16A 2.29H2⋯H12xi 2.49
O1⋯H17A vii 2.45H5⋯H16B 2.03
N2⋯C5viii 3.282 (3)H5⋯H17B 2.26
N2⋯H5viii 2.43  

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) ; (vi) ; (vii) ; (viii) ; (ix) ; (x) ; (xi) .

The Hirshfeld surface representations with the function d norm plotted onto the surface are shown for the H⋯H, H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H, H⋯C/C⋯H, H ⋯ N/N⋯H, CC and H⋯O/O⋯H inter­actions in Fig. 8 ▸ a–f, respectively.
Figure 8

The Hirshfeld surface representations with the function d norm plotted onto the surface for (a) H⋯H, (b) H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H, (c) H⋯C/C⋯H, (d) H⋯N/N⋯H, (e) C⋯C and (f) H⋯O/O⋯H inter­actions.

The Hirshfeld surface analysis confirms the importance of H-atom contacts in establishing the packing. The large number of H⋯H, H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H, H ⋯ C/C⋯H and H⋯N/N⋯H inter­actions suggest that van der Waals inter­actions and hydrogen bonding play the major roles in the crystal packing (Hathwar et al., 2015 ▸).

Inter­action energy calculations

The inter­molecular inter­action energies were calculated using the CE–B3LYP/6–31G(d,p) energy model available in CrystalExplorer17.5 (Turner et al., 2017 ▸), where a cluster of mol­ecules is generated by applying crystallographic symmetry operations with respect to a selected central mol­ecule within a default radius of 3.8 Å (Turner et al., 2014 ▸). The total inter­molecular energy (E tot) is the sum of electrostatic (E ele), polarization (E pol), dispersion (E dis) and exchange-repulsion (E rep) energies (Turner et al., 2015 ▸) with scale factors of 1.057, 0.740, 0.871 and 0.618, respectively (Mackenzie et al., 2017 ▸). Hydrogen-bonding inter­action energies (in kJ mol−1) were calculated to be −13.0 (E ele), −1.8 (E pol), −68.0 (E dis), 48.3 (E rep) and −44.4 (E tot) for the C—HBnz⋯NPrpnit hydrogen-bonding inter­action and −37.3 (E ele), −9.3 (E pol), −19.0 (E dis), 33.7 (E rep) and −42.0 (E tot) for CHPrpnit⋯OThz.

DFT calculations

The optimized structure of the title compound in the gas phase was generated theoretically via density functional theory (DFT) using standard B3LYP functional and 6–311 G(d,p) basis-set calculations (Becke, 1993 ▸) as implemented in GAUSSIAN 09 (Frisch et al., 2009 ▸). The theoretical and experimental results were in good agreement. The highest-occupied mol­ecular orbital (HOMO), acting as an electron donor, and the lowest-unoccupied mol­ecular orbital (LUMO), acting as an electron acceptor, are very important parameters for quantum chemistry. When the energy gap is small, the mol­ecule is highly polarizable and has high chemical reactivity. The electron transition from the HOMO to the LUMO energy level is shown in Fig. 9 ▸. The HOMO and LUMO are localized in the plane extending from the whole 3-[(2Z)-2-[(2,4-di­chloro­phen­yl)methyl­idene]-3-oxo-3,4-di­hydro-2H-1,4-benzo­thia­zin-4-yl]propane­nitrile ring. The energy band gap [ΔE = E LUMO − E HOMO] of the mol­ecule is about 6.1979 eV, and the frontier mol­ecular orbital energies, E HOMO and E LUMO are −7.1543 and −0.9564 eV, respectively.
Figure 9

The energy band gap of the title compound.

Database survey

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom et al., 2016 ▸; updated to March 2019), for compounds containing the fragment II (R 1 = Ph, R 2 = C), gave 14 hits. With R 1 = Ph and R 2 = CH2C≡CH IIa (Sebbar et al., 2014a ▸), CH2COOH IIb (Sebbar et al., 2016c ▸), IIc (Sebbar et al., 2016b ▸) and IIf (Sebbar et al., 2015b ▸), there are other examples with R 1 = 4-FC6H4 and R 2 = CH2C≡CH IIa (Hni et al., 2019a ▸), R 1 = 4-ClC6H4 and R 2 = CH2Ph2 IId (Ellouz et al., 2016c ▸) and R 1 = 2-ClC6H4, R 2 = CH2C≡CH IIa (Sebbar et al., 2017 ▸). In all these compounds, the configuration about the benzyl­idene C=CHC6H5 bond is Z, and in the majority of these, the heterocyclic ring is quite non-planar with the dihedral angle between the plane defined by the benzene ring plus the nitro­gen and sulfur atoms and that defined by nitro­gen and sulfur and the other two carbon atoms separating them ranging from ca 29° (IIa) to 36° (IIf). The other three (IIa, IIc) have the benzo­thia­zine unit nearly planar with a corresponding dihedral angle of ca 3–4°.

Synthesis and crystallization

3-Bromo­propane­nitrile (2.0 mmol) was added to a mixture of (Z)-2-(2,4-di­chloro­benzyl­idene)-2H-1,4-benzo­thia­zin-3(4H)-one (1.8 mmol), potassium carbonate (2.0 mmol) and tetra n-butyl ammonium bromide (0.15 mmol) in DMF (20 ml). Stirring was continued at room temperature for 12 h. The salts were removed by filtration and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was separated by chromatography on a column of silica gel with ethyl acetate–hexane (1/9) as eluent. The solid product obtained was recrystallized from ethanol to afford colourless crystals (yield: 82%).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.95 Å for aromatic and methine H atoms and 0.99 Å for methyl­ene H atoms) and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC18H12Cl2N2OS
M r 375.26
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)6.5687 (6), 7.9971 (7), 15.4939 (13)
α, β, γ (°)98.105 (4), 94.316 (4), 95.002 (4)
V3)799.54 (12)
Z 2
Radiation typeCu Kα
μ (mm−1)4.93
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.14 × 0.10
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker D8 VENTURE PHOTON 100 CMOS
Absorption correctionNumerical (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
T min, T max 0.47, 0.65
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections6131, 2978, 2744
R int 0.030
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.618
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.035, 0.095, 1.06
No. of reflections2978
No. of parameters217
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.25, −0.35

Computer programs: SAINT (Bruker, 2016 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2012 ▸) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019005966/lh5901sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019005966/lh5901Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989019005966/lh5901Isup3.cdx CCDC reference: 1913051 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C18H12Cl2N2OSZ = 2
Mr = 375.26F(000) = 384
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.559 Mg m3
a = 6.5687 (6) ÅCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
b = 7.9971 (7) ÅCell parameters from 5359 reflections
c = 15.4939 (13) Åθ = 5.6–72.4°
α = 98.105 (4)°µ = 4.93 mm1
β = 94.316 (4)°T = 150 K
γ = 95.002 (4)°Block, light yellow
V = 799.54 (12) Å30.20 × 0.14 × 0.10 mm
Bruker D8 VENTURE PHOTON 100 CMOS diffractometer2978 independent reflections
Radiation source: INCOATEC IµS micro-focus source2744 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromatorRint = 0.030
Detector resolution: 10.4167 pixels mm-1θmax = 72.4°, θmin = 5.6°
ω scansh = −8→8
Absorption correction: numerical (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.47, Tmax = 0.65l = −18→19
6131 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.095H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0424P)2 + 0.4609P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2978 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
217 parametersΔρmax = 0.25 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.35 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. H-atoms attached to carbon were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95 - 0.99 Å) and included as riding contributions with isotropic displacement parameters 1.2 - 1.5 times those of the attached atoms.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl11.46628 (8)0.81960 (7)0.07781 (3)0.04020 (16)
Cl21.26553 (7)0.65190 (6)0.38541 (3)0.03278 (15)
S10.56343 (7)0.34226 (7)0.16525 (3)0.03124 (15)
O10.6855 (2)0.3626 (2)0.42004 (9)0.0366 (4)
N10.4171 (2)0.2189 (2)0.33447 (10)0.0271 (3)
N20.1980 (3)0.0890 (3)0.60834 (14)0.0469 (5)
C10.3267 (3)0.2389 (2)0.17968 (13)0.0267 (4)
C20.1860 (3)0.2031 (3)0.10570 (14)0.0329 (4)
H20.2212850.2389650.0523830.039*
C3−0.0034 (3)0.1162 (3)0.10908 (14)0.0354 (5)
H3−0.0976260.0905180.0583250.042*
C4−0.0542 (3)0.0669 (3)0.18748 (15)0.0346 (5)
H4−0.1847230.0077780.1905260.042*
C50.0823 (3)0.1028 (3)0.26120 (14)0.0321 (4)
H50.0439340.0690930.3145870.039*
C60.2759 (3)0.1878 (2)0.25857 (13)0.0267 (4)
C70.5932 (3)0.3289 (3)0.34700 (13)0.0279 (4)
C80.6774 (3)0.4023 (2)0.27150 (13)0.0263 (4)
C90.8579 (3)0.5003 (2)0.29147 (13)0.0281 (4)
H90.9017790.5205630.3521930.034*
C100.9972 (3)0.5804 (2)0.23760 (13)0.0269 (4)
C110.9552 (3)0.5907 (3)0.14823 (14)0.0331 (4)
H110.8241040.5460390.1203520.040*
C121.0964 (3)0.6631 (3)0.09939 (13)0.0328 (4)
H121.0634050.6664620.0389480.039*
C131.2868 (3)0.7305 (3)0.13960 (13)0.0296 (4)
C141.3374 (3)0.7275 (2)0.22748 (13)0.0294 (4)
H141.4680430.7751940.2546820.035*
C151.1936 (3)0.6535 (2)0.27505 (13)0.0267 (4)
C160.3685 (3)0.1376 (3)0.41071 (13)0.0297 (4)
H16A0.4979660.1207000.4438930.036*
H16B0.2935160.0244510.3901730.036*
C170.2378 (3)0.2424 (3)0.47210 (13)0.0324 (4)
H17A0.3071850.3583660.4902950.039*
H17B0.1026090.2515410.4412510.039*
C180.2103 (3)0.1586 (3)0.54900 (14)0.0337 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0318 (3)0.0578 (3)0.0310 (3)−0.0053 (2)0.0060 (2)0.0108 (2)
Cl20.0310 (3)0.0415 (3)0.0244 (3)−0.00393 (19)−0.00445 (18)0.0084 (2)
S10.0251 (3)0.0468 (3)0.0203 (2)−0.0039 (2)0.00083 (17)0.0050 (2)
O10.0377 (8)0.0475 (9)0.0219 (7)−0.0087 (7)−0.0026 (6)0.0067 (6)
N10.0274 (8)0.0318 (8)0.0216 (8)−0.0019 (6)0.0014 (6)0.0051 (6)
N20.0523 (13)0.0529 (12)0.0393 (12)0.0016 (10)0.0169 (9)0.0153 (10)
C10.0224 (9)0.0321 (10)0.0250 (10)0.0021 (7)0.0026 (7)0.0029 (8)
C20.0276 (10)0.0446 (12)0.0259 (10)0.0036 (8)0.0010 (8)0.0035 (9)
C30.0271 (10)0.0460 (12)0.0299 (11)−0.0001 (9)−0.0024 (8)−0.0003 (9)
C40.0260 (10)0.0379 (11)0.0371 (12)−0.0031 (8)0.0017 (8)0.0006 (9)
C50.0308 (10)0.0342 (10)0.0307 (11)−0.0018 (8)0.0056 (8)0.0041 (8)
C60.0255 (9)0.0279 (9)0.0256 (10)0.0014 (7)0.0010 (7)0.0016 (8)
C70.0279 (10)0.0325 (10)0.0228 (10)0.0007 (8)0.0013 (7)0.0037 (8)
C80.0256 (9)0.0308 (9)0.0220 (9)0.0009 (7)0.0015 (7)0.0037 (7)
C90.0286 (10)0.0327 (10)0.0220 (9)0.0005 (8)0.0003 (7)0.0037 (8)
C100.0260 (10)0.0292 (9)0.0253 (10)0.0010 (7)0.0016 (7)0.0047 (8)
C110.0297 (10)0.0418 (11)0.0261 (10)−0.0044 (8)−0.0028 (8)0.0071 (9)
C120.0326 (11)0.0418 (11)0.0235 (10)−0.0020 (9)−0.0010 (8)0.0091 (8)
C130.0261 (10)0.0349 (10)0.0284 (10)0.0005 (8)0.0056 (8)0.0067 (8)
C140.0241 (9)0.0344 (10)0.0290 (11)0.0010 (8)0.0006 (8)0.0045 (8)
C150.0272 (10)0.0291 (9)0.0232 (9)0.0019 (7)−0.0012 (7)0.0041 (7)
C160.0317 (10)0.0331 (10)0.0254 (10)0.0003 (8)0.0036 (8)0.0095 (8)
C170.0358 (11)0.0342 (10)0.0273 (11)−0.0006 (8)0.0052 (8)0.0063 (8)
C180.0335 (11)0.0378 (11)0.0296 (11)−0.0002 (8)0.0083 (8)0.0033 (9)
Cl1—C131.741 (2)C7—C81.501 (3)
Cl2—C151.742 (2)C8—C91.353 (3)
S1—C81.7407 (19)C9—C101.452 (3)
S1—C11.7411 (19)C9—H90.9500
O1—C71.226 (2)C10—C111.407 (3)
N1—C71.375 (3)C10—C151.415 (3)
N1—C61.421 (2)C11—C121.380 (3)
N1—C161.469 (2)C11—H110.9500
N2—C181.144 (3)C12—C131.383 (3)
C1—C61.397 (3)C12—H120.9500
C1—C21.397 (3)C13—C141.381 (3)
C2—C31.380 (3)C14—C151.384 (3)
C2—H20.9500C14—H140.9500
C3—C41.384 (3)C16—C171.538 (3)
C3—H30.9500C16—H16A0.9900
C4—C51.378 (3)C16—H16B0.9900
C4—H40.9500C17—C181.462 (3)
C5—C61.395 (3)C17—H17A0.9900
C5—H50.9500C17—H17B0.9900
Cl2···C18i3.649 (2)N2···H16Aix2.81
Cl2···C7ii3.520 (2)C2···C11vi3.569 (3)
Cl2···O1i3.0269 (15)C4···C12x3.577 (3)
Cl1···H2iii3.00C4···C8vi3.490 (3)
Cl1···H4iv2.94C5···C14x3.557 (3)
Cl2···H17Aii3.06C5···C173.352 (3)
Cl2···H92.51C8···C4ii3.490 (3)
Cl2···H16Bv2.96C9···C18vii3.497 (3)
S1···N13.1168 (17)C11···C2ii3.569 (3)
S1···C3ii3.598 (2)C12···C4v3.577 (3)
S1···C4ii3.510 (2)C14···C5v3.557 (3)
S1···C113.162 (2)C17···C53.352 (3)
S1···C14vi3.578 (2)C18···C9vii3.497 (3)
S1···H112.47C5···H16B2.53
O1···C173.210 (2)C5···H17B2.86
O1···Cl2i3.0269 (15)C8···H112.94
O1···C17vii3.336 (3)C16···H52.48
O1···H17A2.79C17···H52.79
O1···H92.24C18···H9vii2.98
O1···H16A2.29H2···H12xi2.49
O1···H17Avii2.45H5···H16B2.03
N2···C5viii3.282 (3)H5···H17B2.26
N2···H5viii2.43
C8—S1—C1103.69 (9)C11—C10—C15115.36 (18)
C7—N1—C6126.27 (16)C11—C10—C9125.21 (18)
C7—N1—C16114.86 (16)C15—C10—C9119.43 (18)
C6—N1—C16118.72 (16)C12—C11—C10122.73 (19)
C6—C1—C2120.06 (18)C12—C11—H11118.6
C6—C1—S1123.84 (15)C10—C11—H11118.6
C2—C1—S1116.06 (15)C11—C12—C13119.12 (19)
C3—C2—C1120.8 (2)C11—C12—H12120.4
C3—C2—H2119.6C13—C12—H12120.4
C1—C2—H2119.6C14—C13—C12121.32 (18)
C2—C3—C4119.0 (2)C14—C13—Cl1119.49 (15)
C2—C3—H3120.5C12—C13—Cl1119.19 (16)
C4—C3—H3120.5C13—C14—C15118.53 (18)
C5—C4—C3120.8 (2)C13—C14—H14120.7
C5—C4—H4119.6C15—C14—H14120.7
C3—C4—H4119.6C14—C15—C10122.93 (18)
C4—C5—C6121.0 (2)C14—C15—Cl2116.72 (15)
C4—C5—H5119.5C10—C15—Cl2120.34 (15)
C6—C5—H5119.5N1—C16—C17112.76 (16)
C5—C6—C1118.32 (18)N1—C16—H16A109.0
C5—C6—N1120.22 (18)C17—C16—H16A109.0
C1—C6—N1121.46 (17)N1—C16—H16B109.0
O1—C7—N1119.47 (18)C17—C16—H16B109.0
O1—C7—C8119.89 (18)H16A—C16—H16B107.8
N1—C7—C8120.59 (17)C18—C17—C16108.89 (17)
C9—C8—C7114.77 (17)C18—C17—H17A109.9
C9—C8—S1123.67 (15)C16—C17—H17A109.9
C7—C8—S1121.12 (14)C18—C17—H17B109.9
C8—C9—C10132.12 (19)C16—C17—H17B109.9
C8—C9—H9113.9H17A—C17—H17B108.3
C10—C9—H9113.9N2—C18—C17176.4 (2)
C8—S1—C1—C6−13.00 (19)N1—C7—C8—S1−3.4 (3)
C8—S1—C1—C2168.95 (15)C1—S1—C8—C9−173.92 (17)
C6—C1—C2—C3−0.4 (3)C1—S1—C8—C714.09 (18)
S1—C1—C2—C3177.68 (17)C7—C8—C9—C10173.6 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C41.0 (3)S1—C8—C9—C101.1 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.4 (3)C8—C9—C10—C119.6 (4)
C3—C4—C5—C6−0.7 (3)C8—C9—C10—C15−169.6 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C11.3 (3)C15—C10—C11—C121.6 (3)
C4—C5—C6—N1−178.01 (19)C9—C10—C11—C12−177.6 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C5−0.7 (3)C10—C11—C12—C13−0.9 (3)
S1—C1—C6—C5−178.69 (15)C11—C12—C13—C14−0.3 (3)
C2—C1—C6—N1178.59 (18)C11—C12—C13—Cl1179.24 (17)
S1—C1—C6—N10.6 (3)C12—C13—C14—C150.6 (3)
C7—N1—C6—C5−165.80 (19)Cl1—C13—C14—C15−178.93 (15)
C16—N1—C6—C59.4 (3)C13—C14—C15—C100.2 (3)
C7—N1—C6—C114.9 (3)C13—C14—C15—Cl2179.63 (15)
C16—N1—C6—C1−169.86 (18)C11—C10—C15—C14−1.3 (3)
C6—N1—C7—O1169.33 (18)C9—C10—C15—C14177.97 (18)
C16—N1—C7—O1−6.1 (3)C11—C10—C15—Cl2179.34 (15)
C6—N1—C7—C8−13.1 (3)C9—C10—C15—Cl2−1.4 (3)
C16—N1—C7—C8171.47 (17)C7—N1—C16—C1788.6 (2)
O1—C7—C8—C91.4 (3)C6—N1—C16—C17−87.2 (2)
N1—C7—C8—C9−176.09 (18)N1—C16—C17—C18−175.75 (17)
O1—C7—C8—S1174.09 (16)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C5—H5···N2viii0.952.433.282 (3)149
C17—H17A···O1vii0.992.453.337 (3)149
  20 in total

1.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  A facile synthesis of novel biologically active 4-hydroxy-N'-(benzylidene)-2H-benzo[e][1,2]thiazine-3-carbohydrazide 1,1-dioxides.

Authors:  Muhammad Zia-ur-Rehman; Jamil Anwar Choudary; Mark Robert James Elsegood; Hamid Latif Siddiqui; Khalid Mohammad Khan
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Energy frameworks: insights into interaction anisotropy and the mechanical properties of molecular crystals.

Authors:  Michael J Turner; Sajesh P Thomas; Ming W Shi; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological activity of 4-{[1-substituted aminomethyl-4-arylideneamino-5-sulfanyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl]methyl}-2H-1,4-benzothiazin-3(4H)-ones.

Authors:  J Gowda; A M A Khader; B Kalluraya; Padma Shree; A R Shabaraya
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Studies on antidiabetic agents. IX. A new aldose reductase inhibitor, AD-5467, and related 1,4-benzoxazine and 1,4-benzothiazine derivatives: synthesis and biological activity.

Authors:  H Tawada; Y Sugiyama; H Ikeda; Y Yamamoto; K Meguro
Journal:  Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.645

7.  Synthesis of 7-chloro-5-trifluoromethyl/7-fluoro/7-trifluoromethyl-4H-1,4-benzothiazines as antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  Bhawani Singh Rathore; M Kumar
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  From phenothiazine to 3-phenyl-1,4-benzothiazine derivatives as inhibitors of the Staphylococcus aureus NorA multidrug efflux pump.

Authors:  Stefano Sabatini; Glenn W Kaatz; Gian Maria Rossolini; David Brandini; Arnaldo Fravolini
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  (2Z)-2-Benzyl-idene-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yl)-2H-1,4-benzo-thia-zin-3(4H)-one.

Authors:  Nada Kheira Sebbar; Abdelfettah Zerzouf; El Mokhtar Essassi; Mohamed Saadi; Lahcen El Ammari
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2014-04-26

10.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

View more
  2 in total

1.  Exploration of CH⋯F & CF⋯H mediated supramolecular arrangements into fluorinated terphenyls and theoretical prediction of their third-order nonlinear optical response.

Authors:  Muhammad Adeel; Muhammad Khalid; Malik Aman Ullah; Shabbir Muhammad; Muhammad Usman Khan; Muhammad Nawaz Tahir; Ilham Khan; Muhammad Asghar; Khawar Shahzad Mughal
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.361

2.  Exploration of Noncovalent Interactions, Chemical Reactivity, and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Piperidone Derivatives: A Concise Theoretical Approach.

Authors:  Muhammad Khalid; Akbar Ali; Muhammad Fayyaz Ur Rehman; Muhammad Mustaqeem; Shehbaz Ali; Muhammad Usman Khan; Sumreen Asim; Naseeb Ahmad; Muhammad Saleem
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-05-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.