Literature DB >> 31391950

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of dibutyl 5,5'-(pentane-3,3-diyl)bis(1H-pyrrole-5-carboxylate).

Haijing Wang1,2, Zhenming Yin1,2.   

Abstract

The mol-ecular structure of the title compound, C23H34N2O4, has C2 symmetry. In the crystal, inter-locked dimers are formed through quadruple N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds between pyrrole N-H groups and carbonyl O atoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure; dipyrro­methane-di­carboxyl­ate; hydrogen bonding

Year:  2019        PMID: 31391950      PMCID: PMC6658981          DOI: 10.1107/S205698901900567X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Hydrogen-bonding inter­actions play an important role in the design of functional assemblies that exhibit a variety of properties and functions (Prins et al., 2001 ▸; Steiner, 2002 ▸). Pyrrole-2-carboxyl­ate possesses one hydrogen-bond donor (N—Hpyrrole) and one acceptor (C=O), which favour the formation of centrosymmetric dimers with pairs of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Figueira et al., 2015 ▸). The dimer motif is structurally similar to classic Watson–Crick nucleotide base-pairs. Calculations have revealed the dimer motif to be a robust supra­molecular synthon in crystal engineering (Dubis et al., 2002 ▸). In previous work, we have shown a way to use the 2-carbonyl pyrrole dimer as a supra­molecular connector to construct hexa­gonal and grid architectures (Yin et al., 2006 ▸). Here, we report the self-assembly of the title compound, via quadruple N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds.

Structural commentary

The structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The asymmetric unit contains one half-mol­ecule as it possesses C2 symmetry. In the mol­ecule, the two pyrrole-2-carboxyl­ate groups are both in a syn conformation, with the carbonyl group arranged syn to its adjacent pyrrole NH group. The O1—C8—C7—N1 torsion angle is −8.2 (5)°. The dihedral angle between the pyrrole rings is 72.8 (2)°.
Figure 1

ORTEP diagram for the title compound, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 30% probability level. [Symmetry code: (A) x,  − y,  − z.]

Supra­molecular features

Pairs of mol­ecules of the title compound form inter­locked dimers through four N1—H1⋯O1 hydrogen bonds between the pyrrole carbonyl oxygen atoms and pyrrole NH protons (Table 1 ▸, Fig. 2 ▸). This type of dimer has also been observed in our previous work (Yin et al., 2007 ▸). The dimers are connected into a three-dimensional supra­molecular structure through C—H⋯π contacts (Table 1 ▸).
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 is the centroid of the N1/C4–C7 ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯O1i 0.862.122.962 (3)165
C12—H12CCg1ii 0.963.213.944 (3)135

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Figure 2

Part of the crystal packing showing mol­ecules linked by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (red dashed lines) and C—H⋯π contacts (green dashed lines). [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + , −y + , z; (ii) x + , y +  − z.]

Hirshfeld surface

A Hirshfeld surface analysis with CrystalExplorer (Turner et al., 2017 ▸) was performed to give insights into the important inter­molecular inter­actions. These are normalized by van der Waals radii through a red–white–blue color scheme, where the red spots denote close contacts of mol­ecules. The three-dimensional d norm surface of the title compound is shown in Fig. 3 ▸. The red points represent closer contacts and negative d norm values on the surface corresponding to the N—H⋯O and C—H⋯π inter­actions mentioned above. The two-dimensional fingerprint plots in Fig. 4 ▸ shown the inter­molecular contacts and their percentage distributions on the Hirshfeld surface. H⋯H inter­actions (74.8%) are present as a major contributor while H⋯O/O⋯H (14.5%), H⋯C/C⋯H (5.4%), C⋯C (2.7%) and H⋯N/N⋯H (0.9%) contacts also give significant contributions to the Hirshfeld surface.
Figure 3

The Hirshfeld surface of the title compound mapped over d norm in the range −0.486 to 1.895 a.u. The inter­molecular contacts can be seen in the red regions.

Figure 4

The two-dimensional fingerprint plots of title compound: (a) all contacts; (b) H⋯H, (c) H⋯O/O⋯H, (d) H⋯C/C⋯H, (e) H⋯N/N⋯H and (f) C⋯C.

Database survey

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom et al., 2016 ▸) returned over 60 entries for dipyrro­methane-1,9-dicarb­onyl derivatives, including seven entries whose supra­molecular structures feature inter­locked dimers (ILITAY, Love et al., 2003 ▸; ODUMOQ,Yin et al., 2007 ▸; PIRJAB, Xie et al., 1994 ▸; NIQBAR01, Mahanta et al., 2012 ▸; VACRID, Deliomeroglu et al., 2016 ▸; PUJMAJ, Kim, 2010 ▸ and SAVDUQ, Uppal et al., 2012 ▸). In the crystal of PUJMAJ (Kim, 2010 ▸), only one of the carbonyl groups is involved in hydrogen bonds with two pyrrole N—H groups.

Synthesis and crystallization

n-Butyl alcohol (370 mg, 5 mmol), 2,2′-ditrichlordi­pyrrole­methane (980 mg, 2 mmol) and tri­ethyl­amine (0.5 mL) were added to aceto­nitrile (20 mL), and then the mixture was refluxed for 2h. The solution was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:2), affording the title compound (white powder, 672 mg, 71%), m.p. = 388 K. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6); δ 0.64 (t, 6H, J = 7.2 Hz, –CH3), 0.90 (t, 6H, J = 7.2 Hz, –CH3), 1.31–1.41 (m, 4H, –CH2–), 1.58–1.65 (m, 4H, –CH2–), 2.15 (q, 4H, J = 7.2 Hz, Å –CH2–), 4.15 (q, 4H, J = 6.8 Hz, –CH2–), 5.97 (s, 2H, PyCH), 6.66 (s, 2H, PyCH), 11.22 (s, 2H, NH); HRMS (ESI) m/z calculated for C23H34N2O4, (M + H)+ 403.25186; found 403.25224. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by the slow evaporation of a CH3OH solution of the title compound.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. N—H hydrogen atoms were located from a difference-Fourier map and freely refined. Other H atoms were placed in difference calculated positions (C—H = 0.96 or 0.97 Å) and included in the final cycles of refinement using a riding model, with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC23H34N2O4
M r 402.52
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, F d d d
Temperature (K)296
a, b, c (Å)14.358 (6), 17.333 (7), 38.902 (19)
V3)9681 (7)
Z 16
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.08
Crystal size (mm)0.32 × 0.28 × 0.26
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)
T min, T max 0.822, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections11878, 2156, 1501
R int 0.031
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.595
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.081, 0.278, 1.05
No. of reflections2156
No. of parameters134
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.38, −0.34

Computer programs: SMART and SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▸), SHELXS (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901900567X/ff2158sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S205698901900567X/ff2158Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1912079 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C23H34N2O4Dx = 1.105 Mg m3
Mr = 402.52Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, FdddCell parameters from 3608 reflections
a = 14.358 (6) Åθ = 2.4–23.4°
b = 17.333 (7) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 38.902 (19) ÅT = 296 K
V = 9681 (7) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 160.32 × 0.28 × 0.26 mm
F(000) = 3488
Bruker SMART CCD area detector diffractometer1501 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.031
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 1.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −17→16
Tmin = 0.822, Tmax = 1.000k = −20→18
11878 measured reflectionsl = −46→44
2156 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.081H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.278w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1517P)2 + 16.1858P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
2156 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.38 e Å3
134 parametersΔρmin = −0.34 e Å3
2 restraints
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.68341 (16)0.20703 (14)0.05576 (7)0.0943 (8)
O20.65735 (17)0.33467 (14)0.05760 (8)0.1078 (10)
N10.51592 (15)0.18458 (13)0.09406 (6)0.0673 (7)
H10.53640.14120.08650.081*
C10.2522 (3)0.1657 (3)0.08110 (13)0.1320 (17)
H1A0.21310.18220.09970.198*
H1B0.21420.14590.06280.198*
H1C0.28800.20870.07290.198*
C20.3186 (2)0.1018 (2)0.09382 (9)0.0941 (11)
H2A0.35910.08690.07500.113*
H2B0.28190.05700.10010.113*
C30.3798 (3)0.12500.12500.0756 (11)
C40.44025 (19)0.19324 (17)0.11502 (7)0.0704 (8)
C50.4317 (2)0.27091 (19)0.12144 (10)0.0906 (10)
H50.38640.29370.13520.109*
C60.5026 (3)0.31011 (19)0.10378 (10)0.0919 (10)
H60.51260.36310.10360.110*
C70.5546 (2)0.25550 (17)0.08689 (8)0.0749 (8)
C80.6375 (2)0.26101 (19)0.06550 (9)0.0810 (9)
C90.7383 (3)0.3480 (3)0.03496 (16)0.141 (2)
H9A0.79530.33560.04710.169*
H9B0.73420.31490.01490.169*
C100.7401 (4)0.4274 (4)0.02437 (19)0.164 (2)
H10A0.79670.43590.01130.197*
H10B0.74400.45920.04480.197*
C110.6604 (5)0.4549 (4)0.0035 (2)0.193 (3)
H11A0.65510.4210−0.01620.232*
H11B0.60450.44780.01720.232*
C120.6597 (7)0.5314 (4)−0.0088 (2)0.211 (4)
H12A0.66110.56660.01020.316*
H12B0.60420.5399−0.02210.316*
H12C0.71330.5398−0.02310.316*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0756 (14)0.0847 (16)0.1227 (19)0.0097 (12)0.0142 (12)0.0162 (13)
O20.0842 (17)0.0826 (16)0.157 (2)0.0004 (12)0.0174 (15)0.0302 (14)
N10.0571 (13)0.0653 (13)0.0796 (15)0.0047 (10)−0.0016 (10)0.0003 (11)
C10.089 (3)0.169 (4)0.138 (4)−0.001 (3)−0.041 (3)0.027 (3)
C20.072 (2)0.116 (3)0.095 (2)−0.0173 (18)−0.0137 (16)0.0109 (19)
C30.053 (2)0.090 (3)0.083 (2)0.0000.0000.006 (2)
C40.0570 (15)0.0767 (18)0.0775 (17)0.0077 (13)−0.0020 (12)0.0027 (14)
C50.084 (2)0.083 (2)0.104 (2)0.0180 (17)0.0106 (18)−0.0065 (18)
C60.088 (2)0.0640 (18)0.124 (3)0.0049 (15)0.005 (2)0.0003 (18)
C70.0648 (17)0.0672 (17)0.093 (2)0.0018 (13)−0.0053 (15)0.0099 (14)
C80.0659 (18)0.0748 (19)0.102 (2)0.0011 (15)−0.0014 (16)0.0153 (16)
C90.075 (2)0.129 (3)0.219 (6)−0.003 (2)0.039 (3)0.043 (4)
C100.136 (4)0.149 (4)0.206 (6)−0.016 (4)0.033 (4)0.071 (4)
C110.156 (6)0.205 (6)0.219 (7)0.028 (5)0.033 (5)0.085 (6)
C120.276 (11)0.175 (5)0.182 (6)0.040 (7)0.051 (6)0.036 (5)
O1—C81.205 (4)C5—H50.9300
O2—C81.344 (4)C5—C61.404 (5)
O2—C91.477 (5)C6—H60.9300
N1—H10.8600C6—C71.372 (5)
N1—C41.367 (4)C7—C81.456 (5)
N1—C71.377 (4)C9—H9A0.9700
C1—H1A0.9600C9—H9B0.9700
C1—H1B0.9600C9—C101.436 (7)
C1—H1C0.9600C10—H10A0.9700
C1—C21.542 (6)C10—H10B0.9700
C2—H2A0.9700C10—C111.481 (9)
C2—H2B0.9700C11—H11A0.9700
C2—C31.551 (4)C11—H11B0.9700
C3—C2i1.551 (4)C11—C121.412 (8)
C3—C41.518 (4)C12—H12A0.9600
C3—C4i1.518 (4)C12—H12B0.9600
C4—C51.375 (4)C12—H12C0.9600
C8—O2—C9116.9 (3)N1—C7—C8120.3 (3)
C4—N1—H1125.0C6—C7—N1107.4 (3)
C4—N1—C7110.1 (2)C6—C7—C8132.3 (3)
C7—N1—H1125.0O1—C8—O2123.4 (3)
H1A—C1—H1B109.5O1—C8—C7125.1 (3)
H1A—C1—H1C109.5O2—C8—C7111.5 (3)
H1B—C1—H1C109.5O2—C9—H9A109.8
C2—C1—H1A109.5O2—C9—H9B109.8
C2—C1—H1B109.5H9A—C9—H9B108.2
C2—C1—H1C109.5C10—C9—O2109.6 (4)
C1—C2—H2A108.6C10—C9—H9A109.8
C1—C2—H2B108.6C10—C9—H9B109.8
C1—C2—C3114.5 (3)C9—C10—H10A108.1
H2A—C2—H2B107.6C9—C10—H10B108.1
C3—C2—H2A108.6C9—C10—C11116.8 (6)
C3—C2—H2B108.6H10A—C10—H10B107.3
C2—C3—C2i111.0 (4)C11—C10—H10A108.1
C4i—C3—C2i109.02 (17)C11—C10—H10B108.1
C4i—C3—C2108.81 (18)C10—C11—H11A107.4
C4—C3—C2i108.81 (18)C10—C11—H11B107.4
C4—C3—C2109.02 (17)H11A—C11—H11B106.9
C4i—C3—C4110.2 (3)C12—C11—C10119.7 (8)
N1—C4—C3121.5 (2)C12—C11—H11A107.4
N1—C4—C5106.7 (3)C12—C11—H11B107.4
C5—C4—C3131.7 (3)C11—C12—H12A109.5
C4—C5—H5125.7C11—C12—H12B109.5
C4—C5—C6108.7 (3)C11—C12—H12C109.5
C6—C5—H5125.7H12A—C12—H12B109.5
C5—C6—H6126.4H12A—C12—H12C109.5
C7—C6—C5107.1 (3)H12B—C12—H12C109.5
C7—C6—H6126.4
O2—C9—C10—C11−62.9 (8)C4i—C3—C4—N144.80 (19)
N1—C4—C5—C60.7 (4)C4i—C3—C4—C5−140.2 (4)
N1—C7—C8—O1−8.2 (5)C4—C5—C6—C7−0.5 (4)
N1—C7—C8—O2171.6 (3)C5—C6—C7—N10.1 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C2i59.3 (3)C5—C6—C7—C8−178.0 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4−60.5 (4)C6—C7—C8—O1169.8 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C4i179.2 (3)C6—C7—C8—O2−10.4 (5)
C2—C3—C4—N1−74.5 (3)C7—N1—C4—C3175.5 (2)
C2i—C3—C4—N1164.3 (3)C7—N1—C4—C5−0.6 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5100.5 (4)C8—O2—C9—C10170.1 (5)
C2i—C3—C4—C5−20.7 (4)C9—O2—C8—O11.8 (6)
C3—C4—C5—C6−174.9 (3)C9—O2—C8—C7−178.0 (4)
C4—N1—C7—C60.3 (3)C9—C10—C11—C12−177.5 (6)
C4—N1—C7—C8178.7 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1ii0.862.122.962 (3)165
C12—H12C···Cg1iii0.963.213.944 (3)135
  9 in total

1.  Noncovalent Synthesis Using Hydrogen Bonding.

Authors:  Leonard J. Prins; David N. Reinhoudt; Peter Timmerman
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2001-07-02       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Synthesis, computational modeling, and properties of benzo-appended BODIPYs.

Authors:  Timsy Uppal; Xiaoke Hu; Frank R Fronczek; Stephanie Maschek; Petia Bobadova-Parvanova; M Graça H Vicente
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Colorimetric sensing of fluoride ion by new expanded calix[4]pyrrole through anion-π interaction.

Authors:  Sanjeev P Mahanta; B Sathish Kumar; Sambath Baskaran; Chinnappan Sivasankar; Pradeepta K Panda
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  Hydrogen bond assisted helical self-assembly into [n]catenane.

Authors:  Zhenming Yin; Yanhua Zhang; Jiaqi He; Jin-Pei Cheng
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Dibenzyl 3,3'-diethyl-4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-methylenebis(pyrrole-5-carboxylate).

Authors:  Hee-Joon Kim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-02-10

7.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

8.  Non-cyclic formylated dipyrromethanes as phosphate anion receptors.

Authors:  Murat K Deliomeroglu; Vincent M Lynch; Jonathan L Sessler
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 9.825

9.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Exploration of Noncovalent Interactions, Chemical Reactivity, and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Piperidone Derivatives: A Concise Theoretical Approach.

Authors:  Muhammad Khalid; Akbar Ali; Muhammad Fayyaz Ur Rehman; Muhammad Mustaqeem; Shehbaz Ali; Muhammad Usman Khan; Sumreen Asim; Naseeb Ahmad; Muhammad Saleem
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-05-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.