Literature DB >> 3139180

Maternal height, shoe size, and outcome of labour in white primigravidas: a prospective anthropometric study.

T A Mahmood1, D M Campbell, A W Wilson.   

Abstract

A total of 563 white primigravid patients at Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, were recruited in a prospective study to examine the association between maternal height, shoe size, and the outcome of labour. There was a significantly increased caesarean section rate in women of short stature but no association between mode of delivery and shoe size. Babies born vaginally had heavier birth weights with increasing height and shoe size. Babies born by caesarean section were heavier than those born vaginally, but their birthweight showed no relation with either height or shoe size. Shoe size is not a useful clinical predictor for the probability of cephalopelvic disproportion, and, although maternal height is a better clinical guide to pelvic adequacy in labour, 80% of mothers less than 160 cm tall delivered vaginally. A well conducted trial of labour should be considered in all primigravid patients with cephalic presentation irrespective of maternal height or shoe size if no obstetric complication exists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3139180      PMCID: PMC1840354          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.297.6647.515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  2 in total

1.  Extra-amniotic prostaglandin E2 for the induction of labour at term.

Authors:  A A Calder; M P Embrey; K Hillier
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1974-01

2.  Correlation of shoe size and obstetric outcome: an anthropometric study.

Authors:  J L Kennedy; E Greenwald
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-06-15       Impact factor: 8.661

  2 in total
  15 in total

1.  The relationship between anthropometric measurements and the bony pelvis in African American and European American women.

Authors:  Beri Ridgeway; Beatriz E Arias; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Between Scylla and Charybdis: renegotiating resolution of the 'obstetric dilemma' in response to ecological change.

Authors:  Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  An analysis of the prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion.

Authors:  E Hanzal; C Kainz; G Hoffmann; J Deutinger
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Variation of distances from mid-urethra to the obturator foramen: an MRI study.

Authors:  Petr Hubka; Stergios K Doumouchtsis; Mitchell B Berger; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Prenatal predictors of cesarean section due to labor arrest.

Authors:  D M Harper; C A Johnson; W H Harper; B S Liese
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Cesarean section and operative vaginal delivery in low-risk primiparous women, Western Australia.

Authors:  A W Read; W J Prendiville; V P Dawes; F J Stanley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Influence of maternal nutritional status on mode of delivery and asphyxia neonatorum.

Authors:  N Thilothammal; K G Kamala; T P Ashok; S Ramanujam; K Nedunchelian; S S Ahmed; N Mala
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Lorie M Harper; Anthony O Odibo; David M Stamilio; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Maternal obesity and labour complications following induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy.

Authors:  S Arrowsmith; S Wray; S Quenby
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Short stature as an independent risk factor for cephalopelvic disproportion in a country of relatively small-sized mothers.

Authors:  Rusleena Toh-Adam; Kasemsri Srisupundit; Theera Tongsong
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.