Literature DB >> 23467050

Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery.

Lorie M Harper1, Anthony O Odibo, David M Stamilio, George A Macones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether x-ray measures of the mid pelvis can be used to predict cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: Women were enrolled prospectively; x-ray pelvimetry was performed after delivery; the readers were blinded to the outcome. Groups were determined by mid pelvis measures (transverse diameter, anteroposterior diameter, and circumference ≤ 10th percentile. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Univariable, stratified, and multivariable analyses were performed to estimate the effect of mid pelvis measures on cesarean delivery. Receiver operator characteristics curves were created to estimate the predictive value of mid pelvis measures of cesarean delivery.
RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-six women were included. Subjects with anteroposterior diameter or circumference ≤ 10th percentile were at greater risk of cesarean delivery (risk ratio for anteroposterior diameter, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-5.8; risk ratio for circumference ≤ 10th percentile, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-4.8). Transverse diameter ≤ 10th percentile was not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. The area under the receiver operator characteristics curves for anteroposterior diameter, circumference ≤ 10th percentile, and transverse diameter were 0.88, 0.85, and 0.69, respectively (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Simple radiographic measures of the mid pelvis on x-ray can provide a useful adjunct to clinical information in the determination of who should attempt a vaginal delivery.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23467050      PMCID: PMC3672361          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  21 in total

1.  The relationship between shoe size and mode of delivery.

Authors:  R E Gorman; A Noble; C M Andrews
Journal:  Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ       Date:  1997

2.  ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 299, September 2004 (replaces No. 158, September 1995). Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The pelvic outlet. A comparison between clinical evaluation and radiologic pelvimetry.

Authors:  J Floberg; P Belfrage; M Carlsson; H Ohlsen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  A prospective evaluation of X-ray pelvimetry.

Authors:  D W Laube; M W Varner; D P Cruikshank
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at term.

Authors:  R C Pattinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

6.  Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Helain J Landy; Judith U Hibbard; Shoshana Haberman; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Matthew K Hoffman; Kimberly D Gregory; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Christos G Hatjis; Paul van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A retrospective review of performance and utility of routine clinical pelvimetry.

Authors:  Charles S Blackadar; Anthony J Viera
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 9.  Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis.

Authors:  A Cristina Rossi; Vincenzo D'Addario
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Short stature as an independent risk factor for cephalopelvic disproportion in a country of relatively small-sized mothers.

Authors:  Rusleena Toh-Adam; Kasemsri Srisupundit; Theera Tongsong
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.344

View more
  7 in total

1.  Which Foetal-Pelvic Variables Are Useful for Predicting Caesarean Section and Instrumental Assistance?

Authors:  P Frémondière; L Thollon; P Adalian; J Delotte; F Marchal
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Uterine contractions' pattern in active phase of labor as a predictor of failure to progress.

Authors:  Tahereh Galinimoghaddam; Narges Moslemizadeh; Zahra Seifollahpour; Zohreh Shahhosseini; Mahmonier Danesh
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-03-24

3.  Pelvimetry by Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Non-Pregnant Multiparous Women Who Delivered Vaginally.

Authors:  Ismail Salk; Ali Cetin; Sultan Salk; Meral Cetin
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-08

4.  Intra- and inter-rater reliability in a comparative study of cross-sectional and spiral computed tomography pelvimetry methods.

Authors:  Erika Phexell; Anna Åkesson; Marcus Söderberg; Anetta Bolejko
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2019-06-11

5.  Cervical ripening with low-dose prostaglandins in planned vaginal birth after cesarean.

Authors:  Thomas Schmitz; Anne-Gaelle Pourcelot; Constance Moutafoff; Valérie Biran; Olivier Sibony; Jean-François Oury
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Determining the Incidence of Gynecoid Pelvis Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Nonpregnant Multiparous Women.

Authors:  Ismail Salk; Meral Cetin; Sultan Salk; Ali Cetin
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.927

7.  Developmental origins of variability in pelvic dimensions: Evidence from nulliparous South Asian women in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Meghan K Shirley; Tim J Cole; Owen J Arthurs; Chris A Clark; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 1.937

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.