Literature DB >> 31391600

Is there a due diligence standard for wildlife disease surveillance? A Canadian case study.

Craig Stephen1, Patrick Zimmer1, Michael Lee1.   

Abstract

Due diligence is a concept used to justify investment in wildlife health surveillance to satisfy trading partners and other animal health stakeholders. Canadian literature and legislation were reviewed and key informant interviews were used to determine if a wildlife surveillance due diligence standard existed. Wildlife surveillance is constrained by challenges that necessitate convenience and opportunistic sampling, making it difficult to apply surveillance performance standards from public or domestic animal health. Key informants cited due diligence to justify wildlife health surveillance activities but could not identify a due diligence threshold nor could regulations, international obligations, or the literature. The lack of a due diligence standard puts wildlife health surveillance managers at a disadvantage when trying to show public return on investment or when assessing the adequacy of surveillance efforts. Steps being taken by the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative to meet the performance needs of the Pan-Canadian Approach to Wildlife Health are introduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31391600      PMCID: PMC6625171     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN: 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  8 in total

Review 1.  Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife--threats to biodiversity and human health.

Authors:  P Daszak; A A Cunningham; A D Hyatt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Opportunities and obstacles to collecting wildlife disease data for public health purposes: results of a pilot study on Vancouver Island, British Columbia.

Authors:  Tyler Stitt; Julie Mountifield; Craig Stephen
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group.

Authors:  R R German; L M Lee; J M Horan; R L Milstein; C A Pertowski; M N Waller
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2001-07-27

Review 4.  Proposed attributes of national wildlife health programmes.

Authors:  C Stephen; J Sleeman; N Nguyen; P Zimmer; J P Duff; D Gavier-Widen; T Grillo; H Lee; J Rijks; M P Ryser-Degiorgis; T Tana; M M Uhart
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.181

5.  Environmental radionuclide monitoring of Canadian harbours: a decade of analyses in support of due diligence activities by the Royal Canadian Navy.

Authors:  David G Kelly; Kristine M Mattson; Curtis McDonald; Kathy S Nielsen; Ron D Weir
Journal:  J Environ Radioact       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Using a Harm Reduction Approach in an Environmental Case Study of Fish and Wildlife Health.

Authors:  Craig Stephen; Julie Wittrock; Joy Wade
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.184

7.  A weighted surveillance approach for detecting chronic wasting disease foci.

Authors:  Daniel P Walsh; Michael W Miller
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.535

8.  Wildlife health investigations: needs, challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.741

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.