Literature DB >> 30964459

Proposed attributes of national wildlife health programmes.

C Stephen, J Sleeman, N Nguyen, P Zimmer, J P Duff, D Gavier-Widen, T Grillo, H Lee, J Rijks, M P Ryser-Degiorgis, T Tana, M M Uhart.   

Abstract

Wildlife health is important for conservation, healthy ecosystems, sustainable development and biosecurity. It presents unique challenges for national programme governance and delivery because wildlife health not only crosses jurisdictional responsibilities and authorities but also inherently spans multiple sectors of expertise. The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) encourages its Members to have wildlife disease monitoring and notification systems. Where national wildlife health surveillance programmes do exist, they vary in scope and size. Evidence-based guidance is lacking on the critical functions and roles needed to meet the OIE's recommendations and other expectations of a national programme. A literature review and consultation with national wildlife health programme leaders identified five key attributes of national programmes: 1) being knowledge and science based; 2) fostering cross-nation equivalence and harmonisation; 3) developing partnerships and national coordination; 4) providing leadership and administration of national efforts; and 5) capacity development. Proposed core purposes include: 1) establishment and communication of the national wildlife health status; 2) leading national planning; 3) centralising information and expertise; 4) developing national networks leading to harmonisation and collaborations; 5) developing wildlife health workforces; and 6) centralising administration and management of national programmes. A national wildlife health programme should aim to identify, effectively communicate and manage the risk to or from a country's wildlife populations. It should generate the appropriate knowledge required to improve the effectiveness of wildlife policies and systems, including identifying and assessing emerging priorities, thus facilitating early warning, preparedness and preventive actions. © World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), 2018

Keywords:  Design; Disease; Function; Health; National; Programme; Purpose; Surveillance; Wildlife

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30964459     DOI: 10.20506/37.3.2896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Tech        ISSN: 0253-1933            Impact factor:   1.181


  2 in total

Review 1.  Is there a due diligence standard for wildlife disease surveillance? A Canadian case study.

Authors:  Craig Stephen; Patrick Zimmer; Michael Lee
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  The effectiveness of bovine tuberculosis surveillance in Dutch badgers.

Authors:  Mario Orrico; Gerdien van Schaik; Ad Koets; Jan van den Broek; Margriet Montizaan; Maurice La Haye; Jolianne M Rijks
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.521

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.