Sol-Ki Kim1, Hyo Sung Kwak2, Gyung Ho Chung1, Seung-Bae Hwang1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, 567 Baekje-daero, deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, 561-756, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, 567 Baekje-daero, deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, 561-756, Republic of Korea. kwak8140@jbnu.ac.kr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The pathophysiologic mechanisms of contrast enhancement (CE) of middle cerebral artery (MCA) plaque remain unclear since histologic and imaging findings have never been compared. The purpose of this study was to assess the pattern of CE between patients with MCA stenosis or occlusion and in an MCA stenotic silicone model. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed black blood (BB) contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) imaging of patients who presented with acute stroke symptoms between January 2017 and January 2018. We subdivided the enrolled subjects according to whether the cerebral angiography findings suggested stenosis or occlusion. Silicone models were made with 4 degrees of MCA stenosis (stenotic area: 0.8 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.2 mm, and 1.4 mm) with a 3-mm lumen. BB CE-T1W imaging on silicone models with stenosis was obtained 5 min after contrast injection. RESULTS: During the period of this study, 19 patients with complete MCA occlusion and 22 with MCA stenosis, as shown by the cerebral angiography, were enrolled in this study. The CE of the silicone models with stenosis were 0.8 (74%) mm and 1.0 (66.7%) mm. The SI ratios of the CE of the plaque and the lumen were similar between the silicone models and the MCA stenosis/occlusion groups (silicone models: 31.0 ± 11.2; MCA occlusion: 27.6 ± 19.6; MCA stenosis: 22.8 ± 9.8). CONCLUSION: The silicone stenotic MCA model was characterized by luminal enhancement through contrast stagnation. The findings of the CE of the MCA plaque may be partially associated with stagnation of the contrast media.
PURPOSE: The pathophysiologic mechanisms of contrast enhancement (CE) of middle cerebral artery (MCA) plaque remain unclear since histologic and imaging findings have never been compared. The purpose of this study was to assess the pattern of CE between patients with MCA stenosis or occlusion and in an MCA stenotic silicone model. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed black blood (BB) contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) imaging of patients who presented with acute stroke symptoms between January 2017 and January 2018. We subdivided the enrolled subjects according to whether the cerebral angiography findings suggested stenosis or occlusion. Silicone models were made with 4 degrees of MCA stenosis (stenotic area: 0.8 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.2 mm, and 1.4 mm) with a 3-mm lumen. BB CE-T1W imaging on silicone models with stenosis was obtained 5 min after contrast injection. RESULTS: During the period of this study, 19 patients with complete MCA occlusion and 22 with MCA stenosis, as shown by the cerebral angiography, were enrolled in this study. The CE of the silicone models with stenosis were 0.8 (74%) mm and 1.0 (66.7%) mm. The SI ratios of the CE of the plaque and the lumen were similar between the silicone models and the MCA stenosis/occlusion groups (silicone models: 31.0 ± 11.2; MCA occlusion: 27.6 ± 19.6; MCA stenosis: 22.8 ± 9.8). CONCLUSION: The silicone stenotic MCA model was characterized by luminal enhancement through contrast stagnation. The findings of the CE of the MCA plaque may be partially associated with stagnation of the contrast media.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atherosclerosis; Contrast media; Magnetic resonance imaging; Phantom
Authors: C Zhu; X Tian; A J Degnan; Z Shi; X Zhang; L Chen; Z Teng; D Saloner; J Lu; Q Liu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jianming Cai; Thomas S Hatsukami; Marina S Ferguson; William S Kerwin; Tobias Saam; Baocheng Chu; Norihide Takaya; Nayak L Polissar; Chun Yuan Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-11-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bruce A Wasserman; William I Smith; Hugh H Trout; Richard O Cannon; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: R H Swartz; S S Bhuta; R I Farb; R Agid; R A Willinsky; K G Terbrugge; J Butany; B A Wasserman; D M Johnstone; F L Silver; D J Mikulis Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ye Qiao; Steven R Zeiler; Saeedeh Mirbagheri; Richard Leigh; Victor Urrutia; Robert Wityk; Bruce A Wasserman Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 11.105