Literature DB >> 19221296

Intracranial arterial wall imaging using high-resolution 3-tesla contrast-enhanced MRI.

R H Swartz1, S S Bhuta, R I Farb, R Agid, R A Willinsky, K G Terbrugge, J Butany, B A Wasserman, D M Johnstone, F L Silver, D J Mikulis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conventional arterial imaging focuses on the vessel lumen but lacks specificity because different pathologies produce similar luminal defects. Wall imaging can characterize extracranial arterial pathology, but imaging intracranial walls has been limited by resolution and signal constraints. Higher-field scanners may improve visualization of these smaller vessels.
METHODS: Three-tesla contrast-enhanced MRI was used to study the intracranial arteries from a consecutive series of patients at a tertiary stroke center.
RESULTS: Multiplanar T2-weighted fast spin echo and multiplanar T1 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery precontrast and postcontrast images were acquired in 37 patients with focal neurologic deficits. Clinical diagnoses included atherosclerotic disease (13), CNS inflammatory disease (3), dissections (3), aneurysms (3), moyamoya syndrome (2), cavernous angioma (1), extracranial source of stroke (5), and no definitive clinical diagnosis (7). Twelve of 13 with atherosclerotic disease had focal, eccentric vessel wall enhancement, 10 of whom had enhancement only in the vessel supplying the area of ischemic injury. Two of 3 with inflammatory diseases had diffuse, concentric vessel wall enhancement. Three of 3 with dissection showed bright signal on T1, and 2 had irregular wall enhancement with a flap and dual lumen.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-tesla contrast-enhanced MRI can be used to study the wall of intracranial blood vessels. T2 and precontrast and postcontrast T1 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images at 3 tesla may be able to differentiate enhancement patterns of intracranial atherosclerotic plaques (eccentric), inflammation (concentric), and other wall pathologies. Prospective studies are required to determine the sensitivity and specificity of arterial wall imaging for distinguishing the range of pathologic conditions affecting cerebral vasculature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221296     DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000342470.69739.b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  105 in total

1.  New developments in clinical ischemic stroke prevention and treatment and their imaging implications.

Authors:  Jeremy J Heit; Max Wintermark
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Improved black-blood imaging using DANTE-SPACE for simultaneous carotid and intracranial vessel wall evaluation.

Authors:  Yibin Xie; Qi Yang; Guoxi Xie; Jianing Pang; Zhaoyang Fan; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Intraobserver and interobserver variability for measuring the wall area of the basilar artery at the level of the trigeminal ganglion on high-resolution MR images.

Authors:  N Ma; X Lou; T-Q Zhao; E-H-C Wong; W-J Jiang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Pediatric brain MRI, Part 2: Advanced techniques.

Authors:  Mai-Lan Ho; Norbert G Campeau; Thang D Ngo; Unni K Udayasankar; Kirk M Welker
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13

5.  Comparison of 3D magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography for intracranial artery stenosis.

Authors:  Ji Eun Park; Seung Chai Jung; Sang Hun Lee; Ji Young Jeon; Ji Ye Lee; Ho Sung Kim; Choong-Gon Choi; Sang Joon Kim; Deok Hee Lee; Seon-Ok Kim; Sun U Kwon; Dong-Wha Kang; Jong S Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  MRI Vessel Wall Imaging after Intra-Arterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  A Lindenholz; I C van der Schaaf; A G van der Kolk; H B van der Worp; A A Harteveld; L J Kappelle; J Hendrikse
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Assessment of quantitative methods for enhancement measurement on vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intracranial atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Matthew D Alexander; Adam de Havenon; Seong-Eun Kim; Dennis L Parker; Joseph S McNally
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  MR angiography and imaging for the evaluation of middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  A J Degnan; G Gallagher; Z Teng; J Lu; Q Liu; J H Gillard
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Impact of vessel wall lesions and vascular stenoses on cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with intracranial stenotic disease.

Authors:  Petrice M Cogswell; Taylor L Davis; Megan K Strother; Carlos C Faraco; Allison O Scott; Lori C Jordan; Matthew R Fusco; Blaise deB Frederick; Jeroen Hendrikse; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Etiology of intracranial stenosis in young patients: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Yu-Yuan Xu; Ming-Li Li; Shan Gao; Zheng-Yu Jin; Zhao-Yong Sun; Jie Chen; Bo Hou; Hai-Long Zhou; Feng Feng; Wei-Hai Xu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.