| Literature DB >> 31388341 |
Irena Markova1, Martina Hüttl1, Olena Oliyarnyk1, Tereza Kacerova2, Martin Haluzik1, Petr Kacer3, Ondrej Seda4, Hana Malinska1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dicarbonyl stress plays an important role in the pathogenesis of microvascular complications that precede the formation of advanced glycation end products, and contributes to the development of renal dysfunction. In renal cells, toxic metabolites like methylglyoxal lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and protein structure modifications.In our study, we investigated the effect of methylglyoxal on metabolic, transcriptomic, metabolomic and proteomic profiles in the context of the development of kidney impairment in the model of metabolic syndrome.Entities:
Keywords: Kidney dysfunction; Metabolic syndrome; Metabolomics; Methylglyoxal; Microvascular complications; Proteomics; Transcriptomics
Year: 2019 PMID: 31388341 PMCID: PMC6670216 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-019-0376-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Metabolic parameters in serum and tissues in HHTg rats and after methylglyoxal administration (HHTg + MGO)
| HHTg | HHTg + MGO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 412 ± 3 | 397 ± 6 | n.s. |
| Glucose (mmol/l) | 7.1 ± 0.2 | 8.8 ± 0.2 | 0.001 |
| Insulin (μmol/l) | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 0.05 |
| AUC0–120 mmol/l | 930 ± 26 | 1006 ± 18 | 0.05 |
| FFA (mmol/l) | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | n.s. |
| Adiponectin (μg/ml) | 2.90 ± 0.34 | 2.78 ± 0.51 | n.s. |
| Serum triglycerides (mmol/l) | 4.80 ± 0.49 | 3.21 ± 0.51 | 0.05 |
| Serum cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.19 ± 0.07 | 1.56 ± 0.99 | 0.05 |
| HDL-C (mmol/l) | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 1.06 ± 0.14 | 0.05 |
| Triglycerides in the liver (μmol/g) | 13.01 ± 1.58 | 13.02 ± 0.94 | n.s. |
| Triglycerides in the kidney (μmol/g) | 8.55 ± 1.61 | 6.81 ± 1.16 | n.s. |
| Methylglyoxal in serum (nmol/ml) | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Methylglyoxal in the kidney (nmol/mg) | 0.59 ± 0.08 | 0.86 ± 0.09 | 0.01 |
| Methylglyoxal in the liver (nmol/mg) | 1.62 ± 0.12 | 5.26 ± 0.58 | 0.001 |
Data are mean ± SEM; n = 8
Fig. 1Effect of MGO treatment on urinary albumin (Panel a) and oxidative stress parameters in the kidney. Ratio of reduced to oxidised glutathione (Panel b); glutathione reductase activity (Panel c) and glutathione transferase activity (Panel d). Data (panels a-d) are measured in doublets using n = 8 rats per group per analyses. Data are expressed as means (SEM) and analysed by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Fig. 2Effect of MGO treatment on relative expression of nuclear factor NRF2 and the GLO1 enzyme in the kidney. Relative expression of nuclear factor, erythroid 2 like 2 (NRF2, Panel a) and glyoxalase 1 (GLO1, Panel b) in the kidneys of MGO-treated vs. control male hereditary hypertriglyceridaemic rats (HHTg). Data (panels a-b) are measured in triplets using n = 8 rats per group per analyses. Data are expressed as means (SEM) and analysed by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Fig. 3Significantly enriched canonical pathways in MGO-treated rats. Canonical pathways were identified using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, Qiagen Redwood City, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA). Bars indicate significance levels of individual pathways (scored as –log (p-value) based on Fisher’s exact test, upper x-axis); “threshold” (yellow line) indicates the Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected minimum significance level. Ratio (square markers connected by line, lower x-axis) refers to the number of genes from the dataset that map to the shown pathway divided by the total number of molecules that define the canonical pathway within the IPA knowledge base. Shades of orange and blue are proportional to values of positive or negative z-scores and used for evaluating the overall activation or inhibition of a given pathway
Proteomic and metabolomic markers in urine
| HHTg | HHTg + MGO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Proteomic markers | |||
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 44.33 ± 2.31 | 91.43 ± 5.88 | 0.001 |
| IL-8 (pg/ml) | 18.33 ± 0.29 | 49.43 ± 1.60 | 0.001 |
| MCP-1 (ng/ml) | 1.57 ± 0.02 | 3.76 ± 0.21 | 0.001 |
| EGF (ng/ml) | 4.95 ± 0.17 | 2.27 ± 0.01 | 0.001 |
| α-1 antitrypsin (ng/ml) | 13.90 ± 2.89 | 24.47 ± 2.11 | 0.001 |
| IgA-uromodulin (ng/ml) | 60.50 ± 5.20 | 68.71 ± 0.80 | 0.05 |
| Tumstatin (pg/ml) | 79.33 ± 1.15 | 68.00 ± 5.61 | n.s. |
| Endostatin (pg/ml) | 71.50 ± 4.04 | 102.14 ± 5.08 | 0.01 |
| Heparan sulphate (μg/ml) | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Metabolomic markers | |||
| Malondialdehyde (ng/ml) | 22.25 ± 0.61 | 31.40 ± 0.32 | 0.001 |
| 4-hydroxyhexenal (ng/ml) | 14.77 ± 0.43 | 23.71 ± 0.76 | 0.001 |
| 4-hydroxynonenal (ng/ml) | 23.93 ± 0.12 | 32.72 ± 0.55 | 0.001 |
| Hexanal (ng/ml) | 15.82 ± 0.52 | 20.30 ± 0.56 | 0.01 |
| Heptanal (ng/ml) | 22.68 ± 0.20 | 28.62 ± 1.12 | 0.01 |
| Octanal (ng/ml) | 10.07 ± 0.09 | 11.87 ± 0.40 | 0.001 |
| Nonanal (ng/ml) | 12.20 ± 0.17 | 14.96 ± 0.07 | 0.001 |
| Decanal (ng/ml) | 9.35 ± 0.23 | 11.34 ± 0.32 | 0.001 |
| Dodecanal (ng/ml) | 6.77 ± 0.35 | 7.39 ± 0.32 | n.s. |
| 8-isoprostane (pg/ml) | 21.33 ± 0.29 | 29.09 ± 3.53 | 0.01 |
| 3-nitrotyrosine (pg/ml) | 49.67 ± 0.01 | 71.60 ± 0.53 | 0.001 |
| o-nitrotyrosine (pg/ml) | 57.17 ± 1.15 | 77.36 ± 1.49 | 0.001 |
| 3-chlorotyrosine (pg/ml) | 22.67 ± 2.02 | 35.54 ± 1.60 | 0.01 |
| 8-hydroxyguanosine (pg/ml) | 198.00 ± 4.91 | 231.54 ± 3.69 | 0.05 |
| 5-hydroxymethyluracil (pg/ml) | 93.00 ± 2.02 | 115.07 ± 13.76 | 0.05 |
| Leukotriene B4 (pg/ml) | 48.17 ± 8.66 | 81.86 ± 28.86 | n.s. |
| Leukotriene C4 (pg/ml) | 64.17 ± 4.91 | 66.67 ± 0.53 | n.s. |
| Leukotriene D4 (pg/ml) | 53.83 ± 1.73 | 60.69 ± 1.64 | 0.05 |
| Leukotriene E4 (pg/ml) | 119.17 ± 5.77 | 120.72 ± 0.12 | n.s. |
Data are shown as mean ± SEM; n = 8/group