Literature DB >> 31387870

Effect of Size on Solid Tumor Disposition of Protein Therapeutics.

Zhe Li1, Yingyi Li1, Hsuan-Ping Chang1, Hsueh-Yuan Chang1, Leiming Guo1, Dhaval K Shah2.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the effect of size on tumor disposition of protein therapeutics, including the plasma and tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) of trastuzumab (∼150 kDa), FcRn-nonbinding trastuzumab (∼150 kDa), F(ab)2 fragment of trastuzumab (∼100 kDa), Fab fragment of trastuzumab (∼50 kDa), and trastuzumab scFv (∼27 kDa) in both antigen (i.e., HER2)-overexpressing (N87) and antigen-nonexpressing (MDA-MB-468) tumor-bearing mice. The observed data were used to develop the maximum tumor uptake versus molecular weight and tumor-to-plasma area under the curve (AUC) ratio versus molecular weight relationships. Comparison of the PK of different sizes of FcRn nonbinding molecules in target-expressing tumor showed that ∼100 kDa is an optimal size to achieve maximum tumor uptake and ∼50 kDa is an optimal size to achieve maximum tumor-to-plasma exposure ratio of protein therapeutics. The PK data were also used to validate a systems PK model for tumor disposition of different-sized protein therapeutics. The PK model was able to predict a priori the PK of all five molecules in both tumor types reasonably well (within 2- to 3-fold). In addition, the model captured the bell-shaped relationships observed between maximum tumor uptake and molecular weight and between tumor-to-plasma AUC ratio and molecular weight. Our results provide an unprecedented insight into the effect of size and target engagement on the tumor PK of protein therapeutics. Our results also provide further validation of the tumor disposition model, which can be used to support discovery, development, and preclinical-to-clinical translation of different sizes of protein therapeutics. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This article highlights the importance of molecular size and target engagement on the tumor disposition of protein therapeutics. Our results suggest that ∼100 kDa is an optimal size to achieve maximum tumor uptake and ∼50 kDa is an optimal size to achieve maximum tumor-to-plasma exposure ratio for non-FcRn-binding targeted protein therapeutics. We also demonstrate that a systems pharmacokinetics model developed to characterize tumor disposition of protein therapeutics can predict a priori the disposition of different-sized protein therapeutics in target-expressing and target-nonexpressing solid tumors.
Copyright © 2019 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31387870      PMCID: PMC6756290          DOI: 10.1124/dmd.119.087809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  17 in total

1.  Theoretical analysis of antibody targeting of tumor spheroids: importance of dosage for penetration, and affinity for retention.

Authors:  Christilyn P Graff; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Influence of molecular size on tissue distribution of antibody fragments.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Ben-Fillippo Krippendorff; Sharad Sharma; Antje C Walz; Thierry Lavé; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 3.  Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains.

Authors:  Philipp Holliger; Peter J Hudson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Determination of Cellular Processing Rates for a Trastuzumab-Maytansinoid Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Highlights Key Parameters for ADC Design.

Authors:  Katie F Maass; Chethana Kulkarni; Alison M Betts; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Influence of Molecular size on the clearance of antibody fragments.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Ben-Fillippo Krippendorff; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Antibody constructs in cancer therapy: protein engineering strategies to improve exposure in solid tumors.

Authors:  Robert A Beckman; Louis M Weiner; Hugh M Davis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Bench to bedside translation of antibody drug conjugates using a multiscale mechanistic PK/PD model: a case study with brentuximab-vedotin.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Nahor Haddish-Berhane; Alison Betts
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Extravascular diffusion in normal and neoplastic tissues.

Authors:  L J Nugent; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  A modeling analysis of the effects of molecular size and binding affinity on tumor targeting.

Authors:  Michael M Schmidt; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.261

10.  Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict IgG tissue kinetics in wild-type and FcRn-knockout mice.

Authors:  Amit Garg; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 2.745

View more
  7 in total

1.  EpCAM- and EGFR-Specific Antibody Drug Conjugates for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Chaoyu Zhang; Wenjie Sheng; Marwah Al-Rawe; T M Mohiuddin; Marcus Niebert; Felix Zeppernick; Ivo Meihold-Heerlein; Ahmad Fawzi Hussain
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Maximizing response to intratumoral immunotherapy in mice by tuning local retention.

Authors:  Joseph R Palmeri; Emi A Lutz; Noor Momin; Noor Jailkhani; Howard Mak; Anthony Tabet; Magnolia M Chinn; Byong H Kang; Virginia Spanoudaki; Richard O Hynes; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibody and Antibody Fragments in the Mouse Eye Following Systemic Administration.

Authors:  David Bussing; Zhe Li; Yingyi Li; Hsuan-Ping Chang; Hsueh-Yuan Chang; Leiming Guo; Ashwni Verma; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Effect of molecular size on interstitial pharmacokinetics and tissue catabolism of antibodies.

Authors:  Hanine Rafidi; Sharmila Rajan; Konnie Urban; Whitney Shatz-Binder; Keliana Hui; Gregory Z Ferl; Amrita V Kamath; C Andrew Boswell
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 6.440

5.  Leveraging a physiologically-based quantitative translational modeling platform for designing B cell maturation antigen-targeting bispecific T cell engagers for treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tomoki Yoneyama; Mi-Sook Kim; Konstantin Piatkov; Haiqing Wang; Andy Z X Zhu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.779

6.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Tumor Disposition.

Authors:  Brandon M Bordeau; Joseph Ryan Polli; Ferdinand Schweser; Hans Peter Grimm; Wolfgang F Richter; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Targeting cancer with antibody-drug conjugates: Promises and challenges.

Authors:  Alexis Q Dean; Shen Luo; Julianne D Twomey; Baolin Zhang
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.