| Literature DB >> 31387551 |
Kanako Hayashi1, Maya Izumi1, Ayaka Isobe1, Yuhei Mastuda2, Sumio Akifusa3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The changed disease landscape in Japan because of an increasing aging population has contributed to an increase in convalescent inpatients, warranting important considerations of their oral care needs. However, information on the oral state of these inpatients is scarce. We evaluated the correlation between the number of residual teeth and tongue hygiene state in these inpatients.Entities:
Keywords: Convalescent ward; Inpatient; OHAT; Saliva; Tongue
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31387551 PMCID: PMC6685273 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0869-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Correlation between number of residual teeth and OHAT subscales analyzed with Pearson coefficient of correlation
| variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tooth number | – | |||||||
| 2 | lip | 0.034 | – | ||||||
| 3 | tongue | −0.221* | −0.078 | – | |||||
| 4 | gum/tissue | −0.049 | 0.173 | 0.048 | – | ||||
| 5 | saliva | −0.210* | 0.066 | 0.394** | 0.196 | – | |||
| 6 | natural teeth | 0.117 | 0.114 | −.233* | 0.489** | −0.123 | – | ||
| 7 | denture | −0.305** | 0.143 | 0.031 | 0.046 | 0.238* | −0.033 | – | |
| 8 | oral cleanliness | 0.192 | 0.059 | −0.044 | 0.497** | 0.261* | 0.432** | 0.125 | – |
| 9 | dental pain | −0.072 | 0.252* | 0.160 | 0.355** | 0.202 | 0.084 | 0.213* | 0.180 |
*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
Ratio of each OHAT subscale divided by number of residual teeth in inpatients
| OHAT subscales | Residual tooth number | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 19 | > 20 | |||||
| lip | 0 | 41 | (97.6) | 49 | (94.2) | 0.626 |
| > 1 | 1 | (2.4) | 3 | (5.8) | ||
| tongue | 0 | 9 | (21.4) | 22 | (42.3) | 0.047 |
| > 1 | 33 | (78.6) | 30 | (57.7) | ||
| gum/tissue | 0 | 20 | (47.6) | 31 | (59.6) | 0.300 |
| > 1 | 22 | (52.4) | 21 | (40.4) | ||
| saliva | 0 | 13 | (31.0) | 25 | (48.1) | 0.139 |
| > 1 | 29 | (69.0) | 27 | (51.9) | ||
| natural teeth | 0 | 31 | (73.8) | 33 | (63.5) | 0.374 |
| > 1 | 11 | (26.2) | 19 | (36.5) | ||
| denture | 0 | 27 | (64.3) | 48 | (92.3) | 0.001 |
| > 1 | 15 | (35.7) | 4 | (7.7) | ||
| oral cleanliness | 0 | 20 | (47.6) | 21 | (40.4) | 0.534 |
| > 1 | 22 | (52.4) | 31 | (59.6) | ||
| dental pain | 0 | 39 | (92.9) | 49 | (94.2) | 1.000 |
| > 1 | 3 | (7.1) | 3 | (5.8) | ||
| mean score of OHAT | 3.6 ± 1.9 | 2.9 ± 2.2 | 0.134 | |||
Difference of tongue and saliva states by number of residual teeth
| tooth number | tongue | saliva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | > 1 | |||||
| total | 0 | 22 | (57.9) | 9 | (16.1) | > 0.001 |
| > 1 | 16 | (42.1) | 47 | (83.9) | ||
| < 19 | 0 | 5 | (38.5) | 4 | (13.8) | 0.084 |
| > 1 | 8 | (61.5) | 25 | (86.2) | ||
| > 20 | 0 | 17 | (68.0) | 5 | (18.5) | > 0.001 |
| > 1 | 8 | (32.0) | 22 | (81.5) | ||
Association between states of tongue and saliva divided by number of residual teeth determined using logistic regression
| tooth number | saliva | Crude OR | Adjusted a OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | 0 | 1.00 (ref.) | < 0.001 | 1.00 (ref.) | < 0.001 |
| > 1 | 7.18 (2.75–18.77) | 10.49 (2.86–38.51) | |||
| < 19 | 0 | 1.00 (ref.) | 0.092 | 1.00 (ref.) | 0.068 |
| > 1 | 3.75 (0.81–17.48) | 6.26 (0.87–44.91) | |||
| > 20 | 0 | 1.00 (ref.) | 0.002 | 1.00 (ref.) | 0.006 |
| > 1 | 7.70 (2.09–28.34) | 22.27 (2.42–205.28) |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aadjusted with age, sex, receiving odontotherapy, primary cause for hospitalization, receiving medicines with oral side-effect, hospital