Literature DB >> 31386761

Predicting gamma passing rates for portal dosimetry-based IMRT QA using machine learning.

Dao Lam1, Xizhe Zhang2, Harold Li1, Yang Deshan1, Brayden Schott1, Tianyu Zhao1, Weixiong Zhang3, Sasa Mutic1, Baozhou Sun1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) measurements are routinely performed prior to treatment delivery to verify dose calculation and delivery accuracy. In this work, we applied a machine learning-based approach to predict portal dosimetry based IMRT QA gamma passing rates.
METHODS: 182 IMRT plans for various treatment sites were planned and delivered with portal dosimetry on two TrueBeam and two Trilogy LINACs. A total of 1497 beams were collected and analyzed using gamma criteria of 2%/2 mm with a 5% threshold. The datasets for building the machine learning models consisted of 1269 beams. Ten-fold cross-validation was utilized to tune the model and prevent "overfitting." A separate test set with the remaining 228 beams was used to evaluate model performance. Each beam was characterized by a set of 31 features including both plan complexity metrics and machine characteristics. Three tree-based machine learning algorithms (AdaBoost, Random Forest, and XGBoost) were used to train the models and predict gamma passing rates.
RESULTS: Both AdaBoost and Random Forest had 98% of predictions within 3% of the measured 2%/2 mm gamma passing rates with a maximum error less than 4% and a mean absolute error < 1%. XGBoost showed a slightly worse prediction accuracy with 95% of the predictions within 3% of the measured gamma passing rates and a maximum error of 4.5%. The three models identified the same nine features in the top 10 most important ones that are related to plan complexity and maximum aperture displacement from the central axis or the maximum jaw size in a beam.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that portal dosimetry IMRT QA gamma passing rates can be accurately predicted using tree-based ensemble learning models. The machine learning based approach allows physicists to better identify the failures of IMRT QA measurements and to develop proactive QA approaches.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMRT; machine learning; portal dosimetry; quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31386761     DOI: 10.1002/mp.13752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Yifei Pi; Kui Ma; Xiaojuan Miao; Sichao Fu; Zhen Zhu; Yifan Cheng; Zhepei Zhang; Hua Chen; Hao Wang; Hengle Gu; Yan Shao; Yanhua Duan; Aihui Feng; Weihai Zhuo; Zhiyong Xu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

2.  Identification of Potential Type II Diabetes in a Large-Scale Chinese Population Using a Systematic Machine Learning Framework.

Authors:  Mingyue Xue; Yinxia Su; Chen Li; Shuxia Wang; Hua Yao
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.011

3.  Commissioning and clinical implementation of an Autoencoder based Classification-Regression model for VMAT patient-specific QA in a multi-institution scenario.

Authors:  Ruijie Yang; Xueying Yang; Le Wang; Dingjie Li; Yuexin Guo; Ying Li; Yumin Guan; Xiangyang Wu; Shouping Xu; Shuming Zhang; Maria F Chan; Lisheng Geng; Jing Sui
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 6.901

4.  Study on the ability of 3D gamma analysis and bio-mathematical model in detecting dose changes caused by dose-calculation-grid-size (DCGS).

Authors:  Han Bai; Sijin Zhu; Xingrao Wu; Xuhong Liu; Feihu Chen; Jiawen Yan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 5.  In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice.

Authors:  Igor Olaciregui-Ruiz; Sam Beddar; Peter Greer; Nuria Jornet; Boyd McCurdy; Gabriel Paiva-Fonseca; Ben Mijnheer; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-08-29

Review 6.  Integration of AI and Machine Learning in Radiotherapy QA.

Authors:  Maria F Chan; Alon Witztum; Gilmer Valdes
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2020-09-29

7.  Influence of beamlet width on dynamic IMRT plan quality in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Manya Wu; Jinhui Jin; Zhenghuan Li; Fantu Kong; Yadi He; Lijiang Liu; Wei Yang; Xiangying Xu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.061

8.  Machine learning models to predict the delivered positions of Elekta multileaf collimator leaves for volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Sruthi Sivabhaskar; Ruiqi Li; Arkajyoti Roy; Neil Kirby; Mohamad Fakhreddine; Nikos Papanikolaou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.243

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.