Literature DB >> 31384783

A novel synthesis, X-ray analysis and computational studies of (Z)-ethyl 2-((Z)-5-((dimethylamino)methylene)- 4-oxo-3-phenylthiazolidin-2-ylidene)acetate as a potential anticancer agent.

Yahia N Mabkhot1, Mohammed M Alharbi2, Salim S Al-Showiman2, Saied M Soliman3,4, Nabila A Kheder5, Wolfgang Frey6, Abdulrhman Asayari7, Abdullatif Bin Muhsinah7, H Algarni8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 4-Thiazolidinone ring is reported to have almost all types of biological activities. Also, it present in many marketed drugs.
RESULTS: Ethyl acetoacetate reacted with phenyl isothiocyanate and ethyl chloroacetate in presence of K2CO3 and DMF to afford the thiazolidinone derivative 5. Thiazolidinone 5 reacted with dimethylformamide-dimethylacetal to afford (Z)-ethyl 2-((Z)-5-((dimethylamino) methylene)-4-oxo-3-phenylthiazolidin-2-ylidene)acetate (6). The structure of thiazolidinone 6 was elucidated from its spectral analysis and X-ray crystallography and was optimized using B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) method. The geometric parameters and NMR spectra were discussed both experimentally and theoretically. Also, the natural charges at the different atomic sites were predicted. The synthesized compounds had moderate cytotoxic activity.
CONCLUSIONS: An unexpected synthesis of (Z)-ethyl 2-((Z)-5-((dimethylamino)methylene)-4-oxo-3-phenylthiazolidin-2-ylidene)acetate via deacetylation mechanism. The structure was established using X-ray and spectral analysis. The geometric parameters, and NMR spectra were discussed. The synthesized compounds showed moderate anticancer activity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational studies; Cytotoxic activity; DMF-DMA; Thiazolidinone; X-ray crystallography

Year:  2019        PMID: 31384783      PMCID: PMC6661753          DOI: 10.1186/s13065-019-0554-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Chem        ISSN: 2661-801X


Introduction

The thiazolidinone ring had diverse biological activities such as antimycobacterial [1], antimicrobial [2], anticancer [3], anticonvulsant [4], antiparasitic [5], antidiabetic [6], and antihypertensive [7]. Also, many clinically used drugs contain thiazolidinone ring in their skeletons such as antibiotic actithiazic acid [8], dual COX/LOX inhibitors (Darbufelone and CI-987) [9], Ralitoline, Etozoline, and Pioglitazone (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Examples of some drugs containing 4-thiazolidinone ring

Examples of some drugs containing 4-thiazolidinone ring Due to this diversity in the biological activities of 4-thiazolidinones, there are several procedures have been reported for their synthesis [10-14]. In this research, we synthesize new 4-thiazolidinone derivative 6 in a pure stat, also, we compare cytotoxic activity of synthesized compounds with standard anticancer drug Vinblastine against the colon carcinoma (HCT-116) cell line using MTT assay.

Results and discussion

Chemistry

The thiazolidinone derivative 5 was prepared according to the reported method [15]. Refluxing of the thiazolidinone 5 with dimethylformamide–dimethylacetal in DMF gave only one isolable product, the product of this reaction is (Z)-ethyl 2-((Z)-5-((dimethylamino) methylene)-4-oxo-3-phenylthiazolidin-2-ylidene)acetate (6) (Scheme 1). Spectral data (IR, NMR, and X-ray were in a complete agreement with the proposed structure.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of thiazolidinones 5 and 6

Synthesis of thiazolidinones 5 and 6 The following reaction mechanism was suggested for the formation of thiazolidinone derivative 6 (Scheme 2). We assumed that the reaction was started between thiazolidinone 5 and dimethylformamide-dimethylacetal to produce an intermediate 7, which underwent enolization of the carbonyl of the acetyl group, followed by elimination of ketene to give the thiazolidinone derivative 6 (Scheme 2). The configuration of thiazolidinone 6 was confirmed using X-ray analysis (Fig. 2) [16].
Scheme 2

The suggested mechanism for the synthesis of thiazolidinone derivative 6

Fig. 2

The ORTEP diagram of the final X-ray model of thiazolidinone 6 with displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability level. H-atoms were placed and not included in refinement

The suggested mechanism for the synthesis of thiazolidinone derivative 6 The ORTEP diagram of the final X-ray model of thiazolidinone 6 with displacement ellipsoids drawn at 50% probability level. H-atoms were placed and not included in refinement

Crystal structure determination

A crystal of dimensions 0.47 × 0.26 × 0.14 mm was selected for X-ray diffraction analysis. Data were collected on a Bruker APEX-II diffractometer equipped with CCD detector and graphite monochromatic Mo Kα radiation (λ = 71,073 Å) at 100 °K. SHELXS-97 [17, 18] was used to solve structure (Table 1). Cell refinement and data reduction were carried out by Bruker SAINT [19]. The final refinement was carried out by full-matrix least-squares techniques with anisotropic thermal data for nonhydrogen atoms on F2. All the hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions. The crystal of thiazolidinone 6 (Fig. 2) was finally refined with R factor of 4.46% for 4622 unique reflections. Molecules were found to be packed in crystal lattice through intermolecular hydrogen bonding (Fig. 3). Table 2 summarized some selected geometric parameters for thiazolidinone 6.
Table 1

The crystal and experimental data of thiazolidinone 6

Parameters
Empirical formulaC16H18N2O3S
Formula weight318.38
Temperature100 °K
Wave length0.71073 Å
Crystal systemTriclinic,
space groupP-1
Unit cell dimensionsa = 5.6502 (6) Å
b = 9.1968 (9) Å
c = 14.9469 (16) Å
α = 98.992 (5)°
β = 91.848 (7)°
γ = 96.184 (5)°
Volume761.73 (14) Å3
Z2
Calculated density1.388 Mg m−3
Absorption coefficient0.23 mm−1
F(000)336
Crystal size0.47 × 0.26 × 0.14 mm
Theta range for data collection1.4° to 30.7°
Limiting indices− 8 ≤h ≤ 8, − 11 ≤k ≤ 13, − 21 ≤l ≤ 21
Reflections collected/unique16,661/4622 [R(int) = 0.045]
Completeness to theta30.7°–98.1%
Absorption correctionSemi-empirical from equivalents
Max. and min. transmission0.7318 and 0.7106
Refinement methodFull-matrix least-squares on F-2
Data/restraints/parameters4622/0/203
Goodness-of-fit on F-21.04
Final R indices [I > 2sigma(I)]R1 = 0.0344, wR2 = 0.088
R indices (all data)R1 = 0.0446, wR2 = 0.092
Largest diff. peak and hole0.45 and − 0.32 e.Å−3
Fig. 3

Molecular packing of the thiazolidinone 6

Table 2

Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for thiazolidinone 6

S1—C11.7461 (11)N1—C11.3854 (14)
S1—C21.7634 (11)N1—C31.4115 (14)
O1—C31.2261 (13)N1—C111.4364 (13)
O2—C51.2219 (13)N2—C81.3300 (14)
O3—C51.3560 (13)N2—C91.4543 (15)
O3—C61.4535 (14)N2—C101.4539 (15)
C1—S1—C291.59 (5)S1—C2—C8129.00 (8)
C5—O3—C6114.88 (8)O1—C3—N1122.06 (9)
C1—N1—C3116.76 (9)O1—C3—C2128.67 (10)
C1—N1—C11122.46 (9)N1—C3—C2109.27 (9)
C3—N1—C11120.76 (8)O2—C5—O3122.19 (10)
C8—N2—C9122.19 (9)O2—C5—C4125.53 (10)
C8—N2—C10121.08 (9)O3—C5—C4112.28 (9)
C9—N2—C10116.31 (9)O3—C6—C7107.39 (9)
S1—C1—N1110.58 (8)N2—C8—C2130.35 (10)
S1—C1—C4124.14 (8)N1—C11—C12120.10 (9)
N1—C1—C4125.27 (10)N1—C11—C16118.75 (9)
S1—C2—C3111.73 (8)
The crystal and experimental data of thiazolidinone 6 Molecular packing of the thiazolidinone 6 Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for thiazolidinone 6

Geometry optimization

The optimized molecular geometry of thiazolidinone 6 is shown in Fig. 4. Table 3 listed the hydrogen bonding data for thiazolidinone 6, and the results of the calculated bond distances and angles are given in Table 4. It is clear that the calculated bond distances and angles agree very well with the experimental results. The bond distances and angles deviated only by 0.027 Å (C20–N7) and 1.6° (C20–C6–S1). The correlation coefficients given in the same table indicated the good agreement between the calculated structure and the X-ray results. Interestingly, the thiazole and phenyl ring planes are not coplanar and are twisted from one another by an angle of 77.1° (exp. 66.5°).
Fig. 4

The optimized structure of thiazolidinone 6

Table 3

Hydrogen bonding data for thiazolidinone 6

D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C8—H8···O10.952.532.8888 (13)102
C9—H9A···S10.982.773.1190 (12)102
C9—H9B···O2i0.982.333.3018 (15)171
C12—H12···O1ii0.952.373.3042 (14)168

Symmetry codes: (i) − x + 1, − y + 1, − z + 1; (ii) x − 1, y, z

Table 4

The experimental and calculated geometric parameters of thiazolidinone 6

Bond distancesCalc.X-rayBond anglesCalc.X-ray
R(1–4)1.7731.746A(4-1-6)91.091.6
R(1–6)1.7861.763A(1-4-3)111.0110.6
R(2–9)1.2231.226A(1-4-10)123.9124.1
R(3–4)1.3871.385A(1-6-9)111.6111.7
R(3–9)1.4171.412A(1-6-20)131.0129.0
R(3–30)1.4351.436A(2-9-3)122.8122.1
R(4–10)1.3621.361A(2-9-6)127.8128.7
R(5–12)1.2271.222A(4-3-9)116.9116.8
R(6–9)1.4631.444A(4-3-30)122.8122.5
R(6–20)1.3631.369A(3-4-10)125.2125.3
R(7–20)1.3571.330A(9-3-30)120.2120.8
R(7–22)1.4561.454A(3-9-6)109.5109.3
R(7–26)1.4561.454A(3-30-31)119.9120.1
R(8–12)1.3601.356A(3-30-39)119.6118.7
R(8–13)1.4411.453A(4-10-12)121.0119.8
R(10–12)1.4481.444A(5-12-8)122.6122.2
R(13–16)1.5171.506A(5-12-10)125.7125.5
R(30–31)1.3971.391A(9-6-20)117.4119.2
R(30–39)1.3961.388A(6-20-7)132.2130.3
R(31–33)1.3941.391A(20-7-22)123.4122.2
R(33–35)1.3961.389A(20-7-26)119.3121.1
R(35–37)1.3961.390A(22-7-26)115.6116.3
R(37–39)1.3941.390A(7-22-23)110.6109.5
A(7-22-24)108.9109.5
A(12-8-13)115.6114.9
A(8-12-10)111.8112.3
A(8-13-16)107.4107.4
A(11-10-12)118.8120.1
A(31-30-39)120.5121.2
A(30-31-33)119.6118.9
A(30-39-37)119.6119.4
A(32-31-33)120.8120.6
A(31-33-35)120.1120.5
A(33-35-37)119.9120.0
A(35-37-39)120.2120.1
R20.99790.9936

R2: correlation coefficient

The optimized structure of thiazolidinone 6 Hydrogen bonding data for thiazolidinone 6 Symmetry codes: (i) − x + 1, − y + 1, − z + 1; (ii) x − 1, y, z The experimental and calculated geometric parameters of thiazolidinone 6 R2: correlation coefficient

Charge population analysis

The natural population analysis is performed to predict the natural charges (NC) at the different atomic sites (Fig. 5). It is clear that the sulfur atom is electropositive. The C9 and C12 are the most electropositive C-atoms as these atomic sites are bonded to two strong electronegative atoms. In contrast, the O and N-atoms have electronegative nature where the ring N-atom (N3) is more electronegative than the imine one (N7). Among the O-atoms in the studied molecule, the carbonyl O-atoms are the most electronegative where the O-atom (O5) from the carbonyl group in the ester moiety is more negative than that of the cyclic ketone (O2). As revealed from the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) map shown in Fig. 6, the most negative regions are located over the O-atoms while the positive region is mainly located over the protons of the two methyl groups.
Fig. 5

The natural charges at the different atomic sites of thiazolidinone 6

Fig. 6

The MEP figure of thiazolidinone 6

The natural charges at the different atomic sites of thiazolidinone 6 The MEP figure of thiazolidinone 6

Frontier molecular orbitals

The HOMO and LUMO levels of the thiazolidinone 6 are shown in Fig. 7. The HOMO and LUMO energies are − 5.0584 and − 0.9870 eV, respectively. As a result, the HOMO–LUMO energy gap is calculated to be 4.0714 eV. The HOMO and LUMO are mainly localized over the thiazole and phenyl rings, respectively. Since the HOMO and LUMO levels are mainly located over the π-system of the studied compound 6 so the HOMO–LUMO intramolecular charge transfer is mainly a π–π* transition.
Fig. 7

The frontier molecular orbitals calculated at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level

The frontier molecular orbitals calculated at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level

NMR spectra

The Gauge-independent atomic orbital (GIAO) calculations were used for accurate prediction of the 1H and 13C isotropic chemical shifts (C.S). The isotropic chemical shifts were used for the identification of organic compounds. The theoretical and experimental chemical shifts are presented in Table 5. Correlation graphs between the experimental and theoretical NMR chemical shifts are shown in Fig. 8. The correlations equations shown in this figure have high R2 values (0.974–0.983) indicating the good agreement between the theoretical and experimental data. The 1H-chemical shifts of the aromatic ring usually appear in the region of 7–8 ppm. In the present case, the aromatic protons were detected at 7.46–7.96 ppm which is in good agreement with B3LYP theoretical values (7.60–7.89 ppm). The aliphatic protons have lower chemical shifts than the aromatic ones (Table 5).
Table 5

The calculated and experimental 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of thiazolidinone 6

AtomC. Scalc.C. Sexp.AtomC. Scalc.C. Sexp.
C4149.2166.9H114.945.23
C684.591.2H144.254.19
C9152.6167.5H154.294.21
C1075.367.5H171.411.23
C12153.7177.4H181.231.24
C1352.760.9H191.421.26
C166.914.3H217.447.24
C20130.5162.4H233.782.90
C2229.736.4H242.752.92
C2637.837.4H253.462.93
C30126.2154.2H273.132.83
C31116.8130.9H283.452.84
C33117.1127.3H293.192.86
C35116.7137.5H327.617.53
C37117.3129.7H347.897.52
C39117.6114.8H367.887.46
H387.917.50
H407.607.96
Fig. 8

Correlation graphs between the calculated and experimental 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts

The calculated and experimental 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts of thiazolidinone 6 Correlation graphs between the calculated and experimental 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts The chemical shifts of the aromatic carbons usually appear in the overlapped region of the spectrum between 100 and 200 ppm [20]. The atom C30 has higher chemical shift than the other aromatic carbons (Table 5). The high chemical shift of C30 is due to the deshielding effect of the electronegative N-atom. Since the oxygen and nitrogen atoms are more electronegative than carbons so the C-atoms (C4, C9, C12, and C20) attached to these electronegative sites were detected at high chemical shifts (162.4–177.4 ppm) compared to the rest of C-atoms.

Cytotoxic activity

The anti-cancer activity of the thiazolidine derivatives 5 and 6 was determined against the colon carcinoma (HCT-116) cell line in comparison with the anticancer drug vinblastine, using MTT assay [21]. The results of the cytotoxic activity were expressed as the mean IC50 of three independent experiments (Table 6). The results revealed that thiazolidinone derivatives 5 and 6 had moderate anticancer activity against colon carcinoma (HCT-116).
Table 6

Viability values and IC50 of thiazolidinone derivatives 5 and 6 against HCT-116 Cell Line

S. NoSample concentration (μg/mL) viability %
502512.56.253.1251.560IC50 (μg)
Vinblastine23.0827.3543.5953.8569.2382.541009.8
542.5176.8284.1993.7298.5610010044.5
639.4358.1579.5186.4292.6396.4710035.9
Viability values and IC50 of thiazolidinone derivatives 5 and 6 against HCT-116 Cell Line

Experimental section

General

All the melting points were measured on a Gallenkamp apparatus in open glass capillaries and are uncorrected. The IR Spectra were recorded using Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrophotometer. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL ECP 500 NMR spectrometer operating at 500 MHz. 1H spectra were run at 500 MHz and 13C spectra were run at 125 MHz in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3). Chemical shifts were related to that of the solvent. Chemical shifts δ are expressed in ppm units. Elemental analysis were carried out on a 2400 CHN Elemental Analyzer. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements were accomplished on a Bruker SMART APEX II CCD diffractometer. The biological evaluations of the products were carried out in the Medical Mycology Laboratory of the Regional Center for Mycology and Biotechnology of Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. The thiazolidinone derivative 5 was prepared as described in the literature [15].

Synthesis of (Z)-ethyl 2-((Z)-5-((dimethylamino)methylene)- 4-oxo-3-phenylthiazolidin- 2-ylidene)acetate (6)

A mixture of thiazolidinone 5 (3.05 g, 10 mmol) and DMF-DMA (1.19 g, 1.33 mL, 10 mmol) in DMF (3 mL) was heated under reflux for 3 h, then left to cool to room temperature. The precipitated solid was filtered off, washed with EtOH and recrystallized from DMF to afford the thiazolidinone derivative 6 in 20% yield, m.p. 227 °C; IR (KBr) v max 1715 (C=O), 1639 (C=O) cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.24 (t, 3H. CH3, J = 7.5 Hz), 2.83 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.91 (s, 3H, CH3), 4.20 (q, 2H, CH2, J = 7.5 Hz), 5.23 (s, 1H, CH), 7.24 (s, 1H, CH), 7.38–7.96 (m, 5H, Ar–H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.3 (CH3), 36.4, 37.4 (2CH3), 60.9 (CH2), 67.5, 91.2, 114.8, 127.3, 129.7, 130.9, 137.5, 154.2, 162.4, 166.9, 167.5 (C=O), 177.4 (C=O); MS, m/z (%) 304 (95), 258 (55), 243 (100), 215 (25), 77 (Ph, 18). calcd. for C16H18N2O3S: C, 60.36; H, 5.70; N, 8.80. Found: C, 60.28; H, 5.66; N, 8.85.

X-ray analysis

The thiazolidinone 6 was obtained as single crystals by slow evaporation from DMF solution of the pure compound at room temperature. The crystallographic data for thiazolidinone 6 (CCDC 1551169) can be obtained on request from the director, Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Computational details

The X-ray structure coordinates of thiazolidinone 6 were used for geometry optimization followed by frequency calculations. For this task, we used Gaussian 03 software [22] and B3LYP/6‒31G(d,p) method. All the obtained frequencies are positive and no imaginary modes were detected. GaussView4.1 [23] and Chemcraft [24] programs have been used to extract the calculation results and to visualize the optimized structures. The cytotoxic activity of the synthesized compounds was carried out at the Regional Center for Mycology and Biotechnology at Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt according to the reported method [21].

Conclusions

A novel synthesis and DFT studies of (Z)-ethyl 2-((Z)-5-((dimethylamino) methylene)-4-oxo-3-phenylthiazolidin-2-ylidene)acetate are presented. The NMR chemical shifts were described based on the GIAO calculations. The calculated results showed good correlations with the experimental data. The anticancer activity of the synthesized compounds against the colon carcinoma (HCT-116) cell line was tested and showed moderate activity.
  15 in total

1.  Synthesis, binding affinity and selectivity of new beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptor blockers.

Authors:  V Brizzi; M Francioli; M Brufani; L Filocamo; G Bruni; P Massarelli
Journal:  Farmaco       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  The mechanisms of action of commonly used antiepileptic drugs.

Authors:  P Kwan; G J Sills; M J Brodie
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  Actithiazic acid. II. Isolation and characterization.

Authors:  J R SCHENCK; A F DE ROSE
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1952-10       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 4.  Opportunities and challenges in antiparasitic drug discovery.

Authors:  Richard Pink; Alan Hudson; Marie-Annick Mouriès; Mary Bendig
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 5.  Targeted anti-mitotic therapies: can we improve on tubulin agents?

Authors:  Jeffrey R Jackson; Denis R Patrick; Mohammed M Dar; Pearl S Huang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of novel 2-thiazolylimino-5-arylidene-4-thiazolidinones.

Authors:  Paola Vicini; Athina Geronikaki; Kitka Anastasia; Matteo Incerti; Franca Zani
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  The synthesis of 2,3-disubstituted-4-thiazolidones.

Authors:  H D TROUTMAN; L M LONG
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1948-10       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Endothelial dysfunction and arterial pressure regulation during early diabetes in mice: roles for nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor.

Authors:  Sharyn M Fitzgerald; Barbara K Kemp-Harper; Helena C Parkington; Geoffrey A Head; Roger G Evans
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Novel inhibitors of an emerging target in Mycobacterium tuberculosis; substituted thiazolidinones as inhibitors of dTDP-rhamnose synthesis.

Authors:  Kerim Babaoglu; Mark A Page; Victoria C Jones; Michael R McNeil; Changjiang Dong; James H Naismith; Richard E Lee
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.