| Literature DB >> 31382992 |
Kotaro Ogawa1,2, Tatsusada Okuno2, Kazuyoshi Hosomichi3, Akiko Hosokawa2,4, Jun Hirata1,5, Ken Suzuki1, Saori Sakaue1, Makoto Kinoshita2, Yoshihiro Asano6, Katsuichi Miyamoto7, Ituro Inoue8, Susumu Kusunoki7, Yukinori Okada9,10, Hideki Mochizuki2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The spectrum of classical and non-classical HLA genes related to the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in the Japanese population has not been studied in detail. We conducted a case-control analysis of classical and non-classical HLA genes.Entities:
Keywords: HLA; Multiple sclerosis; Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; Next-generation sequencing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31382992 PMCID: PMC6683481 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-019-1551-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Clinical features of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients
| MS ( | NMOSD ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Sex (male/female) | 10/35 | 7/24 |
| Age (years) | 43.6 (20–65) | 52.7 (17–82) |
| Age at onset (years) | 34.3 (5–58) | 47.4 (15–81) |
| Disease duration (years) | 9.3 (1–38) | 5.3 (0–18) |
| EDSS | 3.1 (0–8) | 4.6 (0–9) |
| IgG index | 0.73 ( | 0.57 ( |
| Oligo clonal band | 21/38 | – |
| Anti-AQP4 antibody | – | 29/31 |
HLA association analysis of multiple sclerosis in the Japanese population
| Variant | Frequency | Nominal analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLA gene | MS ( | Control ( | OR (95% CI) |
| Fisher |
| HLA-B*15:01 | 0.200 | 0.078 | 2.95 (1.66–5.24) | 2.2 × 10−4 | |
| HLA-B*39:01 | 0.122 | 0.043 | 3.09 (1.52–6.29) | 0.0019 | |
| HLA-B*52:01 | 0.044 | 0.127 | 0.32 (0.08–0.88) | 0.017 | * |
| HLA-C*07:02 | 0.233 | 0.145 | 1.80 (1.07–3.04) | 0.028 | |
| HLA-C*12:02 | 0.044 | 0.127 | 0.32 (0.08–0.88) | 0.017 | * |
| HLA-DMB*01:07 | 0.044 | 0.008 | 5.64 (1.19–22.7) | 0.015 | * |
| HLA-DOA*01:01 | 0.978 | 0.997 | 0.15 (0.03–0.94) | 0.042 | |
| HLA-DPB1*05:01 | 0.522 | 0.356 | 1.98 (1.28–3.07) | 0.0021 | |
| HLA-DQA1*01:02 | 0.267 | 0.156 | 1.96 (1.19–3.25) | 0.0084 | |
| HLA-DQA1*03:03 | 0.222 | 0.141 | 1.74 (1.02–2.96) | 0.042 | |
| HLA-DQB1*03:01 | 0.033 | 0.104 | 0.30 (0.06–0.93) | 0.037 | * |
| HLA-DQB1*04:01 | 0.222 | 0.100 | 2.56 (1.49–4.42) | 7.0 × 10−4 | |
| HLA-DQB1*06:02 | 0.200 | 0.068 | 3.45 (1.93–6.17) | 3.0 × 10−5 | |
| HLA-DRA*01:01 | 0.733 | 0.579 | 2.00 (1.23–3.25) | 0.0053 | |
| HLA-DRA*01:02 | 0.267 | 0.421 | 0.50 (0.31–0.81) | 0.0053 | |
| HLA-DRB1*04:05 | 0.233 | 0.120 | 2.23 (1.31–3.79) | 0.0030 | |
| HLA-DRB1*15:01 | 0.211 | 0.072 | 3.44 (1.95–6.07) | 2.1 × 10−5 | |
| HLA-DRB1*15:02 | 0.033 | 0.120 | 0.25 (0.05–0.79) | 0.012 | * |
*Fisher’s exact test was used for association analysis, otherwise logistic regression was used
HLA conditional analysis of multiple sclerosis in the Japanese population
| Variant | Frequency | Conditional association | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRB1*15:01, DRB1*04:05, B*39:01, and B*15:01 | ||||
| HLA gene | MS ( | Control ( | OR (95% CI) |
|
| HLA-DRB1*15:01 | 0.211 | 0.072 | 4.06 (2.22–7.45) | 5.7 × 10−6 |
| HLA-DRB1*04:05 | 0.233 | 0.120 | 3.02 (1.72–5.31) | 1.2 × 10−4 |
| HLA-B*39:01 | 0.122 | 0.043 | 4.13 (1.96–8.71) | 1.9 × 10− 4 |
| HLA-B*15:01 | 0.200 | 0.078 | 3.10 (1.70–5.65) | 2.3 × 10−4 |
HLA association analysis with the clinical course of MS
| Number of patients | EDSS | ||
| A | |||
| HLA-DRB1*15:01 positive | 18 | 3.08 | 0.990 |
| HLA-DRB1*15:01 negative | 27 | 3.09 | |
| HLA-DQB1*06:02 positive | 17 | 3.41 | 0.472 |
| HLA-DQB1*06:02 negative | 28 | 2.89 | |
| HLA-B*15:01 positive | 15 | 4.20 | 0.098 |
| HLA-B*15:01 negative | 30 | 2.53 | |
| HLA-B*39:01 positive | 11 | 3.50 | 0.504 |
| HLA-B*39:01 negative | 34 | 2.96 | |
| Number of patients | Age of onset | ||
| B | |||
| HLA-DRB1*15:01 positive | 18 | 33.3 | 0.618 |
| HLA-DRB1*15:01 negative | 27 | 35.0 | |
| HLA-DQB1*06:02 positive | 17 | 33.0 | 0.545 |
| HLA-DQB1*06:02 negative | 28 | 35.1 | |
| HLA-B*15:01 positive | 15 | 35.1 | 0.752 |
| HLA-B*15:01 negative | 30 | 33.9 | |
| HLA-B*39:01 positive | 11 | 30.0 | 0.142 |
| HLA-B*39:01 negative | 34 | 35.7 | |
*Student’s t test was used for association analysis
Fig. 1Multiple sclerosis risk-associated amino acid positions of the HLA genes in three-dimensional structure models. HLA amino acid positions with significant MS risk in HLA-DQ molecules. The protein structure is based on Protein Data Bank (PDB) entries 1jk8 and prepared using UCSF Chimera (version 1.7). Residues at the amino acid positions with significant MS risk is highlighted in red
Fig. 2Multiple sclerosis risk-associated amino acid positions of the HLA genes. Diamonds represent the –log10(P) of the amino acid positions of the tested HLA genes. Labeled red diamonds represent the –log10(P) values of the amino acid positions significantly associated with MS. The horizontal lines represent the association P value of HLA-DRB1*15:01. a No amino acid polymorphisms of HLA-B was significantly associated with MS. b No amino acid polymorphisms of HLA-DRB1 is significantly associated with MS. c The HLA-DQβ1 position 9 and 70 were associated with MS more significantly than HLA-DRB1*15:01
HLA association analysis of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in the Japanese population
| Variant | Frequency | Nominal analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLA gene | NMOSD ( | Control ( | OR (95% CI) |
| Fisher |
| HLA-A*26:03 | 0.065 | 0.020 | 3.40 (0.81–10.9) | 0.047 | * |
| HLA-B*07:02 | 0.129 | 0.059 | 2.34 (1.06–5.19) | 0.036 | |
| HLA-DPB1*05:01 | 0.516 | 0.356 | 1.93 (1.15–3.24) | 0.012 | |
| HLA-DQA1*01:01 | 0.129 | 0.058 | 2.39 (1.08–5.30) | 0.031 | |
| HLA-DQA1*03:02 | 0.048 | 0.147 | 0.30 (0.06–0.93) | 0.035 | * |
| HLA-DQA1*05:03 | 0.097 | 0.015 | 6.96 (2.55–19.0) | 1.5 × 10−4 | |
| HLA-DQB1*03:01 | 0.210 | 0.104 | 2.29 (1.20–4.39) | 0.012 | |
| HLA-DQB1*03:03 | 0.048 | 0.149 | 0.29 (0.06–0.91) | 0.024 | * |
| HLA-DRB1*01:01 | 0.129 | 0.058 | 2.39 (1.08–5.30) | 0.031 | |
| HLA-DRB1*09:01 | 0.016 | 0.135 | 0.10 (0.003–0.62) | 0.0027 | * |
| HLA-DRB1*14:06 | 0.081 | 0.012 | 7.40 (1.92–24.8) | 0.0021 | * |
*Fisher’s exact test was used for association analysis, otherwise, logistic regression was used