| Literature DB >> 31381766 |
Allison N Bucsan1,2, Smriti Mehra2, Shabaana A Khader3, Deepak Kaushal1,2,4,5.
Abstract
Animal models are important in understanding both the pathogenesis of and immunity to tuberculosis (TB). Unfortunately, we are beginning to understand that no animal model perfectly recapitulates the human TB syndrome, which encompasses numerous different stages. Furthermore, Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is a very heterogeneous event at both the levels of pathogenesis and immunity. This review seeks to establish the current understanding of TB pathogenesis and immunity, as validated in the animal models of TB in active use today. We especially focus on the use of modern genomic approaches in these models to determine the mechanism and the role of specific molecular pathways. Animal models have significantly enhanced our understanding of TB. Incorporation of contemporary technologies such as single cell transcriptomics, high-parameter flow cytometric immune profiling, proteomics, proteomic flow cytometry and immunocytometry into the animal models in use will further enhance our understanding of TB and facilitate the development of treatment and vaccination strategies. © FEMS 2019.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Mycobacterium tuberculosiszzm321990 ; animal models; translation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31381766 PMCID: PMC6687098 DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftz037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathog Dis ISSN: 2049-632X Impact factor: 3.166
Figure 1Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is spread via aerosols and is harbored primarily in the lungs. When macrophages encounter and engulf the pathogens, it may be eliminated or may persist due to compensatory mechanisms. During the innate immune phase, macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells are recruited to the site of infection. After severeal week, T and B cells migrate to the site of infection and form granulomas that encapsulate the innate immune cells and bacilli in a fibrotic capsule that creates a gradient of hypoxia. If the immune cells are not able to kill the bacilli and prevent its growth, granulomas caseate and Mtbbacilli disseminate to other organs including the spleen, liver and brain.
Comparison of biosafety safety level 2 (BSL-2) and BSL-3 animal models of Mtbinfection.
| Non-human primates | Mouse | Rabbit | Guinea pig | Rat | Zebrafish | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susceptible to human clinical strains of | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Potential for PK studies | Yes, but significant cost | No, differs from humans | Yes | No, differs from humans | Yes | No |
| BSL-2 model | No | No | No | No | No | Yes |
| BSL-3 model | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Easy to house | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Pulmonary pathology | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Caseous pathology | Yes | No, except C3HeB/FeJ mouse | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cavitary lesions | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Dissemination | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Latency | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
| Ready availability of immunological reagents | Yes, human cross-reactivity | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| CD1-cross reactivity | CD1a, CD1b, CD1c, CD1d | CD1d only | CD1a, CD1b, CD1d | CD1b, CD1c | CD1d only | No |