Literature DB >> 31379215

Quantifying phonological knowledge in children with phonological disorder.

Philip N Combiths1, Jessica A Barlow2, Emilie Sanchez3.   

Abstract

Generative phonologists use contrastive minimal pairs to determine functional phonological units in a language. This technique has been extended for clinical purposes to derive phonemic inventories for children with phonological disorder, providing a qualitative analysis of a given child's phonological system that is useful for assessment, treatment, and progress monitoring. In this study, we examine the single-word productions of 275 children with phonological disorder from the Learnability Project (Gierut, 2015b) to confirm the relationship between phonemic inventory - a measure of phonological knowledge - and consonant accuracy - a quantitative, relational measure that directly compares a child's phonological productions to the target (i.e. adult-like) form. Further, we identify potential percentage accuracy cutoff scores that reliably classify sounds as in or out of a child's phonemic inventory in speech-sound probes of varying length. Our findings indicate that the phonemic function of up to 90% of English consonants can be identified from percentage accuracy for preschool-age children with phonological disorder when a sufficiently large and thorough speech sample is used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Phonology; accuracy; assessment; phonemic inventory; phonological disorder

Year:  2019        PMID: 31379215      PMCID: PMC6756935          DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1584247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  24 in total

Review 1.  Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests.

Authors:  M Greiner; D Pfeiffer; R D Smith
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 2.  Prevalence and natural history of primary speech and language delay: findings from a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  J Law; J Boyle; F Harris; A Harkness; C Nye
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Minimal pair approaches to phonological remediation.

Authors:  Jessica A Barlow; Judith A Gierut
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.761

4.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  A 28-year follow-up of adults with a history of moderate phonological disorder: linguistic and personality results.

Authors:  S Felsenfeld; P A Broen; M McGue
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-10

6.  Strategies for graphical threshold determination.

Authors:  J Vermont; J L Bosson; P François; C Robert; A Rueff; J Demongeot
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  On the anatomy of a chain shift.

Authors:  Daniel A Dinnsen; Christopher R Green; Judith A Gierut; Michele L Morrisette
Journal:  J Linguist       Date:  2011-07-01

9.  What influences literacy outcome in children with speech sound disorder?

Authors:  Robin L Peterson; Bruce F Pennington; Lawrence D Shriberg; Richard Boada
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  The conditions and course of clinically induced phonological change.

Authors:  J A Gierut
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.