| Literature DB >> 31379115 |
Shengchuan Cao1,2,3,4, Yiying Sun1,2,3,4, Wenjun Wang1,2,3,4, Bailu Wang5, Qun Zhang1,2,3,4, Chang Pan1,2,3,4, Qiuhuan Yuan1,2,3,4, Feng Xu1,2,3,4, Shujian Wei1,2,3,4, Yuguo Chen1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury attenuates the beneficial effects of reperfusion therapy. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is overactivated during myocardial I/R injury. Mitophagy plays a critical role in the development of myocardial I/R injury. However, the effect of PARP activation on mitophagy in cardiomyocytes is unknown. In this study, we found that I/R induced PARP activation and mitophagy in mouse hearts. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition reduced the infarct size and suppressed mitophagy after myocardial I/R injury. In vitro, hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) activated PARP, promoted mitophagy and induced cell apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition suppressed H/R-induced mitophagy and cell apoptosis. Parkin knockdown with lentivirus vectors inhibited mitophagy and prevented cell apoptosis in H/R-treated cells. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition prevented the loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). Cyclosporin A maintained ΔΨm and suppressed mitophagy but FCCP reduced the effect of PARP inhibition on ΔΨm and promoted mitophagy, indicating the critical role of ΔΨm in H/R-induced mitophagy. Furthermore, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and poly(ADP-ribosylation) of CypD and TSPO might contribute to the regulation of ΔΨm by PARP. Our findings thus suggest that PARP inhibition protects against I/R-induced cell apoptosis by suppressing excessive mitophagy via the ΔΨm/Parkin pathway.Entities:
Keywords: cell apoptosis; mitochondrial membrane potential; mitophagy; poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; poly-ADP-ribosylation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31379115 PMCID: PMC6787458 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14573
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1I/R‐induced myocardial injury and mitophagy were attenuated by PARP inhibition. A, Protein expression of PAR indicated by Western blotting. (n = 5). B, TTC staining of heart sections and quantification analysis of the infarct size. (n = 6). C, Cardiac function was determined via echocardiography and indicated by LVEF at the end of the 24‐hour reperfusion. (n = 6). D and E, TUNEL staining showing apoptotic cells in the area at risk after I/R and quantification analysis. (n = 6). F, Electron microscopy showing the structure of mitochondria in the area at risk. (n = 5). Scale bar: 1 μm. G, The average area of individual mitochondria. H, The number of mitochondria per 10 μm2 of the cytoplasm. I, Autophagic vacuoles (arrowheads) normalized by the cytoplasmic surface area (per μm2). *P < .01 vs sham group, **P < .05 vs sham group, # P < .05 vs I/R group
Figure 2PARP inhibition suppressed H/R‐induced cell apoptosis and mitophagy. A and B, Representative blots of PAR and quantification analysis. (n = 3). C and D, Apoptotic cells were indicated by TUNEL staining (red), and the percentages of apoptotic cells were calculated. (n = 5). Scale bar: 20 μm. E, Autophagic vacuoles were visualized by an electron microscope. Scale bar: 0.5 μm. F, Representative Western blots of Parkin and COX IV from whole cells. (n = 3). G, Proteins from isolated mitochondria were immunoblotted for Parkin and COX IV. (n = 3). *P < .01 vs control, # P < .01 vs H/R group, ## P < .05 vs H/R group
Figure 3Mitophagy promoted cell apoptosis. A, H9C2 cells were transfected with lentiviruses and photographed with a fluorescence microscope. B, Western blotting indicating the efficacy of Lv‐Parkin‐siRNA. C, Autophagic vacuoles were observed by an electron microscope. Scale bar: 0.5 μm. D, Expression of Parkin and COX IV via immunoblotting of whole cells. (n = 3). E, Proteins from isolated mitochondria were immunoblotted for Parkin and COX IV. (n = 3). F and G, TUNEL staining showing apoptotic cells and quantification analysis. (n = 5). Scale bar: 20 μm. *P < .01 vs control, # P < .05 vs H/R group, & P < .05 vs Lv‐NC + H/R group
Figure 4ΔΨm mediated the effect of PARP on mitophagy. A, ΔΨm was determined by JC‐1 staining. Scale bar: 20 μm. B, C, and F, The relative ΔΨm was quantitatively analysed. (n = 5). D and G, Total proteins were immunoblotted for Parkin and COX IV. (n = 3). E and H, Proteins from isolated mitochondria were immunoblotted for Parkin and COX IV. (n = 3). *P < .01 vs control, # P < .05 vs H/R group, & P < .01 vs DPQ + H/R group
Figure 5ROS participated in the disruptive effect of PARP on ΔΨm. A and B, The levels of ROS were determined with DCF, and the relative mean DCF fluorescence was expressed compared with the control. (n = 5). C and D, ΔΨm was determined by JC‐1 and quantification analysis. (n = 5). *P < .01 vs control, # P < .05 vs H/R group
Figure 6Mitochondrial CypD and TSPO were modified by poly(ADP‐ribosylation). A, Proteins from isolated mitochondria were immunoblotted for Parkin and COX IV. (n = 3). B, Immunoprecipitation using a PAR antibody showed that CypD was modified by poly(ADP‐ribosylation). (n = 5). C, Immunoprecipitation using a PAR antibody showed that TSPO was modified by poly(ADP‐ribosylation). (n = 5)