Kohei Shigeta1,2, Meenal Datta1, Tai Hato1,3, Shuji Kitahara1,4, Ivy X Chen1, Aya Matsui1, Hiroto Kikuchi1, Emilie Mamessier1,5, Shuichi Aoki1,6, Rakesh R Ramjiawan1,7, Hiroki Ochiai1,8, Nabeel Bardeesy9, Peigen Huang1, Mark Cobbold9, Andrew X Zhu9, Rakesh K Jain1, Dan G Duda1. 1. Edwin. L. Steele Laboratories for Tumor Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. 2. Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan. 4. Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. 5. Department of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Research Center, Marseille, France. 6. Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan. 7. Angiogenesis Laboratory, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 9. Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Activation of the antitumor immune response using programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) blockade showed benefit only in a fraction of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Combining PD-1 blockade with antiangiogenesis has shown promise in substantially increasing the fraction of patients with HCC who respond to treatment, but the mechanism of this interaction is unknown. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We recapitulated these clinical outcomes using orthotopic-grafted or induced-murine models of HCC. Specific blockade of vascular endothelial receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) using a murine antibody significantly delayed primary tumor growth but failed to prolong survival, while anti-PD-1 antibody treatment alone conferred a minor survival advantage in one model. However, dual anti-PD-1/VEGFR-2 therapy significantly inhibited primary tumor growth and doubled survival in both models. Combination therapy reprogrammed the immune microenvironment by increasing cluster of differentiation 8-positive (CD8+ ) cytotoxic T cell infiltration and activation, shifting the M1/M2 ratio of tumor-associated macrophages and reducing T regulatory cell (Treg) and chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2-positive monocyte infiltration in HCC tissue. In these models, VEGFR-2 was selectively expressed in tumor endothelial cells. Using spheroid cultures of HCC tissue, we found that PD-ligand 1 expression in HCC cells was induced in a paracrine manner upon anti-VEGFR-2 blockade in endothelial cells in part through interferon-gamma expression. Moreover, we found that VEGFR-2 blockade increased PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating CD4+ cells. We also found that under anti-PD-1 therapy, CD4+ cells promote normalized vessel formation in the face of antiangiogenic therapy with anti-VEGFR-2 antibody. CONCLUSIONS: We show that dual anti-PD-1/VEGFR-2 therapy has a durable vessel fortification effect in HCC and can overcome treatment resistance to either treatment alone and increase overall survival in both anti-PD-1 therapy-resistant and anti-PD-1 therapy-responsive HCC models.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Activation of the antitumor immune response using programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) blockade showed benefit only in a fraction of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Combining PD-1 blockade with antiangiogenesis has shown promise in substantially increasing the fraction of patients with HCC who respond to treatment, but the mechanism of this interaction is unknown. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We recapitulated these clinical outcomes using orthotopic-grafted or induced-murine models of HCC. Specific blockade of vascular endothelial receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) using a murine antibody significantly delayed primary tumor growth but failed to prolong survival, while anti-PD-1 antibody treatment alone conferred a minor survival advantage in one model. However, dual anti-PD-1/VEGFR-2 therapy significantly inhibited primary tumor growth and doubled survival in both models. Combination therapy reprogrammed the immune microenvironment by increasing cluster of differentiation 8-positive (CD8+ ) cytotoxic T cell infiltration and activation, shifting the M1/M2 ratio of tumor-associated macrophages and reducing T regulatory cell (Treg) and chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 2-positive monocyte infiltration in HCC tissue. In these models, VEGFR-2 was selectively expressed in tumor endothelial cells. Using spheroid cultures of HCC tissue, we found that PD-ligand 1 expression in HCC cells was induced in a paracrine manner upon anti-VEGFR-2 blockade in endothelial cells in part through interferon-gamma expression. Moreover, we found that VEGFR-2 blockade increased PD-1 expression in tumor-infiltrating CD4+ cells. We also found that under anti-PD-1 therapy, CD4+ cells promote normalized vessel formation in the face of antiangiogenic therapy with anti-VEGFR-2 antibody. CONCLUSIONS: We show that dual anti-PD-1/VEGFR-2 therapy has a durable vessel fortification effect in HCC and can overcome treatment resistance to either treatment alone and increase overall survival in both anti-PD-1 therapy-resistant and anti-PD-1 therapy-responsive HCC models.
Authors: Daniela Sia; Yang Jiao; Iris Martinez-Quetglas; Olga Kuchuk; Carlos Villacorta-Martin; Manuel Castro de Moura; Juan Putra; Genis Camprecios; Laia Bassaganyas; Nicholas Akers; Bojan Losic; Samuel Waxman; Swan N Thung; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Manel Esteller; Scott L Friedman; Myron Schwartz; Augusto Villanueva; Josep M Llovet Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Andrew Gabrielson; Yunan Wu; Hongkun Wang; Jiji Jiang; Bhaskar Kallakury; Zoran Gatalica; Sandeep Reddy; David Kleiner; Thomas Fishbein; Lynt Johnson; Eddie Island; Rohit Satoskar; Filip Banovac; Reena Jha; Jaydeep Kachhela; Perry Feng; Tiger Zhang; Anteneh Tesfaye; Petra Prins; Christopher Loffredo; John Marshall; Louis Weiner; Michael Atkins; Aiwu Ruth He Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Dawang Zhou; Claudius Conrad; Fan Xia; Ji-Sun Park; Bernhard Payer; Yi Yin; Gregory Y Lauwers; Wolfgang Thasler; Jeannie T Lee; Joseph Avruch; Nabeel Bardeesy Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2009-11-06 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Andrew X Zhu; Yoon-Koo Kang; Chia-Jui Yen; Richard S Finn; Peter R Galle; Josep M Llovet; Eric Assenat; Giovanni Brandi; Marc Pracht; Ho Yeong Lim; Kun-Ming Rau; Kenta Motomura; Izumi Ohno; Philippe Merle; Bruno Daniele; Dong Bok Shin; Guido Gerken; Christophe Borg; Jean-Baptiste Hiriart; Takuji Okusaka; Manabu Morimoto; Yanzhi Hsu; Paolo B Abada; Masatoshi Kudo Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Zowi R Huinen; Elisabeth J M Huijbers; Judy R van Beijnum; Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Arjan W Griffioen Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Abigail Allen; David Gau; Paul Francoeur; Jordan Sturm; Yue Wang; Ryan Martin; Jodi Maranchie; Anette Duensing; Adam Kaczorowski; Stefan Duensing; Lily Wu; Michael T Lotze; David Koes; Walter J Storkus; Partha Roy Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 5.157