Literature DB >> 31378549

Correlation Between Brain Tissue Damage and Inertial Cavitation Dose Quantified Using Passive Cavitation Imaging.

Shanshan Xu1, Dezhuang Ye2, Leighton Wan3, Yujia Shentu3, Yimei Yue3, Mingxi Wan4, Hong Chen5.   

Abstract

Focused ultrasound (FUS)-induced cavitation-mediated brain therapies have become emerging therapeutic modalities for neurologic diseases. Cavitation monitoring is essential to ensure the safety of all cavitation-mediated therapeutic techniques as inertial cavitation can be associated with tissue damage. The objective of this study was to reveal the correlation between the inertial cavitation dose, quantified by passive cavitation imaging (PCI), and brain tissue histologic-level damage induced by FUS in combination with microbubbles. An ultrasound image-guided FUS system consisting of a single-element FUS transducer (1.5 MHz) and a co-axially aligned 128-element linear ultrasound imaging array was used to perform FUS treatment of mice. Mice were sonicated by FUS with different peak negative pressures (0.5 MPa, 1.1 MPa, 4.0 MPa and 6.5 MPa) in the presence of systemically injected microbubbles. The acoustic emissions from the FUS-activated microbubbles were passively detected by the imaging array. The pre-beamformed channel data were acquired and processed offline using the frequency-domain delay, sum and integration algorithm to generate inertial cavitation maps. All the mice were sacrificed after the FUS treatment, and their brains were harvested and processed for hematoxylin and eosin staining. The obtained inertial cavitation maps revealed the dynamic changes of microbubble behaviors during FUS treatment at different pressure levels. It was found that the inertial cavitation dose quantified based on PCI had a linear correlation with the scale of histologic-level tissue damage. Findings from this study suggested that PCI can be used to predict histologic-level tissue damage associated with the FUS-induced cavitation.
Copyright © 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain therapies; Cavitation; Focused ultrasound; Passive cavitation imaging; Tissue damage

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31378549     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  8 in total

Review 1.  Towards controlled drug delivery in brain tumors with microbubble-enhanced focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Scott Schoen; M Sait Kilinc; Hohyun Lee; Yutong Guo; F Levent Degertekin; Graeme F Woodworth; Costas Arvanitis
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Characterization of focused ultrasound-mediated brainstem delivery of intranasally administered agents.

Authors:  Dezhuang Ye; Jingyi Luan; Hannah Pang; Yaoheng Yang; Arash Nazeri; Joshua B Rubin; Hong Chen
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Tri-modality cavitation mapping in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mucong Li; Georgy Sankin; Tri Vu; Junjie Yao; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of Overpressure on Acoustic Emissions and Treated Tissue Histology in ex Vivo Bulk Ultrasound Ablation.

Authors:  Chandra Priya Karunakaran; Mark T Burgess; Marepalli B Rao; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Ultrafast three-dimensional microbubble imaging in vivo predicts tissue damage volume distributions during nonthermal brain ablation.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Dallan McMahon; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 6.  Acoustic characterization of cavitation intensity: A review.

Authors:  Pengfei Wu; Xiuming Wang; Weijun Lin; Lixin Bai
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 7.491

7.  Non-invasive optogenetics with ultrasound-mediated gene delivery and red-light excitation.

Authors:  Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Maria F Murillo; Rebecca Lynn Noel; Alec J Batts; Robin Ji; Nancy Kwon; Han Yu; Chi-Kun Tong; Jennifer N Gelinas; Dion Khodagholy Araghy; S Abid Hussaini; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 9.184

8.  Blood-brain barrier opening in a large animal model using closed-loop microbubble cavitation-based feedback control of focused ultrasound sonication.

Authors:  Chih-Yen Chien; Lu Xu; Christopher Pham Pacia; Yimei Yue; Hong Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.