Jed A Diekfuss1, Dustin R Grooms2, Katharine S Nissen3, Daniel K Schneider4, Kim D Barber Foss3, Staci Thomas3, Scott Bonnette3, Jonathan A Dudley5, Weihong Yuan6, Danielle L Reddington3, Jonathan D Ellis7, James Leach8, Michael Gordon9, Craig Lindsey10, Ken Rushford9, Carlee Shafer10, Gregory D Myer11. 1. The SPORT Center, Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Electronic address: jed.diekfuss@cchmc.org. 2. Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute and Division of Athletic Training, School of Applied Health Sciences and Wellness, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA. 3. The SPORT Center, Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 4. The SPORT Center, Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. 5. Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio, USA. 6. Pediatric Neuroimaging Research Consortium, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio, USA; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 7. The SPORT Center, Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 8. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Division of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. 9. St Xavier High School, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 10. Moeller High School, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 11. The SPORT Center, Division of Sports Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Departments of Pediatrics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; The Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention, Waltham, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study's purpose was to utilize a prospective dataset to examine differences in functional brain connectivity in male high school athletes who suffered an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury relative to their non-injured peers. METHODS: Sixty-two male high school football players were evaluated using functional magnetic resonance imaging prior to their competitive season to evaluate resting-state functional brain connectivity. Three athletes later experienced an ACL injury and were matched to 12 teammates who did not go on to sustain an ACL injury (controls) based on school, age, height, weight, and year in school. Twenty-five knee-motor regions of interest (ROIs) were created to identify differences in connectivity between the two groups. Between-subject F and t tests were used to identify significant ROI differences using a false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: There was significantly less connectivity between the left secondary somatosensory cortex and the left supplementary motor area (p = 0.025), right pre-motor cortex (p = 0.026), right supplementary motor area (p = 0.026), left primary somatosensory cortex (superior division; p = 0.026), left primary somatosensory cortex (inferior division; p = 0.026), and left primary motor cortex (p = 0.048) for the ACL-injured compared to the control subjects. No other ROI-to-ROI comparisons were significantly different between the groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data indicate a potential sensorimotor disruption for male football players who go on to experience an ACL injury. Future studies with larger sample sizes and complementary measures of neuromuscular control are needed to support these findings.
OBJECTIVE: This study's purpose was to utilize a prospective dataset to examine differences in functional brain connectivity in male high school athletes who suffered an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury relative to their non-injured peers. METHODS: Sixty-two male high school football players were evaluated using functional magnetic resonance imaging prior to their competitive season to evaluate resting-state functional brain connectivity. Three athletes later experienced an ACL injury and were matched to 12 teammates who did not go on to sustain an ACL injury (controls) based on school, age, height, weight, and year in school. Twenty-five knee-motor regions of interest (ROIs) were created to identify differences in connectivity between the two groups. Between-subject F and t tests were used to identify significant ROI differences using a false discovery rate correction for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: There was significantly less connectivity between the left secondary somatosensory cortex and the left supplementary motor area (p = 0.025), right pre-motor cortex (p = 0.026), right supplementary motor area (p = 0.026), left primary somatosensory cortex (superior division; p = 0.026), left primary somatosensory cortex (inferior division; p = 0.026), and left primary motor cortex (p = 0.048) for the ACL-injured compared to the control subjects. No other ROI-to-ROI comparisons were significantly different between the groups (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our preliminary data indicate a potential sensorimotor disruption for male football players who go on to experience an ACL injury. Future studies with larger sample sizes and complementary measures of neuromuscular control are needed to support these findings.
Authors: Sharon Chen; Thomas J Ross; Wang Zhan; Carol S Myers; Keh-Shih Chuang; Stephen J Heishman; Elliot A Stein; Yihong Yang Journal: Brain Res Date: 2008-08-18 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Dustin R Grooms; Adam W Kiefer; Michael A Riley; Jonathan D Ellis; Staci Thomas; Katie Kitchen; Christopher A DiCesare; Scott Bonnette; Brooke Gadd; Kim D Barber Foss; Weihong Yuan; Paula Silva; Ryan Galloway; Jed A Diekfuss; James Leach; Kate Berz; Gregory D Myer Journal: J Sport Rehabil Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Lukas Jaeger; Laura Marchal-Crespo; Peter Wolf; Robert Riener; Lars Michels; Spyros Kollias Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Ann S Choe; Craig K Jones; Suresh E Joel; John Muschelli; Visar Belegu; Brian S Caffo; Martin A Lindquist; Peter C M van Zijl; James J Pekar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elvira Pirondini; Martina Coscia; Jesus Minguillon; José Del R Millán; Dimitri Van De Ville; Silvestro Micera Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Scott Bonnette; Christopher A DiCesare; Jed A Diekfuss; Dustin R Grooms; Ryan P MacPherson; Michael A Riley; Gregory D Myer Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Jed A Diekfuss; Dustin R Grooms; Scott Bonnette; Christopher A DiCesare; Staci Thomas; Ryan P MacPherson; Jonathan D Ellis; Adam W Kiefer; Michael A Riley; Daniel K Schneider; Brooke Gadd; Katie Kitchen; Kim D Barber Foss; Jonathan A Dudley; Weihong Yuan; Gregory D Myer Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Dustin R Grooms; Jed A Diekfuss; Cody R Criss; Manish Anand; Alexis B Slutsky-Ganesh; Christopher A DiCesare; Gregory D Myer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-08-11 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Manish Anand; Jed A Diekfuss; Scott Bonnette; Ian Short; Matthew Hurn; Dustin R Grooms; Gregory D Myer Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2020-12
Authors: Manish Anand; Jed A Diekfuss; Alexis B Slutsky-Ganesh; Dustin R Grooms; Scott Bonnette; Kim D Barber Foss; Christopher A DiCesare; Jennifer L Hunnicutt; Gregory D Myer Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Joann M Walker; Caroline L Brunst; Meredith Chaput; Timothy R Wohl; Dustin R Grooms Journal: Phys Ther Sport Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 2.920
Authors: Andrew Strong; Helena Grip; Carl-Johan Boraxbekk; Jonas Selling; Charlotte K Häger Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 3.169