Literature DB >> 31377088

Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Patterns Among Women With Medicaid and Commercial Insurance.

Machaon M Bonafede1, Jeffrey D Miller2, Scott K Pohlman3, Kathleen A Troeger3, Brian L Sprague4, Sally D Herschorn5, Isabelle H Winer2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite healthcare reforms mandating expanded insurance coverage and reduced out-of-pocket costs for preventive care, cancer screening rates remain relatively static. No study has measured cancer screening rates for multiple tests among non-Medicare patients.
METHODS: This retrospective, population-based claims analysis, conducted in 2016-2017, of commercially insured and Medicaid-insured women aged 30-59 years enrolled in IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid Databases (containing approximately 90 and 17 million enrollees, respectively) during 2010-2015 describes screening rates for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. Key outcomes were (1) proportion screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer among the age-eligible population compared with accepted age-based recommendations and (2) proportion with longer-than-recommended intervals between tests.
RESULTS: One half (54.7%) of commercially insured women aged 40-59 years (n=1,538,444) were screened three or more times during the 6-year study period for breast cancer; for Medicaid-insured women (n=78,897), the rates were lower (23.7%). One third (43.4%) of commercially insured and two thirds (68.9%) of Medicaid-insured women had a >2.5-year gap between mammograms. Among women aged 30-59 years, 59.3% of commercially insured women and 31.4% of Medicaid-insured women received two or more Pap tests. The proportion of patients with a >3.5-year gap between Pap tests was 33.9% (commercially insured) and 57.1% (Medicaid-insured). Among women aged 50-59 years, 63.3% of commercially insured women and 47.2% of Medicaid-insured women were screened at least one time for colorectal cancer. Almost all women aged 30-59 years (commercially insured, 99.1%; Medicaid-insured, 98.9%) had at least one healthcare encounter.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast and cervical cancer screenings remain underutilized among both commercially insured and Medicaid-insured populations, with lower rates among the Medicaid-insured population. However, almost all women had at least one healthcare encounter, suggesting opportunities for better coordinated care.
Copyright © 2019 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31377088     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  13 in total

Review 1.  Health Economics Research in Cancer Screening: Research Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Lindsay M Sabik; Natasha K Stout; Michael T Halpern; Joseph Lipscomb; Scott Ramsey; Debra P Ritzwoller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  US women screen at low rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer: a cross-sectional population-based observational study.

Authors:  Diane M Harper; Melissa Plegue; Masahito Jimbo; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin; Ananda Sen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Medicaid expansion and 2-year survival in women with gynecologic cancer: a difference-in-difference analysis.

Authors:  Sarah P Huepenbecker; Shuangshuang Fu; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Kristin M Primm; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 10.693

4.  The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network: Accelerating the implementation of evidence-based cancer prevention and control interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer Leeman; Karen Glanz; Peggy Hannon; Jackilen Shannon
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Sociodemographic correlates of colorectal cancer screening completion among women adherent to mammography screening guidelines by place of birth.

Authors:  Deeonna E Farr; Leslie E Cofie; Alison T Brenner; Ronny A Bell; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Comparisons of Papanicolaou Utilization and Cervical Cancer Detection between Rural and Urban Women in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chiu-Ming Yang; Fung-Chang Sung; Chao-Song Hsue; Chih-Hsin Muo; Shu-Wei Wang; Shwn-Huey Shieh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Association of Sociodemographic Factors, Breast Cancer Fear, and Perceived Self-Efficacy With Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Middle-Aged Nigerian Women.

Authors:  Rita Ngozi Ezema; Charles Chima Igbokwe; Tochi Emmanuel Iwuagwu; Olaoluwa Samson Agbaje; Justina Ifeoma Ofuebe; Lawretta Ijeoma Abugu; Dorothy Doris Eze; Yohanna Wamanyi
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2021-09-30

8.  Preventative Cancer Screening Rates Among Uninsured Patients in Free Clinics: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Cancer Survivors and Non-cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Madeline MacDonald; Abu-Sayeef Mirza; Rahul Mhaskar; Aldenise Ewing; Liwei Chen; Katherine Robinson; Yuanyuan Lu; Noura Ayoubi; Eduardo Gonzalez; Lucy Guerra; Richard Roetzheim; Laurie Woodard; Smitha Pabbathi
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

9.  Impact of social determinants of health on colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in the COVID reopening phase.

Authors:  Alexa M Choy; Benjamin Lebwohl; Anna Krigel
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Factors associated with mammography use: A side-by-side comparison of results from two national surveys.

Authors:  Lihua Li; Jiayi Ji; Melanie Besculides; Nina Bickell; Laurie R Margolies; Lina Jandorf; Emanuela Taioli; Madhu Mazumdar; Bian Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.