Amy Trowbridge1, Tara Bamat2, Heather Griffis3, Eric McConathey2, Chris Feudtner4, Jennifer K Walter4. 1. Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Seattle Children's Hospital and University of Washington (A Trowbridge), Seattle, Wash. Electronic address: amy.trowbridge@seattlechildrens.org. 2. Pediatric Advanced Care Team, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (T Bamat, E McConathey, C Feudtner, and JK Walter), Philadelphia, Pa. 3. PolicyLab, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (H Griffis), Philadelphia, Pa. 4. Pediatric Advanced Care Team, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (T Bamat, E McConathey, C Feudtner, and JK Walter), Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Medical Ethics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (C Feudtner and JK Walter), Philadelphia, Pa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pediatric residents are expected to be competent in end-of-life (EOL) care. We aimed to quantify pediatric resident exposure to patient deaths, and the context of these exposures. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all deceased patients at one children's hospital over 3 years collected patient demographics, time, and location of death. Mode of death was determined after chart review. Each death was cross-referenced with pediatric resident call schedules to determine residents involved within 48 hours of death. Descriptive statistics are presented. RESULTS: Of 579 patients who died during the study period, 46% had resident involvement. Most deaths occurred in the NICU (30% of all deaths); however, resident exposure to EOL care most commonly occurred in the PICU (52% of resident exposures) and were after withdrawals of life-sustaining therapy (41%), followed by nonescalation (31%) and failed resuscitation (15%). During their postgraduate year (PGY)-1, <1% of residents encountered a patient death. During PGY-2 and PGY-3, 96% and 78%, respectively, of residents encountered at least 1 death. During PGY-2, residents encountered a mean of 3.5 patient deaths (range 0-12); during PGY-3, residents encountered a mean of 1.4 deaths (range 0-5). Residents observed for their full 3-year residency encountered a mean of 5.6 deaths (range 2-10). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residents have limited but variable exposure to EOL care, with most exposures in the ICU after withdrawal of life-sustaining technology. Educators should consider how to optimize EOL education with limited clinical exposure, and design resident support and education with these variable exposures in mind.
OBJECTIVE: Pediatric residents are expected to be competent in end-of-life (EOL) care. We aimed to quantify pediatric resident exposure to patientdeaths, and the context of these exposures. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all deceased patients at one children's hospital over 3 years collected patient demographics, time, and location of death. Mode of death was determined after chart review. Each death was cross-referenced with pediatric resident call schedules to determine residents involved within 48 hours of death. Descriptive statistics are presented. RESULTS: Of 579 patients who died during the study period, 46% had resident involvement. Most deaths occurred in the NICU (30% of all deaths); however, resident exposure to EOL care most commonly occurred in the PICU (52% of resident exposures) and were after withdrawals of life-sustaining therapy (41%), followed by nonescalation (31%) and failed resuscitation (15%). During their postgraduate year (PGY)-1, <1% of residents encountered a patientdeath. During PGY-2 and PGY-3, 96% and 78%, respectively, of residents encountered at least 1 death. During PGY-2, residents encountered a mean of 3.5 patientdeaths (range 0-12); during PGY-3, residents encountered a mean of 1.4 deaths (range 0-5). Residents observed for their full 3-year residency encountered a mean of 5.6 deaths (range 2-10). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric residents have limited but variable exposure to EOL care, with most exposures in the ICU after withdrawal of life-sustaining technology. Educators should consider how to optimize EOL education with limited clinical exposure, and design resident support and education with these variable exposures in mind.
Authors: Katharine E Brock; Harvey J Cohen; Barbara M Sourkes; Julie J Good; Louis P Halamek Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Jane Gannon; Carol Motycka; Eric Egelund; Dale F Kraemer; W Thomas Smith; Kathleen Solomon Journal: J Nurs Educ Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 1.726
Authors: Janet R Serwint; Lorene E Rutherford; Nancy Hutton; Peter C Rowe; Susan Barker; Graceanne Adamo Journal: Acad Med Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Rocío Rodríguez-Rey; Alba Palacios; Jesús Alonso-Tapia; Elena Pérez; Elena Álvarez; Ana Coca; Santiago Mencía; Ana Marcos; Juan Mayordomo-Colunga; Francisco Fernández; Fernando Gómez; Jaime Cruz; Olga Ordóñez; Ana Llorente Journal: Aust Crit Care Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 2.737