Literature DB >> 31376231

Whole-genome sequencing revealed an interstitial deletion encompassing OCRL and SMARCA1 gene in a patient with Lowe syndrome.

Bixia Zheng1, Qiuxia Chen2, Chunli Wang1, Wei Zhou1, Ying Chen2, Guixia Ding2, Zhanjun Jia1, Aihua Zhang2,3, SongMing Huang2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lowe syndrome is a rare X-linked syndrome that is characterized by involvement of the eyes, central nervous system, and kidneys. The aim of the present study was to determine the molecular basis of four patients with congenital cataract, infantile congenital hypotonia, and proximal renal tubular defect.
METHODS: Four children who met the clinical manifestations of Lowe syndrome were enrolled in this study. Patients' clinical information on eyes, central nervous system, kidneys, and family histories, etc., were reviewed and analyzed. After obtaining informed consent, we performed a mutation analysis of OCRL gene using direct sequencing. Because of failure of PCR amplification, low coverage shortread whole genome sequencing (CNVseq) analysis was performed on one proband. Real-time PCR was subsequently performed to confirm the CNV that was detected from the CNVseq results.
RESULTS: We identified three OCRL allelic variants, including two novel missense mutations (c.1423C>T/p.Pro475Ser, c.1502T>G/p.Ile501Ser) and one recurrent nonsense mutation (c.2464C>T/p.Arg822Ter). Various bioinformatic tools revealed scores associated with potential pathogenic effects for the two missense variants, and protein alignments revealed that both variants affected an amino acid highly conserved among species. Since deletion of the entire gene was suspected in a patient, CNVseq was used, identifying an interstitial deletion to approximately 190 kb, encompassing OCRL, and SMARCA1 gene. Moreover, the hemizygous CNV was confirmed by qPCR. Reviewing another case reported in the literature, we found that the deletion of OCRL and nearby genes may contribute to a more severe phenotype and premature death.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of an interstitial deletion encompassing OCRL and SMARCA1 gene in Lowe syndrome. Our results expand the spectrum of mutations of the OCRL gene in Chinese population. Moreover, whole-genome sequencing presents a comprehensive and reliable approach for detecting genomic copy number variation in patients or carriers in the family with rare inherited disorders.
© 2019 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNVseq; Lowe syndrome; OCRL gene; copy number variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31376231      PMCID: PMC6732312          DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med        ISSN: 2324-9269            Impact factor:   2.183


INTRODUCTION

Lowe syndrome (OMIM, #309000) is a multisystem disorder characterized by ocular abnormalities, neurological involvement, and renal dysfunction of the Fanconi type (Charnas, Bernardini, Rader, Hoeg, & Gahl, 1991). In 1992, the causative gene OCRL (OMIM, *300535) was identified on the X chromosome, which encodes a 5‐phosphatase that acts preferentially on phosphatidylinositol 4,5‑bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) (Attree et al., 1992). Mutations in OCRL also cause Dent disease 2 (OMIM, #300555), a milder phenotype that only results in proximal renal tubulopathy (Hoopes et al., 2005). OCRL is composed of 23 exons. Exons 2–5 encode the pleckstrin homology (PH)‐like domain, exons 9–15 encode the 5‐phosphatase catalytic domain, and exons 16–22 encode the ASPM, SPD‐2, Hydin (ASH) and RhoGAP‐like domains of the OCRL protein (Faucherre et al., 2003; Mao et al., 2009; Peck, Douglas, Wu, & Burbelo, 2002). Since this time, more than 260 different nonsense, frameshift, splice site, or missense mutations have been annotated for OCRL gene in the Human Gene Mutation Database (http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk), and they are distributed across all exons. Of note, nearly all mutations associated with Lowe syndrome are mapped in exons 8–23, which comprises the inositol polyphosphate 5‑phosphatase, ASH and RhoGAP‐like domains, whereas the majority of mutations that cause Dent disease 2 are located in exons 1–7, which encompass the PH domain. Differing clinical presentations have been noted in unrelated individuals with the same OCRL pathogenic variant. The severity of the clinical phenotype of patients with Lowe syndrome and Dent disease 2 can vary considerably, even between patients with mutations that are predicted to cause complete loss of function of the protein or between patients who share the same mutation, suggesting that genetic background might influence the clinical expression of the disease (Hichri et al., 2011; Recker et al., 2015). In this study, we performed a detailed genetic and phenotypic analysis of four patients presenting with Lowe syndrome. In particular, low coverage shortread whole genome sequencing (CNVseq) identified an interstitial deletion encompassing OCRL and SMARCA1 gene.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four male boys who presented with congenital cataract, infantile congenital hypotonia, and proximal renal tubular defect were included in the study. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral leukocytes of the proband and their parents using a DNA isolation kit (Tiangen, China) according to the manufacturer's protocol. All patients and families gave informed consent for participation in the study. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

Mutation analysis by Sanger sequencing

All exonic sequences and intron–exon boundaries of OCRL (Ensembl Accession ENSG00000122126) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers designed by Primer Premier 5.0. All primers are listed in Supplemental Table S1. The PCR products were gel‐ and column‐purified and directly sequenced. The purified PCR fragments were then sequenced using Big Dye Terminator (Applied Biosystems) on an ABI 3130 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems). All variants were denoted based on the NCBI reference sequence for OCRL (NM_000276.3).

Copy number variant (CNV) analysis by WGS

Approximately 1 μg of DNA was used to prepare library. Genomic DNA sample was sheared to 200–300 bp by sonication and all other steps were followed according to the manufacturer's protocol. Subsequently, the DNA was sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform. Raw image files were processed by the BclToFastq(Illumina)for base calling and generating the raw data. After removing reads with adaptors and low quality reads, the clean data was aligned to the NCBI human reference genome (hg19) using BWA. 100 kb and above CNV can be detected using chigene independently developed CNV analysis software (Chigene Translational Medicine Research Center). Decipher, ClinVar, OMIM, DGV, and ClinGen databases were used to analyze the genes included in CNV and other disease‐related annotations in order to obsess the Pathogenicity classification of CNV.

qPCR confirmation of the CNV

The primer pair sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Samples for qPCR were assayed in triplicate using the Takara SYBR Green with GAPDH genomic content used as an endogenous control for normalization of the data. The ΔΔCt comparison method was used to measure relative DNA content on the QuantStudio™ 3 instrument (ThermoFisher).

Bioinformatics predictions

The function effects of the novel missense mutations identified in this study were predicted with the software PolyPhen‐2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org), and mutationtaster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/).

RESULTS

Clinical presentation

Clinical features of our patients are listed in Table 1. The mean age of the patients at diagnosis was 17.5 months (range, 6 months 15 days–2 years 4 months).
Table 1

Clinical and genetic characterization of patients examined for OCRL gene mutations

SubjectPatient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4
GenderMaleMaleMaleMale
Age2 years 1 month2 years 4 month6 month 15 days11 months
Mutationc.1423C>Tc.2464C>Tinterstitial deletionc.1502T>G
Protein changep.Pro475Serp. Arg822Terp. Ile501Ser
Neurological symptomsSevere hypotonia, intellectual impairmentSevere hypotonia, intellectual impairmentSevere hypotonia, hypermyotonia and amyotrophySevere hypotonia
Ocular manifestationsStrabismus,nystagmus, congenital cataractCongenital cataractCongenital cataractCongenital cataract,nystagmus
Renal manifestationsProteinuria, hypercalciuriaProteinuria, hypercalciuria, metabolic acidosisProteinuria, hypercalciuria, metabolic acidosis,nephrocalcinosisProteinuria, hypercalciuria, metabolic acidosis,nephrocalcinosis
RicketsSquare headPigeon chest, mild bracelet sign
Other featuresGrowth retardationGrowth retardation, right hydrocele of testisGrowth retardation, anemia, poor brain development, feeding difficultiesGrowth retardation, ventricular septal defect,cryptorchidism

Accession no: NM_000276.3.

Clinical and genetic characterization of patients examined for OCRL gene mutations Accession no: NM_000276.3.

Eyes involvements

Bilateral cataracts were observed at birth, and all of them had accepted early cataract extraction. Strabismus was also presented in patient 1 and patient 4. The mother of patient 3 and patient 4 had cataract and strabismus, respectively.

Neurological symptoms

Severe hypotonia at birth with loss of deep‐tendon reflexes were observed in all of patients. Patient 1 and 2 have intellectual impairment. Hypermyotonia and amyotrophy occurred in patient 3. Besides, patient 3 also has poor brain development, and the brain MRI shows that the extra‐brain space of the bilateral frontal sac is widened, the corpus callosum is thin, and the lateral ventricle is abnormal. He died at 7 months of age from unknown causes.

Renal manifestations

Proteinuria developed in the first months of life in all affected patients, and urinary α1 microglobulin was elevated. Hypercalciuria was observed in all of them, and nephrocalcinosis was found in patient 3 and patient 4. Three of them also showed metabolic acidosis. The eGFR at the last follow‐up was normal in all patients.

Other presentations

Growth retardation was observed in all patients. In two patients (patient 1 and patient 2), rickets were observed, such as square head, pigeon chest, mild bracelet sign. Anemia was observed in two patients (patient 3 and patient 4). Patient 3 also showed platelet dysfunction but without bleeding. Hydrocele testis and cryptorchidism were observed in patient 2 and 4, respectively.

Identification of three‐point mutations in OCRL gene

By direct sequencing of the OCRL gene, we identified three hemizygous point mutations (c.1423C>T/p.Pro475Ser, c.1502T>G/p.Ile501Ser, and c.2464C>T/p.Arg822Ter). All the three mutations were maternally inherited. The two missense mutations have not been reported in the genomic databases or the literature at the time of query. Various bioinformatic tools revealed scores associated with potential pathogenic effects for the two missense variants. In addition, protein alignments revealed that both variants, located in the 5‑phosphatase domain of the protein, affected an amino acid highly conserved among species (Figure 1a). The nonsense mutation p.Arg822Ter, that has been previously described, was detected in patient 2. The premature stop codon at residue 822 leads to the partial loss of RhoGAP‐like domain, which is characterized by the presence of many sites that mediate interaction of OCRL with RabGTPases and proteins associated with actin polymerization.
Figure 1

(a) Alignment of OCRL orthologs in different species around the mutated amino acids residues; (b) Schematic illustration showing the distribution of identified alterations relative to the OCRL protein structure depicting the pleckstrin homology (PH)‐like domain, 5‐phosphatase catalytic domain, ASH and RhoGAP‐like domains. (c) Structural visualization of the identified OCRL missense alterations using the crystal structure of OCRL in complex with a phosphate ion (PDB accession 4CMN). The residues present at our two mutation sites are shown as sticks

(a) Alignment of OCRL orthologs in different species around the mutated amino acids residues; (b) Schematic illustration showing the distribution of identified alterations relative to the OCRL protein structure depicting the pleckstrin homology (PH)‐like domain, 5‐phosphatase catalytic domain, ASH and RhoGAP‐like domains. (c) Structural visualization of the identified OCRL missense alterations using the crystal structure of OCRL in complex with a phosphate ion (PDB accession 4CMN). The residues present at our two mutation sites are shown as sticks

Identification and validation of a hemizygous deletion in Xq25‐26

Deletion of the entire gene was suspected in patient 3 because of failure of PCR amplification. Copy number variant analysis of the WGS data identified an interstitial deletion encompassing the OCRL and SMARCA1 gene (chrX: 128548236 ‐128738236, q25‐q26.1) in the proband (Figure 2a). The deletion was heterozygous in his mother. We designed several primers in the OCRL gene to confirm the deletion. Validation of this deletion by qPCR confir hemizygous and heterozygous in the proband and his mother, respectively (Figure 2b).
Figure 2

The detection of a 190kb deletion on Xq25‐26. Datapoints for the low coverage whole genome sequencing tracks represent the genomic start coordinate of each aligned sequence read. (a) Datapoints from the affect proband. The red track displays the 190 kb deletion. (b) Datapoints from the heterozygous mother. (c) qPCR analysis of relative DNA content in whole blood from the control subject, father, mother, and proband

The detection of a 190kb deletion on Xq25‐26. Datapoints for the low coverage whole genome sequencing tracks represent the genomic start coordinate of each aligned sequence read. (a) Datapoints from the affect proband. The red track displays the 190 kb deletion. (b) Datapoints from the heterozygous mother. (c) qPCR analysis of relative DNA content in whole blood from the control subject, father, mother, and proband

DISCUSSION

We identified four variants of the OCRL gene in four patients with Lowe syndrome, including two novel missense mutations, one recurrent nonsense mutation and a microdeletion encompassing OCRL and SMARCA1 gene. The clinical features present in these patients are generally consistent with the pathophysiology found in Lowe syndrome, including: bilateral dense congenital cataracts, infantile congenital hypotonia, delayed development, LMW proteinuria, metabolic acidosis, rickets, hypercalciuria, and nephrocalcinosis. Additionally, other urogenital abnormalities including cryptorchidism and hydrocele testis also were observed in our patients. All the diagnosis of our patients was delayed. Female heterozygotes with Lowe syndrome can have mild features of the disorder. The mother of patient 3 and patient 4 had cataract and strabismus, respectively. In addition, the mother of patient 4 had intellectual disability. The life expectancy of patients with Lowe syndrome is estimated to be approximately 40 years and death is usually secondary to CKD and its related complications (Zaniew et al., 2018). Patient 3 died at 7 months of age from unknown causes. Copy number variations (CNVs) within the human genome have been linked to a diversity of inherited diseases and phenotypic traits. It is estimated that up to 10% of the human genome is affected by CNVs (Truty et al., 2018). According to HGMD, there were 11 gross deletion of OCRL gene have been reported. Here, we identified an interstitial deletion encompassing the OCRL and SMARCA1 gene in an affected male with severe features of Lowe syndrome. Only one patient carrying the deletion of the OCRL and nearby genes has been described. Addis et al identified a genomic deletion in Xq25 covering the entire OCRL gene and three other genes (SMARCA1, WDR4OB, and ACTRT1) in an Italian patient who died at 5 months of age from unknown causes (Addis et al., 2007). Similarly, in our study, the patient harboring the interstitial deletion encompassing OCRL and SMARCA1 gene presented with severe features of Lowe syndrome after birth and died at 7 months of age from unknown causes. In particular, he had poor brain development. The SMARCA1 gene in the deleted interval does not have known phenotypic or disease variations. SMARCA1 gene, also known as SNF2L, was expressed in terminally differentiated neurons after birth and in adult mice, as well as in adult ovaries and testes (Lazzaro & Picketts, 2001). SMARCA1 was found to be a component of a second chromatin remodeling complex, called CERF that contains the CECR2 protein, a transcription factor involved in neurulation and a cause of exencephaly in mice when mutated (Banting et al., 2005). In addition, previous study also demonstrated that SNF2L has a genetic link with Foxg1, which play a key role in the regulation of neurogenesis (Yip et al., 2012). Therefore, it could not be excluded the possibility that additional features caused by the deletion of SMARCA1 aggravate the phenotype of Lowe syndrome. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is the common method of choice for performing genome‐wide screening for large genomics abnormalities (McMullan et al., 2009; Miller et al., 2010). Most of reported large gene deletions in OCRL gene were identified by aCGH or FISH (Addis et al., 2007; Peverall, Edkins, Goldblatt, & Murch, 2000). More recently, though, the use of next‐generation sequencing (NGS) methods for the detection of copy number variants has also been increasing (Gross et al., 2018; Wood et al., 2010). In particular, CNVseq is a reliable and cheap approach which has diagnostic sensitivity for germline CNVs comparable to that of standard aCGH reagents (Zhou et al., 2018). Here, we showed that CNVseq offers an alternative data source to allow for the detection and characterization of the copy number across different genomic regions in a single experiment. This is the first report of an interstitial deletion encompassing OCRL and SMARCA1 gene in Lowe syndrome. The findings related to the spectrum of large genomic deletion and some new point mutations will increase our understanding on the genetic characteristics of Lowe syndrome in Chinese population. Moreover, the use of the whole‐genome sequencing technique facilitated carrier and prenatal testing for the deletion in the family with Lowe syndrome.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Click here for additional data file.
  21 in total

1.  From Lowe syndrome to Dent disease: correlations between mutations of the OCRL1 gene and clinical and biochemical phenotypes.

Authors:  Haifa Hichri; John Rendu; Nicole Monnier; Charles Coutton; Olivier Dorseuil; Rosa Vargas Poussou; Geneviève Baujat; Anne Blanchard; François Nobili; Bruno Ranchin; Michel Remesy; Rémi Salomon; Véronique Satre; Joel Lunardi
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  Human RhoGAP domain-containing proteins: structure, function and evolutionary relationships.

Authors:  Jeremy Peck; Gilbert Douglas; Catherine H Wu; Peter D Burbelo
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2002-09-25       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Clinical and laboratory findings in the oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe, with special reference to growth and renal function.

Authors:  L R Charnas; I Bernardini; D Rader; J M Hoeg; W A Gahl
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Dent Disease with mutations in OCRL1.

Authors:  Richard R Hoopes; Antony E Shrimpton; Stephen J Knohl; Paul Hueber; Bernd Hoppe; Janos Matyus; Ari Simckes; Velibor Tasic; Burkhard Toenshoff; Sharon F Suchy; Robert L Nussbaum; Steven J Scheinman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Characterization of 28 novel patients expands the mutational and phenotypic spectrum of Lowe syndrome.

Authors:  Florian Recker; Marcin Zaniew; Detlef Böckenhauer; Nunzia Miglietti; Arend Bökenkamp; Anna Moczulska; Anna Rogowska-Kalisz; Guido Laube; Valerie Said-Conti; Belde Kasap-Demir; Anna Niemirska; Mieczysław Litwin; Grzegorz Siteń; Krystyna H Chrzanowska; Małgorzata Krajewska-Walasek; Sidharth K Sethi; Velibor Tasic; Franca Anglani; Maria Addis; Anna Wasilewska; Maria Szczepańska; Krzysztof Pawlaczyk; Przemysław Sikora; Michael Ludwig
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Using next-generation sequencing for high resolution multiplex analysis of copy number variation from nanogram quantities of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens.

Authors:  Henry M Wood; Ornella Belvedere; Caroline Conway; Catherine Daly; Rebecca Chalkley; Melissa Bickerdike; Claire McKinley; Phil Egan; Lisa Ross; Bruce Hayward; Joanne Morgan; Leslie Davidson; Ken MacLennan; Thian K Ong; Kostas Papagiannopoulos; Ian Cook; David J Adams; Graham R Taylor; Pamela Rabbitts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Lowe syndrome protein OCRL1 interacts with Rac GTPase in the trans-Golgi network.

Authors:  Adèle Faucherre; Pierrette Desbois; Véronique Satre; Joël Lunardi; Olivier Dorseuil; Gérard Gacon
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Copy-number variants in clinical genome sequencing: deployment and interpretation for rare and undiagnosed disease.

Authors:  Andrew M Gross; Subramanian S Ajay; Vani Rajan; Carolyn Brown; Krista Bluske; Nicole J Burns; Aditi Chawla; Alison J Coffey; Alka Malhotra; Alicia Scocchia; Erin Thorpe; Natasa Dzidic; Karine Hovanes; Trilochan Sahoo; Egor Dolzhenko; Bryan Lajoie; Amirah Khouzam; Shimul Chowdhury; John Belmont; Eric Roller; Sergii Ivakhno; Stephen Tanner; Julia McEachern; Tina Hambuch; Michael Eberle; R Tanner Hagelstrom; David R Bentley; Denise L Perry; Ryan J Taft
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Prevalence and properties of intragenic copy-number variation in Mendelian disease genes.

Authors:  Rebecca Truty; Joshua Paul; Michael Kennemer; Stephen E Lincoln; Eric Olivares; Robert L Nussbaum; Swaroop Aradhya
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Future of Genetic Disease Studies: Assembling an Updated Multidisciplinary Toolbox.

Authors:  Swetha Ramadesikan; Jennifer Lee; Ruben Claudio Aguilar
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Novel pathogenic OCRL mutations and genotype-phenotype analysis of Chinese children affected by oculocerebrorenal syndrome: two cases and a literature review.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Linxia Deng; Xiaohong Chen; Yingjie Hu; Yaxian Chen; Kang Chen; Jianhua Zhou
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 3.063

3.  Genotype Phenotype Correlation in Dent Disease 2 and Review of the Literature: OCRL Gene Pleiotropism or Extreme Phenotypic Variability of Lowe Syndrome?

Authors:  Lisa Gianesello; Jennifer Arroyo; Dorella Del Prete; Giovanna Priante; Monica Ceol; Peter C Harris; John C Lieske; Franca Anglani
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.141

4.  A pan-cancer bioinformatic analysis of the carcinogenic role of SMARCA1 in human carcinomas.

Authors:  Lei Dai; Joseph Mugaanyi; Tongyue Zhang; Jingshu Tong; Xingchen Cai; Caide Lu; Changjiang Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Ocular findings and genomics of X-linked recessive disorders: A review.

Authors:  Asima Hassan; Yaser R Mir; Raja A H Kuchay
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.969

6.  Whole-genome sequencing revealed an interstitial deletion encompassing OCRL and SMARCA1 gene in a patient with Lowe syndrome.

Authors:  Bixia Zheng; Qiuxia Chen; Chunli Wang; Wei Zhou; Ying Chen; Guixia Ding; Zhanjun Jia; Aihua Zhang; SongMing Huang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.183

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.