| Literature DB >> 31374966 |
Marie Lemerle1, Anne-Sophie Garnier1, Martin Planchais1, Benoit Brilland1,2, Jean-François Subra1,3, Odile Blanchet4, Simon Blanchard3, Anne Croue5, Agnès Duveau1, Jean-François Augusto6,7.
Abstract
Predictive biomarkers of acute rejection (AR) are lacking. Pre-transplant expression of CD45RC on blood CD8+ T cells has been shown to predict AR in kidney transplant (KT) patients. The objective of the present study was to study CD45RC expression in a large cohort of KT recipients exposed to modern immunosuppressive regimens. CD45RC expression on T cells was analyzed in 128 KT patients, where 31 patients developed AR, of which 24 were found to be T-cell mediated (TCMR). Pre-transplant CD4+ and CD8+ CR45RChigh T cell proportions were significantly higher in patients with AR. The frequency of CD45RChigh T cells was significantly associated with age at transplantation but was not significantly different according to gender, history of transplantation, pre-transplant immunization, and de novo donor specific anti-Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) antibody. Survival-free AR was significantly better in patients with CD8+ CD45RChigh T cells below 58.4% (p = 0.0005), but not different according to CD4+ T cells (p = 0.073). According to multivariate analysis, CD8+ CD45RChigh T cells above 58.4% increased the risk of AR 4-fold (HR 3.96, p = 0.003). Thus, pre-transplant CD45RC expression on CD8+ T cells predicted AR, mainly TCMR, in KT patients under modern immunosuppressive therapies. We suggest that CD45RC expression should be evaluated in a prospective study to validate its usefulness to quantify the pre-transplant risk of AR.Entities:
Keywords: CD45RC; acute rejection; kidney transplantation; lymphocyte
Year: 2019 PMID: 31374966 PMCID: PMC6723395 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8081147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Flowchart of the study.
Baseline characteristics of the population. Results are presented as a median with minimum to maximum value ranges for continuous variables and absolute count and percentage for categorical variables.
| All Patients | |
|---|---|
| ( | |
|
| |
| Sex (M/F) | 80/48 |
| Age (years) | 50.2 (18.0–79.2) |
| Weigh (kg) | 71.0 (41.0–115.0) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.0 (17.3–40.2) |
|
| |
| ADPKD | 33 (25.8) |
| IgA nephropathy | 17 (13.3) |
| Other GN | 13 (10.2) |
| TIN/urologic | 13 (10.2) |
| Vascular nephropathy/diabetic GN | 13 (10.2) |
| Vasculitis | 3 (2.3) |
| Lupus nephritis | 5 (3.9) |
| Undetermined nephropathy | 18 (14.1) |
| Others | 13 (10.2) |
|
| |
| Pre-transplant dialysis, n (%) | 92 (71.9) |
| Previous kidney transplantation, n (%) | 13 (10.2) |
| Donor age, years | 50.0 (3.0–87.0) |
| Cold ischemia time (hours) | 16.6 (2.0–35.4) |
| HLA mismatch | |
| HLA A&B&DR | 4.0 (0–6) |
| HLA A&B | 3.0 (0–4) |
| HLA DR | 1.0 (0–2) |
| Sensitization, | |
| Nonsensitized at transplantation | 89 (69.5) |
| PRA < 10% | 30 (23.4) |
| PRA 10–20% | 1 (0.8) |
| PRA > 20% | 8 (6.2) |
|
| |
| Induction therapy | |
| None, | 6 (4.7) |
| Basiliximab, | 72 (56.3) |
| Antithymocyte globulins, | 50 (39.1) |
| Maintenance regimen | |
| Tac-based, | 102 (79.6) |
| Cyclosporin-based, | 26 (20.3) |
| MMF or MPA, | 127 (99.2) |
ADPKD, autosomic dominant polycystic kidney disease; BMI, body mass index; GN, glomerulonephritis; HLA, human leukocyte antigens; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MPA, mycophenolic acid; PRA, Panel Reactive Antibody; Tac, tacrolimus; TIN, tubulo-interstitial nephropathy.
Acute rejection episodes. Results are presented as a median with minimum to maximum value ranges for continuous variables and absolute count and percentage for categorical variables.
|
| 3.82 ± 2.22 (0.02–8.53) |
|
| |
| Number of patients, | 31 (24.2) |
| Mean delay to first AR (years) | 0.73 ± 1.24 (0.02–4.83) |
| Histologically proven, | 28 (90.3) |
| TCMR | 24 (85.7) |
| Borderline | 6 (25.0) |
| Grade IA | 9 (37.5) |
| Grade IB | 8 (33.3) |
| Grade IIA | 1 (4.2) |
| AMR | 1 (3.6) |
| Mixed AR | 3 (10.7) |
| Non histologically proved AR | 3 (9.7) |
| More than one AR episode | 9 (7.0) |
|
| 15 (11.7) |
| Class I | 4 (26.7) |
| Class II | 11 (73.3) |
|
| |
| Serum creatinine (µmol/L) * | 141.4 ± 75.2 (60.0–716) |
| GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) * | 53.2 ± 21.8 (7.3–123) |
| Proteinuria/Creatininuria (g/g) * | 0.25 ± 0.69 (0–5.78) |
* In patients followed at the indicated time; AR, acute rejection; DSA, donor specific antibodies; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; disorder; TCMR, T-cell-mediated rejection; AMR, antibody-mediated rejection.
Univariate analysis of factors associated with acute rejection occurrence. Comparisons between groups were done using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and Χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Continuous variables are expressed as a median with minimum to maximum values and categorical variables are expressed as their absolute count and percentage. Acute rejection groups were compared to the No AR group. Significant p-values appear in bold.
| No AR | AR |
| BPAR |
| Excluding |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Sex (M/F) | 62/35 | 18/13 | 0.558 | 16/12 | 0.514 | 12/10 | 0.413 |
| Age (years) | 50.3 (18.0–79.2) | 48.2 (23.3–66.5) | 0.301 | 48.8 (23.3–66.5) | 0.368 | 45.5 (23.3–66.5) | 0.206 |
| No pretransplant immunization, | 64 (66.0) | 25 (80.6) | 0.123 | 23 (82.1) | 0.160 | 18 (81.8) | 0.203 |
| PRA > 20%, | 7 (7.2) | 1 (3.2) | 0.679 | 1 (3.6) | 0.682 | 1 (4.5) | 1.000 |
|
| |||||||
| Previous kidney transplantation, | 11 (11.3) | 2 (6.5) | 0.733 | 2 (7.1) | 0.731 | 2 (9.1) | 1.000 |
| Pre-transplant dialysis, | 77 (72.2) | 22 (71.0) | 0.897 | 20 (71.4) | 0,939 | 15 (68.2) | 0.709 |
| Donor age, years | 51.0 (3.0–87.0) | 47.0 (36.0–80.0) | 0.799 | 48 (36.0–80.0) | 0.769 | 43 (37.0–68.0) | 0.494 |
| Cold ischemia time (hours) | 17.0 (2.0–35.4) | 15.6 (2.0–32.2) | 0.434 | 15.5 (2.0–32.2) | 0.299 | 15.5 (2.0–32.2) | 0.359 |
| HLA mismatch (ABDR), | 4.0 (0–6) | 4.0 (0–6) | 0.733 | 4.0 (0–6) | 0.495 | 4.0 (0–6) | 0.750 |
| Delayed graft function, | 22 (22.7) | 6 (19.4) | 0.658 | 5 (17.9) | 0.551 | 4 (18.2) | 0.779 |
| De novo DSA, | 12 (12.4) | 3 (9.7) | 1.000 | 3 (10.7) | 1.000 | 3 (13.6) | 1.000 |
|
| |||||||
| Induction (none/Basiliximab/ATG), | 4 (4.1)/49 (50.5)/44 (45.4) | 2 (6.5)/23 (74.2)/6 (19.3) |
| 2(7.1)/21(75.0)/5(17.9) |
| 1(4.6)/16(72.7)/5(22.7) | 0.145 |
| Tacrolimus-based regimen, | 78 (80.4) | 23 (74.2) | 0.393 | 22 (78.6) | 0.752 | 16 (72.7) | 0.370 |
AR, acute rejection; BPAR, biopsy proven acute rejection; Bor AR, borderline AR.
Figure 2Analysis of proliferative capacities of CD45RClow and CD45RChigh T cells in ESRD patients and HD. After 72 h, the proliferation of activated CD4+CD45RClow (A), CD4+CD45RChigh (B), CD8+CD45RClow (C), and CD8+CD45RChigh (D) T cell subsets of ESRD patients (black bars) and HD (white bars) was analyzed. The experiment reported results of four ESRD patients and four age and matched HD. Error bars show the median with a 95% CI. Comparisons were done using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs rank test. ns, non-significant. CI, Confidence Interval; ESRD: end-stage renal disease; HD: heathy individuals.
Figure 3Proportion of CD45RChigh and CD45RClow CD4+ and CD8+ T cells according to gender (A), previous transplantation (B), pre-transplant PRA (C), de novo DSA occurrence (D), and age at transplantation (E). For A–D, comparisons were done using the Mann–Whitney U test and error bars show median with a 95% CI. For E, correlation analysis was done using the Spearman test. CI, Confidence Interval; PRA, Panel Reactive Antibody.
Frequency of CD4+ and CD8+ CD45RC subsets according to AR occurrence. Comparisons were done using the Mann–Whitney U test. Significant p-values appear in bold.
| Acute Rejection (all) | Yes | No |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| CD4+CD45RC high | 58.4 ± 13.7 | 51.2 ± 15.7 |
|
| CD8+CD45RC high | 62.5 ± 13.3 | 53.6 ± 19.3 |
|
| CD8+CD45RC int | 20.1 ± 7.7 | 23.2 ± 9.3 | 0.096 |
| CD8+CD45RC low | 17.9 ± 9.8 | 23.7 ± 14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CD4+CD45RC high | 59.2 ± 13.3 | 51.2 ± 15.7 |
|
| CD8+CD45RC high | 62.3 ± 13.0 | 53.6 ± 18.0 |
|
| CD8+CD45RC int | 20.1 ± 7.9 | 23.2 ± 9.3 | 0.117 |
| CD8+CD45RC low | 18.0 ± 10.3 | 23.7 ± 14.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CD4+CD45RC high | 60.0 ± 13.4 | 51.2 ± 15.7 | 0.016 |
| CD8+CD45RC high | 64.4 ± 12.2 | 53.6 ± 19.3 | 0.014 |
| CD8+CD45RC int | 19.7 ± 8.1 | 23.2 ± 9.3 | 0.110 |
| CD8+CD45RC low | 16.4 ± 7.9 | 23.7 ± 14.2 | 0.020 |
* Patients with clinical diagnosed AR without biopsy were excluded. ** Patients with biopsy-proven AR excluding patients with borderline AR. CD45RC subsets were determined as specified in the Materials and Method section. High, high expression; Low, low expression; Int, intermediate expression.
Figure 4Predictive value of CD4+ and CD8+ CD45RC T cell subsets. (A) ROC curve analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ CD45RChigh T cell subsets for AR prediction. (B) Rejection-free survival of patients according to CD8+ (upper panel) and CD4+ CD45RChigh T cell proportions. Comparison between survivals was done using a log-rank test. (C) predictive values of CD8+ CD45RChigh T cell above 58.4% for AR prediction. AUC: Area Under Curve.
Multivariate cox analysis of factors associated with acute rejection occurrence. Significant p-values appear in bold.
| Multivariate Cox Models | HR | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CD8+CD45RChigh (>58.4%) | 4.04 | 1.65–9.88 |
|
| Induction (ATG) | 0.39 | 0.16–0.94 |
| |
|
| CD8+CD45RChigh (>58.4%) | 4.42 | 1.49–13.1 |
|
| Induction (ATG) | 0.46 | 0.17–1.25 | 0.130 | |
|
| CD8+CD45RChigh (>58.4%) | 3.59 | 1.45–8.89 |
|
| Induction (ATG) | 0.35 | 0.13–0.93 |
|
* Patients with a biopsy–proven AR excluding patients with a borderline AR. ** Patients with a clinically diagnosed AR without biopsy were excluded.