Literature DB >> 30748089

Response to treatment and long-term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with acute T cell-mediated rejection.

Yassine Bouatou1,2, Denis Viglietti1,2, Daniele Pievani1,2, Kevin Louis1, Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen1,3, Marion Rabant3, Olivier Aubert1,4, Jean-Luc Taupin1,5, Denis Glotz1,2, Christophe Legendre1,4, Alexandre Loupy1,4, Carmen Lefaucheur1,2.   

Abstract

The recent recognition of complex and chronic phenotypes of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) has fostered the need to better evaluate the response of acute TCMR-a condition previously considered to lack relevant consequences for allograft survival-to the standard of care. In a prospective cohort of kidney recipients (n = 256) with biopsy-proven acute TCMR receiving corticosteroids, we investigated clinical, histological, and immunological phenotypes at the time of acute TCMR diagnosis and 3 months posttreatment. Independent posttreatment determinants of allograft loss included the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (HR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.92-0.96; P < .001), proteinuria (HR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.10-1.79; P = .007), time since transplantation (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.00-1.03; P = .016), peritubular capillaritis (HR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.13-4.55; P = .022), interstitial inflammation in sclerotic cortical parenchyma (i-IF/TA) (HR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.08-3.25; P = .025), and donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) (HR = 2.67; 95% CI = 1.46-4.88; P = .001). Prognostic value was improved using a composite evaluation of response to treatment versus clinical parameters only (cNRI = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.41-0.95; P < .001). A classification tree for allograft loss identified five patterns of response to treatment based on the posttreatment GFR, i-IF/TA, and anti-HLA DSAs (cross-validated accuracy = 0.80). Compared with responders (n = 155, 60.5%), nonresponders (n = 101, 39.5%) had a higher incidence of de novo DSAs, antibody-mediated rejection, and allograft loss at 10 years (P < .001 for all comparisons). Thus, clinical, histological, and immunological assessment of response to treatment of acute TCMR revealed different profiles of the response to treatment with distinct outcomes.
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; graft survival; kidney transplantation/nephrology; rejection: T cell mediated (TCMR)

Year:  2019        PMID: 30748089     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  20 in total

Review 1.  Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury.

Authors:  Michael Oellerich; Karen Sherwood; Paul Keown; Ekkehard Schütz; Julia Beck; Johannes Stegbauer; Lars Christian Rump; Philip D Walson
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Rejection in Kidney Allografts.

Authors:  James E Cooper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  B cells as antigen-presenting cells in transplantation rejection and tolerance.

Authors:  Anita S Chong
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.868

4.  Study protocol: the TRAnsplant BIOpsies (TRABIO) study - a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study to assess the treatment of kidney graft rejections.

Authors:  Friedrich Alexander von Samson-Himmelstjerna; Grit Esser; Kevin Schulte; Benedikt Kolbrink; Markus Krautter; Vedat Schwenger; Julia Weinmann-Menke; Julia Matschkal; Florian Schraml; Anne Pahl; Matthias Braunisch; Kerstin Amann; Thorsten Feldkamp; Ulrich Kunzendorf; Lutz Renders; Uwe Heemann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 5.  Mechanisms of organ transplant injury mediated by B cells and antibodies: Implications for antibody-mediated rejection.

Authors:  Anita S Chong
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Transcriptional dissection of differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs and messenger RNAs reveals the potential molecular mechanism after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Hengcheng Zhang; Guodong Shi; Qingqiao Hu; Henglu Zhang; Ming Zheng; Kuirong Jiang; Min Gu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

7.  The negative impact of T cell-mediated rejection on renal allograft survival in the modern era.

Authors:  Christie Rampersad; Robert Balshaw; Ian W Gibson; Julie Ho; Jamie Shaw; Martin Karpinski; Aviva Goldberg; Patricia Birk; David N Rush; Peter W Nickerson; Chris Wiebe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 9.369

8.  FOXP3 mRNA Profile Prognostic of Acute T Cell-mediated Rejection and Human Kidney Allograft Survival.

Authors:  Danny Luan; Darshana M Dadhania; Ruchuang Ding; Thangamani Muthukumar; Michelle Lubetzky; John R Lee; Vijay K Sharma; Phyllis August; Franco B Mueller; Joseph E Schwartz; Manikkam Suthanthiran
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 5.385

9.  Outfoxing Rejection: Urinary FOXP3 mRNA, TCMR, and the Fate of Allografts.

Authors:  Fasika M Tedla; Luis Sanchez Russo; Madhav C Menon
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 5.385

10.  Impact of Subclinical and Clinical Kidney Allograft Rejection Within 1 Year Posttransplantation Among Compatible Transplant With Steroid Withdrawal Protocol.

Authors:  Itunu Owoyemi; Srijan Tandukar; Dana R Jorgensen; Christine M Wu; Puneet Sood; Chethan Puttarajappa; Akhil Sharma; Nirav A Shah; Parmjeet Randhawa; Michele Molinari; Amit D Tevar; Rajil B Mehta; Sundaram Hariharan
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.