Literature DB >> 31374649

Comparison of Two Series Elastic Actuator Designs Incorporated into a Shoulder Exoskeleton.

Rafael Casas, Tianyao Chen, Peter S Lum.   

Abstract

Low impedance and torque control are critical for movement rehabilitation using robotic exoskeletons. A grounded 3 degree of freedom shoulder exoskeleton was designed for movement assistance in shoulder abduction/adduction, flexion/extension, and shoulder internal/external rotation. Two series elastic actuators designs were developed using a linear spring arrangement with a global nonlinear stiffness behavior. RMS errors during application of constant torque were less than.06 Nm in shoulder add/abd and less than.04 Nm in arm rotation as the limb was moved in sinusoidal trajectories up to 3.5 Hz. For abd/adduction, the step response rise time was.05 s, and free mode impedance peaked at.007 Nm/deg during 3.5 Hz oscillations. For arm rotation, the step response rise time was.03 s, and impedance peaked at.023 Nm/deg during 3.5 Hz oscillations. Both SEA designs had performance measurements that were similar to other SEA designs in terms of torque tracking, but with much lower impedance than previously reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31374649      PMCID: PMC7521626          DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot        ISSN: 1945-7898


  8 in total

1.  Series elastic actuator control of a powered exoskeleton.

Authors:  Daniel Ragonesi; Sunil Agrawal; Whitney Sample; Tariq Rahman
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

2.  Design of a rotational hydroelastic actuator for a powered exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation.

Authors:  Arno H A Stienenw; Edsko E G Hekman; Huub ter Braak; Arthur M M Aalsma; Frans C T van der Helm; Herman van der Kooij
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb After Stroke.

Authors:  Janne M Veerbeek; Anneli C Langbroek-Amersfoort; Erwin E H van Wegen; Carel G M Meskers; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Robotic therapy provides a stimulus for upper limb motor recovery after stroke that is complementary to and distinct from conventional therapy.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Brokaw; Diane Nichols; Rahsaan J Holley; Peter S Lum
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Comparison of joint space and end point space robotic training modalities for rehabilitation of interjoint coordination in individuals with moderate to severe impairment from chronic stroke.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Brokaw; Rahsaan J Holley; Peter S Lum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Human movement training with a cable driven ARm EXoskeleton (CAREX).

Authors:  Ying Mao; Xin Jin; Geetanjali Gera Dutta; John P Scholz; Sunil K Agrawal
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 7.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Thomas Platz; Joachim Kugler; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.