| Literature DB >> 31373538 |
Weifeng Shi1, Changwen Ke2, Shisong Fang3, Juan Li1, Hao Song4, Xiyan Li5,6,7, Tao Hu1, Jie Wu2, Tao Chen5,6,7, Lina Yi2,8, Yingchao Song2, Xin Wang3, Weijia Xing1, Weijuan Huang5,6,7, Hong Xiao2, Lijun Liang2, Bo Peng3, Weihua Wu3, Hui Liu3, William J Liu5,6,7, Edward C Holmes9, George F Gao10,11,12, Dayan Wang5,6,7.
Abstract
The spread of influenza A/H3N2 variants possessing the hemagglutinin 121 K mutation and the unexpectedly high incidence of influenza in the 2017-2018 northern hemisphere influenza season have raised serious concerns about the next pandemic. We summarized the national surveillance data of seasonal influenza in China and identified marked differences in influenza epidemics between northern and southern China, particularly the predominating subtype and the presence of an additional summer peak in southern China. Notably, a minor spring peak of influenza caused by a different virus subtype was also observed. We also revealed that the 3C.2a lineage was dominant from the summer of 2015 to the end of the 2015-2016 peak season in China, after which the 3C.2a2 lineage predominated despite the importation and co-circulation of the 121 K variants of 3C.2a1 and 3C.2a3 lineages at the global level. Finally, an analysis based on genetic distances revealed a delay in A/H3N2 vaccine strain update. Overall, our results highlight the complicated circulation pattern of seasonal influenza in China and the necessity for a timely vaccine strain update worldwide.Entities:
Keywords: A/H3N2; Influenza virus; mutation; vaccine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31373538 PMCID: PMC6713139 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1648183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
Figure 1.Epidemiological surveillance of seasonal human influenza in China since October 2014. Panels A and B show the epidemiological surveillance data of seasonal human influenza in northern and southern China since October 2014, respectively. In panels A and B, the bars represent the number of H3 positive samples, while the curves represent the positive rates of A/H3N2, A/H1N1, B/Yamagata and B/Victoria. Panel C shows the distribution of the 1417 strains newly sequenced in the present study.
Temporal distribution of the HA genotypes of influenza A/H3N2 virus in China.
| Collection date | Clade 1 | Clade 3C | Clade 3C.1 | Clade 3C.2 | Clade 3C.2a | Clade 3C.2a1 | Clade 3C.2a2 | Clade 3C.2a3 | Clade 3C.3 | Clade 3C.3a | Clade 3C.3b | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014–2015 Peak season | Southern China | 8 | 1 | 1 | 50 | 11 | 83 | 6 | 160 | ||||
| Northern China | 3 | 4 | 17 | 24 | |||||||||
| 2015 Off-season | Southern China | 1 | 250 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 2 | 274 | |||||
| Northern China | 11 | 1 | 12 | ||||||||||
| 2015–2016 Peak season | Southern China | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 53 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 78 | ||
| Northern China | 146 | 1 | 27 | 174 | |||||||||
| 2016 Off-season | Southern China | 1 | 20 | 48 | 1 | 70 | |||||||
| Northern China | 7 | 1 | 8 | ||||||||||
| 2016–2017 Peak season | Southern China | 5 | 31 | 7 | 243 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 305 | ||||
| Northern China | 3 | 53 | 4 | 60 | |||||||||
| 2017 Off-season | Southern China | 6 | 40 | 90 | 283 | 32 | 1 | 6 | 458 | ||||
| Northern China | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | ||||||||
| 2017–2018 Peak season | Southern China | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 13 | |||||||
| Northern China | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |||||||||
| Total | 2 | 11 | 15 | 2 | 618 | 103 | 641 | 45 | 21 | 188 | 9 | 1655 | |
Figure 2.Antigenic variation analysis of H3 HAs. Panel A, the five antigenic sites (epitopes A-E) are shown in H3 HA surface. The monomer of A/H3N2 HA (A/Victoria/361/2011, PDB code:4O5N) is shown. Antigenic sites A (yellow), B (cyan), C (green), D (blue) and E (pink) are coloured as indicated. The HAs from representative strains A/Texas/50/2012 (B), A/Switzerland/9715293/2013 (C), A/HongKong/4801/2014 (D), A/Singapore/INFIMH160019/2016 (E), A/Yunnan/Jinghong_1653/2017 (F), A/Guangdong/Dongguan_F20161100/2016 (G) are compared with A/Victoria/361/2011, and the distinct amino acid substitutions which lead to antigenic variation are highlighted.
Figure 3.Genetic distances of the HA1 protein between egg-propagated vaccine strains and the circulating strains from China. The left part shows the phylogenetic tree of the HA gene sequences of the Chinese strains sampled since 2015.The five vaccine strains proposed by the WHO are highlighted in the tree and numbered with 1–5. The right panel shows the genetic distances of the HA1 protein between egg-propagated vaccine strains and the circulating strains from China, estimated using the full-length HA1 protein sequences using Phylip (Felsenstein 2004). The numbers 1–5 in the upper right corner correspond to the five vaccine strains shown in the tree in the left panel.
Figure 4.The average genetic distance between egg-propagated vaccine strains and the circulating strains from China across different influenza seasons. The grey bars show the proportion of genetic distances within each 0.01 interval with an increase by genetic distance of 0.01. The red lines are the Gaussian regression curve of the genetic distance. The shaded areas indicate the period of time when the vaccine was proposed to be used until the next vaccine strain is proposed.
Figure 5.Phylogenetic analysis of the HA gene sequences of worldwide 121 K variants. Panel A: the 3C.2a1 subclade; panel B: the 3C.2a3subclade. The Chinese strains are highlighted in red in the two trees.