| Literature DB >> 31373170 |
Xiaohui Su1,2, Dong Lin1,3, Dandan Luo1, Mingqi Sun1, Xiaolei Wang4, Jifeng Ye5, Meijie Zhang1, Yikun Zhang4, Xiaolin Xu1,6, Chunxiao Yu1, Qingbo Guan1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: cyclophilin D; high-fat diet; mitochondrial dysfunctions; steroidogenic acute regulatory protein; testosterone deficiency
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31373170 PMCID: PMC6787510 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.14569
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1General conditions and lipid deposition in Leydig cells of mice with high‐fat intake. A, Comparison of bodyweight of mice fed with ND or HFD during 16 weeks. B, Ratio of fat distribution of whole body or perineum in the ND or HFD group at the 16th week of feeding. C, Representative photographs of somatotype, testes and epididymal fat of mice fed with ND or HFD at the end of the 16th week. D, Comparison of serum lipid levels between the ND and HFD groups. E, Comparison of serum sex hormone levels between the ND and HFD groups, including testosterone (T) and LH at the end of the 16th week. T: n = 10; LH: n = 5. F, Representative Oil Red staining sections and the area quantitative analysis showing lipid deposition of interstitial tissue of testes from mice in the ND or HFD group at the 16th week. G, Intratesticular testosterone levels of mice in the ND or HFD group. H, Representative Oil Red staining and the area quantitative analysis showing lipid accumulation in the Leydig cells with treatments of 0, 0.2 and 0.4 mmol/L of PA, respectively. I, Testosterone concentrations in media of TM3 cells exposed to 0, 0.2 and 0.4 mmol/L of PA for 24 hours. All data were represented as mean ± SEM, n = 4‐11 for each group. ** P < 0.01 vs ND or 0 PA group, and ## P < 0.01 vs 0.2 PA group were considered highly significant difference from the control
Figure 2High‐fat intake down‐regulates the expression of StAR in Leydig cells. A, qRT‐PCR analysis of the expression of StAR, P450scc and 3β‐HSD mRNA in testes from mice in the ND or HFD group. B, Immunoblot and quantitative analysis of StAR protein in testes of mice in the ND or HFD group. C, Representative immunofluorescence assay showing the localization and quantitative analysis of StAR in testicular interstitial tissue from mice in the ND or HFD group. Green fluorescence represented StAR and blue fluorescence represented cell nucleus. D, qRT‐PCR analysis showing the relative expression of StAR mRNA and E, immunoblot and quantitative analysis of StAR protein abundance in TM3 cells treated with 0, 0.2 and 0.4 mmol/L of PA, respectively. Representative images for quantitative immunoblot are shown. ND, n = 3 and HFD, n = 3. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 vs ND or 0 PA group were considered highly significant difference from the control
Figure 3High‐fat intake has detrimental effects on the mitochondria in Leydig cells. A, Representative transmission electron microscopic images of Leydig cells of testes from ND and HFD mice showing Leydig cells (L), mitochondria (M), lipid droplets (l) with an high electron density and nucleus (N). B, Mitochondrial function detection via Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test. C, ATP generation from mitochondria in 0 mmol/L or 0.4 mmol/L of the PA group. D, Measurement of ROS production by MitoSOX staining. Red fluorescence represented ROS. E, Determination of Δψm with the JC‐1 kit. Red fluorescence represented JC‐1 aggregations and green fluorescence represented JC‐1 monomers. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 vs 0 PA group, ## P < 0.01 vs 0.2 PA group were considered highly significant difference from the control
Figure 4High‐fat intake up‐regulates the expression of CypD in Leydig cells. A, qRT‐PCR analysis of the relative expression of CypD mRNA and B, representative images for immunoblot and quantitative analysis of CypD protein abundance of testes of mice in the ND or HFD group. C, qRT‐PCR analysis showing the relative expression of CypD mRNA and D, representative images for immunoblot and quantitative analysis of CypD protein abundance in TM3 cells treated with 0, 0.2, 0.4 mmol/L of PA, respectively. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3 for each group. * P < 0.05 vs ND or 0 PA group was considered highly significant difference from the control
Figure 5CypD overexpression down‐regulates expression of StAR. A, qRT‐PCR analysis of the relative expression of CypD and StAR mRNA and B, representative images for immunoblot and quantitative analysis of CypD and StAR protein abundance of testes of mice in the Ad‐EGFP or Ad‐PPIF group. C, Representative images for immunoblot and quantitative analysis of CypD and StAR protein abundance of TM3 cells in the pLV and pLV‐PPIF group. The ratio of CypD and StAR protein level to β‐actin was calculated. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3 for each group. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 vs Ad‐EGFP group were considered highly significant difference from the control
Figure 6Inhibition of CypD improves the inhibiting role of lipotoxicity on the StAR. A, Representative images for immunoblot and quantitative analysis of CypD and StAR protein abundance of testes of Ppif +/+ or Ppif −/ mice with HFD (n = 3). B and C, qRT‐PCR analysis of the relative expression of CypD and StAR mRNA of TM3 cells exposed to PA with or without the CSA pretreatment. D, Representative images for immunoblot and densitometry analysis of CypD and StAR protein of TM3 cells exposed to PA with or without the CSA pretreatment. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 vs ppif+/+ HFD or control group, # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.01 vs PA group were considered highly significant difference from the control