Rafael Seitenfus1,2, Antonio Nocchi Kalil3, Eduardo Dipp de Barros3, Claudio Galeano Zettler4, Gabriel Oliveira Dos Santos4, Olivier Glehen5, Carlos Humberto Cereser Junior3, Paulo Roberto Walter Ferreira6,7. 1. Surgical Oncology Service, Hospital Santa Rita, Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. rafasei@hotmail.com. 2. , Rua Dario Pederneiras, 354/204, Porto Alegre, RS, 90630-090, Brazil. rafasei@hotmail.com. 3. Surgical Oncology Service, Hospital Santa Rita, Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 4. Pathology and Cytology Service, Hospital Santa Rita, Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 5. Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils De Lyon, Pierre-Benite, France. 6. Graduate Program in Engineering, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Faculdade de Desenvolvimento do Rio Grande do Sul (FADERGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 7. Bhio Supply, Esteio, RS, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the last 20 years, intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) has been explored as a modality for the management of peritoneal metastases of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and primary peritoneal tumors. Direct delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the peritoneal cavity space has proved superior to systemic chemotherapy when evaluating characteristics such as drug concentration reached in the peritoneal space, penetration into peritoneal metastases, and chemotherapy-related toxicity. Traditionally, IPC is delivered by peritoneal lavage with a liquid solution. This form of delivery has limitations, including inhomogeneous intraperitoneal distribution and limited ability to penetrate tissues and metastatic nodules. An alternative mode of delivery is so-called pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Within this context, the present study sought to identify the pattern of spatial distribution of therapeutic solutions aerosolized into the peritoneal space using a single-port PIPAC device and ascertain whether the aerosolized method is superior to the traditional (liquid) mode of IPC delivery. METHODS: Analysis of the rate of intra-abdominal staining with aerosolized 2% silver nitrate in five porcine models. RESULTS: Assessment of differences in stain impregnation between the upper, middle, and lower abdomen did not reveal significant differences (p = 0.42). The median sum scores were 1 for the upper abdomen and 3 for the middle and lower abdomen. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosolization does not reach all regions of the abdomen homogeneously. However, adequate exposure of the upper abdomen, mid-abdomen, and lower abdomen to chemotherapeutic agents can be achieved with PIPAC.
BACKGROUND: In the last 20 years, intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) has been explored as a modality for the management of peritoneal metastases of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and primary peritoneal tumors. Direct delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the peritoneal cavity space has proved superior to systemic chemotherapy when evaluating characteristics such as drug concentration reached in the peritoneal space, penetration into peritoneal metastases, and chemotherapy-related toxicity. Traditionally, IPC is delivered by peritoneal lavage with a liquid solution. This form of delivery has limitations, including inhomogeneous intraperitoneal distribution and limited ability to penetrate tissues and metastatic nodules. An alternative mode of delivery is so-called pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Within this context, the present study sought to identify the pattern of spatial distribution of therapeutic solutions aerosolized into the peritoneal space using a single-port PIPAC device and ascertain whether the aerosolized method is superior to the traditional (liquid) mode of IPC delivery. METHODS: Analysis of the rate of intra-abdominal staining with aerosolized 2% silver nitrate in five porcine models. RESULTS: Assessment of differences in stain impregnation between the upper, middle, and lower abdomen did not reveal significant differences (p = 0.42). The median sum scores were 1 for the upper abdomen and 3 for the middle and lower abdomen. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosolization does not reach all regions of the abdomen homogeneously. However, adequate exposure of the upper abdomen, mid-abdomen, and lower abdomen to chemotherapeutic agents can be achieved with PIPAC.
Authors: Daniel Göhler; Veria Khosrawipour; Tanja Khosrawipour; David Diaz-Carballo; Thomas Albert Falkenstein; Jürgen Zieren; Michael Stintz; Urs Giger-Pabst Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Alexander Bellendorf; Veria Khosrawipour; Tanja Khosrawipour; Simon Siebigteroth; Joseph Cohnen; David Diaz-Carballo; Andreas Bockisch; Jürgen Zieren; Urs Giger-Pabst Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Clemens B Tempfer; Günther A Rezniczek; Paula Ende; Wiebke Solass; Marc-André Reymond Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.480