| Literature DB >> 31371390 |
Hong Yue Liu1,2, Sheng Rong Lu3, Zi Han Guo1,2, Zhi Sheng Zhang1,2, Xuan Ye1,2, Qiong Du1,2, Huan Li1,2, Qiang Wu4, Bo Yu1,2, Qing Zhai1,2, Jin Long Liu5.
Abstract
Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have proved to act as crucial biomarkers in tumors. Novel biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) need to be investigated badly. To identify the differentially expressed lncRNAs between NSCLC tissue and adjacent tissue, microarray analysis was performed. lncRNA SLC16A1-AS1 was significantly less expressed in NSCLC tissue than that in adjacent tissue. Gain-of-function experiments was performed to determine the biological functions of SLC16A1-AS. In situhybridization and survival analysis were applied in lung cancer tissue samples to determine the prognostic role of SLC16A1-AS1. It was showed that SLC16A1-AS1 was remarkably downregulated in NSCLC tissues and cell lines. Functionally, SLC16A1-AS1 overexpression could inhibit the viability and proliferation of lung cancer cell, block the cell cycle and promote cell apoptosis in vitro which may result from reduced phosphorylation of rat sarcoma (RAS)/ proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (RAF)/ mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/ extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) pathway caused by elevated expression of SLC16A1-AS1. Clinical sample analysis showed that SLC16A1-AS1 had a favorable impact on the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with NSCLC. Our results suggested that SLC16A1-AS1 may act as a potential biomarker for patients with NSCLC. © American Federation for Medical Research 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: SLC16A1-AS1; non-small cell lung cancer; prognosis; proliferation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31371390 PMCID: PMC6996107 DOI: 10.1136/jim-2019-001080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Investig Med ISSN: 1081-5589 Impact factor: 2.895
Figure 1lncRNA SLC16A1-AS1 is downregulated in NSCLC tissues. (A) The top 40 differentially expressed lncRNAs (>1.5 fold; Padj <0.05) were showed in a heat map. (B) lncRNAs with fold change >1.5 and Padj <0.05 were colorfully plotted in the volcano plot. lncRNA, long non-coding RNA; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.
Figure 2SLC16A1-AS1 inhibits cell proliferation of NSCLC cells in vitro. (A) The relative expression of SLC16A1-AS1 was measured by RT-qPCR in NSCLC cell lines (A549 and NCI-H460) and human lung epithelial cell (BEAS-2B). (B) Transfection efficiency was evaluated by RT-qPCR. ***P<0.001. Cell proliferation was evaluated by CCK8 (C) and MTT (D) assays. *P<0.01. (E) Flow cytometry system analysis was used to detect the phase of the cell cycle. *P<0.01. (F) Cell apoptosis rate was examined by Annexin V assay. **P<0.01. For each assay, three independent experiments were conducted. CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; RT-qPCR, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 3The phosphorylation levels of RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway was detected by Western blotting analysis in A549 and NCI-H460 cells after transfection with control vector and Lv-SLC16A1-AS1. **P<0.01 versus control.
Figure 4(A) In situ hybridization detection of SLC16A1-AS1 in NSCLC tissue (SLC16A1-AS1 high expression and SLC16A1-AS1 low expression) and adjacent normal tissue. (B) Immunohistochemistry detection of pRAF and pMEK1/2 in paraffin-embedded tissue sections.
Clinical characteristics of patients with non-small cell lung cancer
| Characteristic | All patients | SLC16A1-AS1 | SLC16A1-AS1 | P value |
| Total | 244 | 88 | 156 | |
| Sex |
| |||
| Male | 156 | 41 | 115 | |
| Female | 88 | 47 | 41 | |
| Age (years) | 0.374 | |||
| <70 | 188 | 65 | 123 | |
| ≥70 | 56 | 23 | 33 | |
| Smoking | <0.001 | |||
| No | 147 | 84 | 63 | |
| Yes | 97 | 4 | 93 | |
| BMI |
| |||
| <24 | 170 | 54 | 116 | |
| ≥24 | 74 | 34 | 40 | |
| Pathological type | 0.056 | |||
| Adenocarcinoma | 157 | 65 | 92 | |
| Squamous carcinoma | 72 | 20 | 52 | |
| Others | 15 | 3 | 12 | |
| ECOG score | 0.558 | |||
| 0–2 | 189 | 70 | 119 | |
| 3–4 | 55 | 18 | 37 | |
| Weight loss | 0.460 | |||
| <5% | 217 | 80 | 137 | |
| ≥5% | 27 | 8 | 19 | |
| TNM stage | 0.512 | |||
| I–II | 42 | 17 | 25 | |
| III–IV | 202 | 71 | 131 | |
| Vital status |
| |||
| Deceased | 102 | 21 | 81 | |
| Alive | 142 | 67 | 75 | |
| Progression |
| |||
| Yes | 74 | 7 | 67 | |
| No | 170 | 81 | 89 |
BMI, body mass index; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; TNM, tumor, node, metastases; Bold font highlights a significant difference.
Figure 5Kaplan-Meier survival curves: the overall survival (A) and progression free survival (B) in patients with NSCLC between low SLC16A1-AS1 group and high SLC16A1-AS1 group.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of non-small cell lung cancer patients on overall survival
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Sex (male vs female) | 1.357 (0.897 to 2.053) | 0.149 | ||
| Age (≥70 vs <70 years) | 1.095 (0.676 to 1.779) | 0.711 | ||
| Smoking (yes vs no) | 1.381 (0.918 to 2.078) | 0.122 | ||
| BMI (≥24 vs <24) | 0.543 (0.341 to 0.866) |
| 0.789 (0.490 to 1.272) | 0.331 |
| Pathological type | ||||
| Adenocarcinoma | Reference | |||
| Squamous carcinoma | 1.209 (0.795 to 1.840) | 0.374 | ||
| Others | 0.930 (0.338 to 2.557) | 0.888 | ||
| ECOG score (3–4 vs 0–2) | 1.962 (1.286 to 2.995) |
| 1.361 (0.875 to 2.117) | 0.171 |
| Weight loss (≥5% vs <5%) | 2.296 (1.389 to 3.793) |
| 1.685 (1.004 to 2.830) |
|
| TNM stage (III–IV vs I–II) | 3.160 (1.664 to 6.002) |
| 2.274 (1.174 to 4.405) |
|
| SLC16A1-AS1 expression (low vs high) | 3.858 (2.343 to 6.352) |
| 3.351 (2.027 to 5.541) |
|
BMI, body mass index; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; TNM, tumor, node, metastases; Bold font highlights a significant difference.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of non-small cell lung cancer patients on progression-free survival
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Sex (male vs female) | 1.143 (0.704 to 1.854) | 0.589 | ||
| Age (≥70 vs <70 years) | 0.760 (0.417 to 1.385) | 0.370 | ||
| Smoking (yes vs no) | 0.913 (0.560 to 1.490) | 0.716 | ||
| BMI (≥24 vs <24) | 0.782 (0.467 to 1.308) | 0.348 | ||
| Pathological type | ||||
| Adenocarcinoma | Reference | |||
| Squamous carcinoma | 1.343 (0.824 to 2.187) | 0.237 | ||
| Others | 1.338 (0.479 to 3.737) | 0.579 | ||
| ECOG score (3–4 vs 0–2) | 1.592 (0.950 to 2.669) | 0.077 | ||
| Weight loss (≥5% vs <5%) | 1.557 (0.796 to 3.043) | 0.196 | ||
| TNM stage (III–IV vs I–II) | 2.472 (1.213 to 5.036) |
| 1.929 (0.948 to 3.927) |
|
| SLC16A1-AS1 expression (low vs high) | 6.667 (3.150 to 12.518) |
| 6.036 (2.874 to 11.074) |
|
BMI, body mass index; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; TNM, tumor, node, metastases; Bold font highlights a significant difference.